Modeling forces generated within rigid liquid composite molding tools. Part B: Numerical analysis

Liquid composite molding (LCM) processes generate forces on tooling due to internal resin pressure fields and the resistance to compaction offered by fiber reinforcements. In Part A of this work the authors have presented a detailed study on the evolution of total clamping force during resin transfer molding (RTM) and injection/compression molding (I/CM) cycles. The influence of the complex compaction response of two different reinforcements was demonstrated, important effects including stress relaxation, an apparent lubrication by the injected fluid, and permanent deformation. In the current paper attempts are made to model clamping force evolution utilizing elastic reinforcement compaction models. The predictions are shown to have significant qualitative errors if a single elastic model is applied, particularly if forces due to reinforcement compaction dominate those due to fluid pressure. By using a combination of elastic models significant qualitative and quantitative improvements were made to the predictions. It is concluded that careful characterization of both reinforcement permeability and compaction response are required for an accurate LCM tooling force analysis.

[1]  Joël Bréard,et al.  Analysis of dynamic flows through porous media. Part II: Deformation of a double-scale fibrous reinforcement , 2003 .

[2]  S. Bickerton,et al.  Modeling forces generated within rigid liquid composite molding tools. Part A: Experimental study , 2007 .

[3]  Xuan-Tan Pham,et al.  Simulation of compression resin transfer molding to manufacture thin composite shells , 1999 .

[4]  R. Pipes,et al.  Modeling of a thermoplastic pultrusion process , 1991 .

[5]  Tsu-Wei Chou,et al.  A nonlinear compaction model for fibrous preforms , 2001 .

[6]  Simon Bickerton,et al.  Modeling and evaluation of the filling stage of injection/compression moulding , 2003 .

[7]  Ming-Shyan Huang,et al.  Simulation of injection-compression mold-filling process , 1998 .

[8]  J. Summerscales,et al.  The compressibility of a reinforcement fabric , 1995 .

[9]  Simon Bickerton,et al.  The viscoelastic compression behavior of liquid composite molding preforms , 2003 .

[10]  W. Lee,et al.  Analysis of resin transfer/compression molding process , 1999 .

[11]  S. J. Wineman,et al.  Consolidation Experiments for Laminate Composites , 1987 .

[12]  Timothy G. Gutowski,et al.  The Consolidation of Laminate Composites , 1987 .

[13]  Constantina Lekakou,et al.  Compression in the processing of polymer composites 2. Modelling of the viscoelastic compression of resin-impregnated fibre networks , 1999 .

[14]  J. L. Kardos,et al.  A model for resin flow during composite processing part 2: Numerical analysis for unidirectional graphite/epoxy laminates , 1987 .

[15]  D. Bhattacharyya,et al.  Exploring the Non-Elastic Compression Deformation of Dry Glass Fibre Reinforcements , 2007 .

[16]  John P. Coulter,et al.  Resin impregnation during composites manufacturing: Theory and experimentation , 1989 .

[17]  J. L. Kardos,et al.  3-D Nonisothermal Flow Simulation Model for Injected Pultrusion Processes , 1999 .

[18]  C. L. Tucker,et al.  Numerical simulation of injection/compression liquid composite molding. Part 2: preform compression , 2001 .

[19]  François Robitaille,et al.  Compaction of textile reinforcements for composites manufacturing. II: Compaction and relaxation of dry and H2O‐saturated woven reinforcements , 1998 .

[20]  Wen-Bin Young,et al.  Analysis of resin injection molding in molds with preplaced fiber mats. II: Numerical simulation and experiments of mold filling , 1991 .

[21]  F. Trochu,et al.  Advanced numerical simulation of liquid composite molding for process analysis and optimization , 2006 .

[22]  Piaras Kelly,et al.  Viscoelastic response of dry and wet fibrous materials during infusion processes , 2006 .

[23]  L. J. Lee,et al.  Analysis of resin injection molding in molds with preplaced fiber mats. I: Permeability and compressibility measurements , 1991 .

[24]  Joseph P. Greene,et al.  Analysis of an injection/compression liquid composite molding process , 1998 .

[25]  Christophe Binetruy,et al.  Simulation of LCM processes involving induced or forced deformations , 2006 .

[26]  M. V. Bruschke,et al.  A finite element/control volume approach to mold filling in anisotropic porous media , 1990 .

[27]  J. L. Kardos,et al.  A model for resin flow during composite processing: Part 1—general mathematical development , 1987 .

[28]  L. J. Lee,et al.  Experimental and Theoretical Analysis of Pulling Force in Pultrusion and Resin Injection Pultrusion (RIP) – Part II: Modeling and Simulation , 2003 .

[29]  Kumar K. Tamma,et al.  On a Pure Finite-Element-Based Methodology for Resin Transfer Mold (RTM) Filling Simulations. , 1999 .

[30]  Constantina Lekakou,et al.  Compression and microstructure of fibre plain woven cloths in the processing of polymer composites , 1998 .

[31]  Karthik Ramani,et al.  Experiments on compression moulding and pultrusion of thermoplastic powder impregnated towpregs , 1995 .

[32]  L. J. Lee,et al.  Mold filling and curing analysis in liquid composite molding , 1993 .

[33]  F. Trochu,et al.  Numerical analysis of the resin transfer molding process by the finite element method , 1993 .

[34]  Suresh G. Advani,et al.  Desirable features in mold filling simulations for Liquid Composite Molding processes , 2004 .

[35]  François Robitaille,et al.  Compaction of textile reinforcements for composites manufacturing. I: Review of experimental results , 1998 .

[36]  Simon Bickerton,et al.  Compression flow permeability measurement: a continuous technique , 2003 .