Top management team social capital, exploration-based innovation, and exploitation-based innovation in SMEs

Despite increasing interest in ambidextrous innovations, mainstream literature has excluded discussions on developing and combining exploratory innovation (ERI) and exploitative innovation (EII) in the small- and medium-sized enterprise (SME) sector. This issue from the SME perspective is worth addressing. Recent studies have conceptually argued the importance of the top management team (TMT) in managing ambidextrous innovations. Building on this argument, we explore how the top manager external social relationships foster ambidextrous innovations and whether internal social relationships among senior executives can be used to integrate such innovations. The results show that (a) distinct external managerial relationships cause differential innovations for SMEs, and (b) internal social capital among top managers could be used effectively to manage ambidextrous innovations. This research indicates that SMEs engaging in both high ERI and EII perform better when they focus on the balancing benefits of TMT internal social capital and the bridging benefits of TMT external social capital.

[1]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[2]  Haiyang Li,et al.  The contingent value of marketing strategy innovativeness for product development performance in Chinese new technology ventures , 2006 .

[3]  Raymond P. M. Chow,et al.  The effects of social capital and organizational innovativeness in different institutional contexts , 2008 .

[4]  Shyh-Rong Fang,et al.  Enhancing innovation through learning: the roles of market orientation and interorganisational knowledge stores , 2012, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[5]  E. Autio,et al.  Effects of Age at Entry, Knowledge Intensity, and Imitability on International Growth , 2000 .

[6]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[7]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[8]  Sungjoon Lee,et al.  Open innovation in SMEs—An intermediated network model , 2010 .

[9]  Justin J. P. Jansen,et al.  Senior Team Attributes and Organizational Ambidexterity: The Moderating Role of Transformational Leadership , 2008 .

[10]  Jan B. Heide,et al.  The Shadow Of The Future: Effects Of Anticipated Interaction And Frequency Of Contact On Buyer-Seller Cooperation , 1992 .

[11]  R. W. Vossen.  Relative Strengths and Weaknesses of Small Firms in Innovation , 1998 .

[12]  Peter Moran.  Structural vs. relational embeddedness: social capital and managerial performance , 2005 .

[13]  Mikko Paananen,et al.  Exploring the relationships between knowledge sources in the innovation process: evidence from Finnish innovators , 2009, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[14]  M. Lubatkin,et al.  Ambidexterity and Performance in Small-to Medium-Sized Firms: The Pivotal Role of Top Management Team Behavioral Integration , 2006 .

[15]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  The Art of Continuous Change : Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations , 1997 .

[16]  Haiyang Li,et al.  Product Innovation Strategy and the Performance of New Technology Ventures in China , 2001 .

[17]  E. Autio,et al.  SOCIAL CAPITAL, KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION, AND KNOWLEDGE EXPLOITATION IN YOUNG TECHNOLOGY-BASED FIRMS , 2001 .

[18]  R. Nelson.  THE STRENGTH OF STRONG TIES: SOCIAL NETWORKS AND INTERGROUP CONFLICT IN ORGANIZATIONS , 1989 .

[19]  F. Frattini,et al.  Enabling Open Innovation in Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises: How to Find Alternative Applications for Your Technologies , 2010 .

[20]  G. Labianca,et al.  Group Social Capital and Group Effectiveness: The Role of Informal Socializing Ties , 2004 .

[21]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited , 2003 .

[22]  Phani Tej Adidam,et al.  Antecedents and Consequences of Marketing Strategy Making: A Model and a Test , 1999 .

[23]  Ilya Okhmatovskiy.  Performance Implications of Ties to the Government and Soes: A Political Embeddedness Perspective , 2010 .

[24]  Wei-ping Wu.  Dimensions of Social Capital and Firm Competitiveness Improvement: The Mediating Role of Information Sharing , 2007 .

[25]  Albert A. Cannella,et al.  Social Capital and Knowledge Creation: Diminishing Returns of the Number and Strength of Exchange Relationships , 2004 .

[26]  Ray Reagans,et al.  Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range , 2003 .

[27]  J. Dawson,et al.  Probing three-way interactions in moderated multiple regression: development and application of a slope difference test. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[28]  P. Adler,et al.  Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept , 2002 .

[29]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity: Balancing Exploitation and Exploration for Sustained Performance , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[30]  R. Chandy,et al.  Organizing for Radical Product Innovation: The Overlooked Role of Willingness to Cannibalize , 1998 .

[31]  Hao-Chen Huang,et al.  Technological innovation capability creation potential of open innovation: a cross-level analysis in the biotechnology industry , 2011, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[32]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  Managing Strategic Contradictions: A Top Management Model for Managing Innovation Streams , 2005 .

[33]  Sze‐Sze Wong.  Task knowledge overlap and knowledge variety: the role of advice network structures and impact on group effectiveness , 2008 .

[34]  D. Hambrick,et al.  The external ties of top executives: Implications for strategic choice and performance. , 1997 .

[35]  Carmen Cabello-Medina,et al.  Social and organizational capital: Building the context for innovation , 2010 .

[36]  Antonio Capaldo.  Network Structure and Innovation: The Leveraging of a Dual Network as a Distinctive Relational Capability , 2006 .

[37]  B. Lilly,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF CONFLICT, TRUST, AND TASK COMMITMENT ON PROJECT TEAM PERFORMANCE , 1996 .

[38]  Henrik Agndal,et al.  Social Capital and its Influence on Changes in Internationalization Mode among Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises , 2007 .

[39]  A. Salter,et al.  Searching high and low: what types of firms use universities as a source of innovation? , 2004 .

[40]  M. Boisot,et al.  From Fiefs to Clans and Network Capitalism: Explaining China's Emerging Economic Order , 1996 .

[41]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[42]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intrafirm Networks , 1998 .

[43]  Ci-Rong Li,et al.  Competence exploration and exploitation in new product development , 2011 .

[44]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[45]  C. Gibson,et al.  THE ANTECEDENTS , CONSEQUENCES , AND MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY , 2004 .

[46]  Mike W. Peng,et al.  Managerial Ties and Firm Performance in a Transition Economy: The Nature of a Micro-Macro Link , 2000 .

[47]  Malte Brettel,et al.  Top management's social capital and learning in new product development and its interaction with external uncertainties , 2012 .