Modeling and Selection of Flexible Proteins for Structure‐Based Drug Design: Backbone and Side Chain Movements in p38 MAPK

Receptor rearrangement upon ligand binding (induced fit) is a major stumbling block in docking and virtual screening. Even though numerous studies have stressed the importance of including protein flexibility in ligand docking, currently available methods provide only a partial solution to the problem. Most of these methods, being computer intensive, are often impractical to use in actual drug discovery settings. We had earlier shown that ligand‐induced receptor side‐chain conformational changes could be modeled statistically using data on known receptor–ligand complexes. In this paper, we show that a similar approach can be used to model more complex changes like backbone flips and loop movements. We have used p38 MAPK as a test case and have shown that a few simple structural features of ligands are sufficient to predict the induced variation in receptor conformations. Rigorous validation, both by internal resampling methods and on an external test set, corroborates this finding and demonstrates the robustness of the models. We have also compared our results with those from an earlier molecular dynamics simulation study on DFG loop conformations of p38 MAPK, and found that the results matched in the two cases. Our statistical approach enables one to predict the final ligand‐induced conformation of the active site of a protein, based on a few ligand properties, prior to docking the ligand. We can do this without having to trace the step‐by‐step process by which this state is arrived at (as in molecular dynamics simulations), thereby drastically reducing computational effort.

[1]  Maria Kontoyianni,et al.  Evaluation of docking performance: comparative data on docking algorithms. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[2]  Christopher W. Murray,et al.  The sensitivity of the results of molecular docking to induced fit effects: Application to thrombin, thermolysin and neuraminidase , 1999, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[3]  P. Fischer,et al.  Protein structures in virtual screening: a case study with CDK2. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[4]  D. Zaller,et al.  Structural basis for p38α MAP kinase quinazolinone and pyridol-pyrimidine inhibitor specificity , 2003, Nature Structural Biology.

[5]  J. Gready,et al.  Combining docking and molecular dynamic simulations in drug design , 2006, Medicinal research reviews.

[6]  Roberto Todeschini,et al.  Handbook of Molecular Descriptors , 2002 .

[7]  Seymour Geisser,et al.  The Predictive Sample Reuse Method with Applications , 1975 .

[8]  Adrian H Elcock,et al.  Computational sampling of a cryptic drug binding site in a protein receptor: explicit solvent molecular dynamics and inhibitor docking to p38 MAP kinase. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  L. Tong,et al.  Inhibition of p38 MAP kinase by utilizing a novel allosteric binding site , 2002, Nature Structural Biology.

[10]  James G. Nourse,et al.  Reoptimization of MDL Keys for Use in Drug Discovery , 2002, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[11]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  FlexE: efficient molecular docking considering protein structure variations. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  Claudio N. Cavasotto,et al.  Protein flexibility in ligand docking and virtual screening to protein kinases. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  D. Zaller,et al.  Structural basis for p38alpha MAP kinase quinazolinone and pyridol-pyrimidine inhibitor specificity. , 2003 .

[14]  Thierry Langer,et al.  Recent Advances in Docking and Scoring , 2005 .

[15]  E. Goldsmith,et al.  Structural basis of inhibitor selectivity in MAP kinases. , 1998, Structure.

[16]  H. Carlson Protein flexibility and drug design: how to hit a moving target. , 2002, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[17]  R. Friesner,et al.  Novel procedure for modeling ligand/receptor induced fit effects. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[18]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  Extending the treatment of backbone energetics in protein force fields: Limitations of gas‐phase quantum mechanics in reproducing protein conformational distributions in molecular dynamics simulations , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[19]  Dakshanamurthy Sivanesan,et al.  In-silico Screening using Flexible Ligand Binding Pockets: A Molecular Dynamics-based Approach , 2005, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[20]  Jyothi Subramanian,et al.  A novel computational analysis of ligand-induced conformational changes in the ATP binding sites of cyclin dependent kinases. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[21]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[22]  X. Zou,et al.  Ensemble docking of multiple protein structures: Considering protein structural variations in molecular docking , 2006, Proteins.

[23]  A. Doweyko,et al.  Structural comparison of p38 inhibitor-protein complexes: a review of recent p38 inhibitors having unique binding interactions. , 2005, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.