Effects of aberration and flare on lithographic performance of SFET

The effects of aberration and flare on the lithographic performance of the EUV small-field exposure tool (SFET) were evaluated. Simulation results indicated that the effect of aberration on the image contrast of line-and-space (L&S) patterns should be small. In exposure experiments, 26-45-nm L&S patterns were successfully fabricated under annular illumination (σ=0.3/0.7). A key factor limiting resolution should be resist performance. Simulation results also indicated that the astigmatic aberration could produce a focal shift of about 60 nm between horizontal and vertical L&S patterns. The experimentally obtained focus shift agreed well with the simulation results. Dense 32-45-nm contact-hole (C/H) patterns were also successfully fabricated under annular illumination (σ=0.3/0.5). Due to astigmatic aberration, the C/H patterns were deformed at defocused positions, but they were almost circular at the best focus position. The flare of the projection optics measured by the Kirk method was 11% over a flare range of 1-100 μm. The effects of the 11% flare were evaluated using dark- and bright-field 32-nm L&S patterns. It was found that the top loss and line-width roughness (LWR) of the resist were larger for bright-field than for dark-field patterns. To reduce the impact of flare, we need EUV resists that are more robust with regard to flare. A comparison of the measured point spread function (PSF) of the flare and the calculated PSF revealed good agreement for long-range flare but some difference for short-range flare.

[1]  Iwao Nishiyama,et al.  Impact of EUV light scatter on CD control as a result of mask density changes , 2002, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[2]  Kenneth A. Goldberg,et al.  Performance of EUV photoresists on the ALS micro exposure tool , 2005, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[3]  M. Chandhok,et al.  Effects of flare in extreme ultraviolet lithography: Learning from the engineering test standa) , 2004 .

[4]  Hideki Morishima,et al.  Path to the HVM in EUVL through the development and evaluation of the SFET , 2007, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[5]  Iwao Nishiyama,et al.  Lithographic performance of high-numerical-aperture (NA=0.3) EUV small-field exposure tool (HINA) , 2005, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[6]  Osamu Suga,et al.  Impact of mask absorber properties on printability in EUV lithography , 2007, SPIE Photomask Technology.

[7]  Sang Hun Lee,et al.  Characterization of flare on Intel’s EUV MET , 2005, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[8]  Costas J. Spanos,et al.  Lithographic measurement of EUV flare in the 0.3-NA micro exposure tool optic at the Advanced Laser Source , 2005, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[9]  Patrick P. Naulleau,et al.  Characterization of low-order aberrations in the SEMATECH Albany MET tool , 2007, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[10]  Donald W. Sweeney,et al.  Performance upgrades in the EUV engineering test stand , 2002, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[11]  Sang Hun Lee,et al.  Lithographic flare measurements of EUV full-field projection optics , 2003, SPIE Advanced Lithography.