Have Your Cake and Eat it Too? Managing Knowledge in Hybrid Agile-Traditional Development Projects

This research examines how knowledge management elements of systems development projects are adapted to correspond with the increasing use of agile practices. Using a single, longitudinal case study, we draw on interview data from an initial CRM implementation that used a traditional approach, followed by a second project phase employing a hybrid agile-traditional approach. Oriented using the concept of ambidexterity, our findings suggest that some knowledge management elements remained traditional, others became strongly agile, and some integrated both approaches together in a hybrid manner. Our study aids practitioners by providing insights into the opportunities and pitfalls of managing knowledge within hybrid development projects. For researchers, this paper applies the concept of ambidexterity in an agile development context as it relates to knowledge management. Our findings extend the literature on the incremental trade-offs that companies face when attempting to simultaneously explore and exploit two development approaches.

[1]  Michael H. Zack,et al.  Developing a Knowledge Strategy , 1999 .

[2]  Tung Bui,et al.  Simulating mixed agile and plan-based requirements prioritization strategies: proof-of-concept and practical implications , 2009, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[3]  Frank T. Rothaermel,et al.  Ambidexterity in Technology Sourcing: The Moderating Role of Absorptive Capacity , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[4]  Liang Li,et al.  The Business Value of CRM Technology: From the Perspective of Organizational Ambidexterity , 2013, AMCIS.

[5]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[6]  Tore Dybå,et al.  Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review , 2008, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[7]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  Customising agile methods to software practices at Intel Shannon , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Jeff Sutherland,et al.  Manifesto for Agile Software Development , 2013 .

[9]  Grigori Melnik,et al.  Knowledge sharing: agile methods vs. Tayloristic methods , 2003, WET ICE 2003. Proceedings. Twelfth IEEE International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises, 2003..

[10]  Barry W. Boehm,et al.  Using Risk to Balance Agile and Plan-Driven Methods , 2003, Computer.

[11]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  Systems Development Ambidexterity: Explaining the Complementary and Substitutive Roles of Formal and Informal Controls , 2010, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[12]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Learning failure in information systems development , 1999, Inf. Syst. J..

[13]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[14]  Lan Cao,et al.  Ambidexterity in Agile Distributed Development: An Empirical Investigation , 2012, Inf. Syst. Res..

[15]  Marco Marabelli,et al.  Ambidexterity in Service Organizations: Reference Models from the Banking Industry , 2012 .

[16]  Grigori Melnik,et al.  Direct verbal communication as a catalyst of agile knowledge sharing , 2004, Agile Development Conference.

[17]  Sridhar P. Nerur,et al.  Can Agile and Traditional Systems Development Approaches Coexist? An Ambidextrous View , 2006, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[18]  George Mangalaraj,et al.  Challenges of migrating to agile methodologies , 2005, CACM.

[19]  Mauricio Cristal,et al.  A Case Study of Knowledge Management Usage in Agile Software Projects , 2009, ICEIS.

[20]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change , 1996 .

[21]  U. Yeliz Eseryel,et al.  Knowledge management and knowledge management systems , 2005 .

[22]  Lan Cao,et al.  A framework for adapting agile development methodologies , 2009, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[23]  M. Polanyi Personal Knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy , 1959 .

[24]  C. Gibson,et al.  THE ANTECEDENTS , CONSEQUENCES , AND MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY , 2004 .

[25]  J. Swart,et al.  Mechanisms for Managing Ambidexterity: A Review and Research Agenda , 2013 .

[26]  Torgeir Dingsøyr,et al.  A decade of agile methodologies: Towards explaining agile software development , 2012, J. Syst. Softw..

[27]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity: Balancing Exploitation and Exploration for Sustained Performance , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[28]  Martin Wiener,et al.  Challenges and Dilemmas in Open Innovation: Ambidexterity as Management Approach , 2013, Wirtschaftsinformatik.

[29]  Venugopal Balijepally,et al.  Theoretical reflections on agile development methodologies , 2007, Commun. ACM.

[30]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  Supporting Collaborative Process Knowledge Management in New Product Development Teams , 1999, Decis. Support Syst..

[31]  Mani R. Subramani,et al.  Situated Learning and the Situated Knowledge Web: Exploring the Ground Beneath Knowledge Management , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..