Aspects of vertebral column resection in patients with rigid kyphotic and kyphoscoliotic deformities of different genesis of the thoracolumbar spine: multicenter retrospective observational cohort study

BACKGROUND: Vertebral column resection (VCR) as a type of spinal osteotomy is characterized by maximum possibilities of three-dimensional correction of various etiologies: congenital, post-tuberculous, iatrogenic (after other interventions on the spine), degenerative, and vertebral spondyloptosis caused by Kmmels disease, and primary, and metastatic tumor lesions of the spine. Nowadays, the use of single-level VCR is far beyond its initial purpose. OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to compare features of VCR for rigid deformities of various etiologies and management of erythrocyte blood products in the perioperative period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multicenter retrospective observational cohort study analyzed data from 53 adult (aged 18 years) patients with kyphotic and kyphoscoliotic deformities of the thoracic and lumbar spine, distributed into four comparison groups according to the deformity genesis, namely, impaired spinal development, traumatic genesis, degenerative or idiopathic, and neoplasms of the vertebral bodies. The characteristics of VCR in these patients were compared. RESULTS: The surgery duration was longer in VCR for spinal neoplasms (p 0.05) than for high-energy burst compression fractures of vertebral bodies and scoliotic deformities (grade IV). On average, this group also had the most cranial osteotomy level among the study groups. VCR for idiopathic scoliotic deformities is characterized by a larger intraoperative blood loss volume than other nosologies, and the differences were statistically significant. In male patients of this group, the hemoglobin level on day 1 after surgery was statistically significantly lower than in those who underwent VCR for compression fractures of the vertebral bodies or impaired vertebral development. During resection of the vertebral column for burst compression fractures of the vertebral bodies, the fixation length was less (p 0.05), with a similar intervention for developmental anomalies, deformities of postoperative genesis, and grade IV idiopathic scoliosis. VCR for grade IV idiopathic scoliosis requires a larger (p 0.05) volume of the reinfused autologous blood than for intervention for acute traumatic pathologies (burst compression fractures of the vertebral bodies). CONCLUSION: The versatility of clinical tasks for which resection of the spinal column can be performed using the VCR technique also determines the significant heterogeneity of the patients who undergo such treatment. Knowledge of the interventions in various nosologies is very useful in vertebrological practice.

[1]  Y. Akman,et al.  Single-Stage Posterior Vertebral Column Resection With Circumferential Reconstruction for Thoracic/Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures With or Without Neurological Deficit: Clinical Neurological and Radiological Outcomes , 2020, Global spine journal.

[2]  Xinghuo Wu,et al.  Incidence and risk factors of neurological complications during posterior vertebral column resection to correct severe post-tubercular kyphosis with late-onset neurological deficits: case series and review of the literature , 2018, Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.

[3]  G. Feng,et al.  Comparison of anterior and posterior vertebral column resection versus anterior and posterior spinal fusion for severe and rigid scoliosis. , 2017, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[4]  N. Zhang,et al.  Radiologic comparison of posterior release, internal distraction, final PSO and spinal fusion with one-stage posterior vertebral column resection for multi-level severe congenital scoliosis , 2017, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.

[5]  W. Ding,et al.  The Treatment Evaluation for Osteoporotic Kummell Disease by Modified Posterior Vertebral Column Resection: Minimum of One-Year Follow-Up , 2017, Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research.

[6]  S. Eicker,et al.  Reducing kyphotic deformity by posterior vertebral column resection with 360° osteosynthesis in metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) , 2016, European Spine Journal.

[7]  B. Liu,et al.  Analysis of 17 cases of posterior vertebral column resection in treating thoracolumbar spinal tuberculous angular kyphosis , 2015, Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.

[8]  Hong Zhao,et al.  Complications analysis of posterior vertebral column resection in 40 patients with spinal tumors , 2014, Experimental and therapeutic medicine.

[9]  A. Alanay,et al.  Osteotomies/spinal column resections in adult deformity , 2013, European Spine Journal.

[10]  S. Rajasekaran Kyphotic deformity in spinal tuberculosis and its management , 2012, International Orthopaedics.

[11]  K. Bridwell Decision Making Regarding Smith-Petersen vs. Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy vs. Vertebral Column Resection for Spinal Deformity , 2006, Spine.

[12]  R. Gaines L5 Vertebrectomy for the Surgical Treatment of Spondyloptosis: Thirty Cases in 25 years , 2005, Spine.

[13]  O. Boachie-Adjei,et al.  One-stage anterior and posterior hemivertebral resection and arthrodesis for congenital scoliosis. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[14]  A. Hodgson CORRECTION OF FIXED SPINAL CURVES: A PRELIMINARY COMMUNICATION. , 1965, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.