Entry and business strategies used by international architectural, engineering and construction firms in China

International architectural, engineering and construction (AEC) firms need to decide on the appropriate market entry mode and business strategies when undertaking projects overseas. The objectives of this research are to investigate the effective market entry modes for penetrating China and the effective business strategies for managing projects in China. The research method is based on a structured questionnaire and data were collected via postal survey. Interviews have been conducted to complement the survey. The results show that establishing a wholly owned subsidiary in China is the most effective entry mode. Foreign AEC firms need to adopt a differentiation strategy by providing niche and superior service. They must also pay great attention to customer satisfaction to gain competitive advantage and clinch and manage projects. To succeed in China, foreign AEC firms need to set up a physical office there, to develop a good understanding of local by‐laws, understand client requirements better and therefore provide them with a superior product or service.

[1]  B. Kogut Joint ventures: Theoretical and empirical perspectives , 1988 .

[2]  Robert I Westwood,et al.  Power, politics and influence , 2018, Leadership.

[3]  Kressel,et al.  Competing for the Future , 2007 .

[4]  David B. Ashley,et al.  Political Risks in International Construction , 1987 .

[5]  W. P. Strassmann The rise, fall, and transformation of overseas construction contracting , 1989 .

[6]  R. Tiong,et al.  Project financing as a competitive strategy in winning overseas jobs , 1993 .

[7]  R. Gulati,et al.  The dynamics of learning alliances: competition, cooperation, and relative scope , 1998 .

[8]  David N Sillars,et al.  Japanese Construction Alliances , 1997 .

[9]  Ser Khoon Quak Marketing abroad : competitive strategies & market niches for the Singapore construction industry , 1991 .

[10]  Andrew C. Inkpen,et al.  KNOWLEDGE, BARGAINING POWER, AND THE INSTABILITY OF INTERNATIONAL JOINT VENTURES , 1997 .

[11]  Roozbeh Kangari,et al.  Managing International Operations: A Guide for Engineers, Architects, and Construction Managers , 1997 .

[12]  S. Park,et al.  The Effect of National Culture, Organizational Complementarity, and Economic Motivation on Joint Venture Dissolution , 1997 .

[13]  Seung Heon Han,et al.  Approaches for Making Risk-Based Go/No-Go Decision for International Projects , 2001 .

[14]  A. Rugman,et al.  New Theories of the Multinational Enterprise , 1983 .

[15]  Clayton M. Christensen The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail , 2013 .

[16]  M. Porter The Competitive Advantage Of Nations , 1990 .

[17]  Y. Doz,et al.  The Multinational Mission: Balancing Local Demands and Global Vision , 1999 .

[18]  Robert L. K. Tiong,et al.  Evaluation and management of foreign exchange and revenue risks in China's BOT projects , 2000 .

[19]  Rosalie L. Tung,et al.  Achieving business success in Confucian societies: The importance of guanxi (connections) , 1996 .