Can Markov Switching Models Predict Excess Foreign Exchange Returns?

This paper merges the literature on technical trading rules with the literature on Markov switching to develop economically useful trading rules. The Markov models' out-of sample, excess returns modestly exceed those of standard technical rules and are profitable over the most recent subsample. A portfolio of Markov and standard technical rules outperforms either set individually, on a risk-adjusted basis. The Markov rules' high excess returns contrast with mixed performance on statistical tests of forecast accuracy. There is no clear source for the trends, but permitting the mean to depend on higher moments of the exchange rate distribution modestly increases returns.

[1]  P. Chang,et al.  Methodical Madness: Technical Analysis and the Irrationality of Exchange-rate Forecasts , 1999 .

[2]  John Okunev,et al.  Do Momentum-Based Strategies Still Work in Foreign Currency Markets? , 2003, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[3]  Blake LeBaron,et al.  Do Moving Average Trading Rule Results Imply Nonlinearites in Foreign Exchange Markets , 1992 .

[4]  Richard M. Levich,et al.  The Significance of Technical Trading-Rule Profits in the Foreign Exchange Market: a Bootstrap Approach , 1991 .

[5]  Stephen L Taylor,et al.  Trading futures using a channel rule: A study of the predictive power of technical analysis with currency examples , 1994 .

[6]  Man-kin. Chow,et al.  Technical analysis of the foreign exchange market , 1992 .

[7]  Anna D. Martin.  Technical trading rules in the spot foreign exchange markets of developing countries , 2001 .

[8]  Christopher J. Neely.  The temporal pattern of trading rule returns and exchange rate intervention: intervention does not generate technical trading profits , 2002 .

[9]  Christopher J. Neely,et al.  How Well Do Monetary Fundamentals Forecast Exchange Rates , 2002 .

[10]  Peter Saacke,et al.  Technical analysis and the effectiveness of central bank intervention , 2002 .

[11]  B. LeBaron.  Technical Trading Rule Profitability and Foreign Exchange Intervention , 1996 .

[12]  Michael J. Dueker.  Markov Switching in GARCH Processes and Mean-Reverting Stock-Market Volatility , 1997 .

[13]  J. Nyblom.  Testing for the Constancy of Parameters over Time , 1989 .

[14]  James D. Hamilton.  Analysis of time series subject to changes in regime , 1990 .

[15]  Hans Dewachter,et al.  Can Markov switching models replicate chartist profits in the foreign exchange market , 2001 .

[16]  Christopher J. Neely.  The Temporal Pattern of Trading Rule Returns and Central Bank Intervention: Intervention Does Not Generate Technical Trading Rule Profits , 2000 .

[17]  T. Andersen.  THE ECONOMETRICS OF FINANCIAL MARKETS , 1998, Econometric Theory.

[18]  James D. Hamilton,et al.  Long Swings in the Dollar: Are They in the Data and Do Markets Know It? The American Economic Review , 1990 .

[19]  Kenneth S. Rogoff,et al.  Exchange rate models of the seventies. Do they fit out of sample , 1983 .

[20]  Sanford J. Grossman.  On the Impossibility of Informationally Efficient Markets , 1980 .

[21]  Christopher J. Neely,et al.  Is Technical Analysis in the Foreign Exchange Market Profitable? A Genetic Programming Approach , 1996, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[22]  R. Fisher.  The Advanced Theory of Statistics , 1943, Nature.

[23]  I. Mathur,et al.  Central bank intervention and trading rule profits in foreign exchange markets , 1997 .

[24]  M. C. Jensen.  The Performance of Mutual Funds in the Period 1945-1964 , 1967 .

[25]  C. Engel.  Can the Markov Switching Model Forecast Exchange Rates? , 1992 .

[26]  Christopher J. Neely.  Technical analysis in the foreign exchange market: a layman's guide , 1997 .

[27]  R. Sweeney,et al.  Beating the Foreign Exchange Market , 1986 .