Bridge Expansion Joint in Road Transition Curve: Effects Assessment on Heavy Vehicles

Properly-designed road surfaces provide a durable surface on which traffic can pass smoothly and safely. In fact, the main causes that determine the structural decay of the pavement and its parts are the traffic loads. These repeated actions can create undesirable unevennesses on the road surface, which induce vertical accelerations on vehicles, up to hindering contact between pavement and tire, with dangerous consequences on traffic safety. The dynamic actions transmitted by the vehicles depend on these irregularities: often, a bridge expansion joint (BEJ), introducing a necessary discontinuity between different materials, determines from the beginning a geometric irregularity in the running surface. Besides, some structural conditions could emphasize the problem (e.g., local cracking due to the settlement of the subgrade near the abutment or the discontinuity of stiffness due to the presence of different materials). When the BEJ is located in a transition curve, an inevitable vertical irregularity between road and joint can reach values of some centimeters, with serious consequences for the road safety. This paper deals with the analysis of a case study of a BEJ. Several test surveys were performed in order to fully characterize the effects on both vehicles and pavement. The three-dimensional representation of the pavement surface and the acceleration measurements on a heavy test vehicle were performed to analyze the joint behavior under traffic. Finally, a finite element model was implemented to evaluate the stress contribution on vehicle components induced by the vertical irregularities.

[1]  Hitoshi Furuta,et al.  Life-cycle of structural systems: design, assessment, maintenance and management , 2014 .

[2]  P A Leblanc,et al.  Vehicle weights and dimensions study; volume 11 - effects of suspension variations on the dynamic wheel loads of a heavy articulated highway vehicle , 1986 .

[3]  G. Loprencipe,et al.  Development of a road asset management system in Kazakhstan , 2017 .

[4]  Jorge de Brito,et al.  Inspection survey of 150 expansion joints in road bridges , 2009 .

[5]  Donald A. Streit,et al.  ROAD SIMULATOR STUDY OF HEAVY-VEHICLE WHEEL FORCES , 1998 .

[6]  Giuseppe Loprencipe,et al.  Effetti dinamici nei giunti delle pavimentazioni aeroportuali in calcestruzzo , 2007 .

[7]  Michael W. Sayers ON THE CALCULATION OF INTERNATIONAL ROUGHNESS INDEX FROM LONGITUDINAL ROAD PROFILE , 1995 .

[8]  Giuseppe Cantisani,et al.  Improvement of Portable Concrete Barrier Design Using Computational Mechanics , 2006 .

[9]  David P. Thambiratnam,et al.  Development of an analytical model for treating bridge-vehicle interaction , 1998 .

[10]  Karim Chatti,et al.  Development of New Profile-Based Truck Dynamic Load Index , 2002 .

[11]  Giuseppe Cantisani,et al.  Road Roughness and Whole Body Vibration: Evaluation Tools and Comfort Limits , 2010 .

[12]  Giuseppe Cantisani,et al.  Global assessment method of road distresses , 2015 .

[13]  R Eyre,et al.  DAMPING AND FREQUENCY MEASUREMENTS ON EIGHT BOX GIRDER BRIDGES , 1975 .

[14]  Shaopu Yang,et al.  Numerical and experimental investigation on stochastic dynamic load of a heavy duty vehicle , 2010 .

[15]  David Cebon,et al.  Dynamic interaction between heavy vehicles and highway bridges , 1997 .

[16]  Yeong-Bin Yang,et al.  Vehicle–bridge interaction dynamics and potential applications , 2005 .

[17]  David Cebon,et al.  Handbook of vehicle-road interaction , 1999 .

[18]  Level Crossing , 2010 .

[19]  Giuseppe Loprencipe,et al.  Ride Quality Due to Road Surface Irregularities: Comparison of Different Methods Applied on a Set of Real Road Profiles , 2017 .

[20]  Olivier Coussy,et al.  Effects of surface irregularities upon the dynamic response of bridges under suspended moving loads , 1985 .

[21]  R. CANTIENI Investigation of vehicle-bridge interaction for highway bridges , .

[22]  Lawrence A. Bergman,et al.  POTHOLE-INDUCED CONTACT FORCES IN A SIMPLE VEHICLE MODEL , 2002 .

[23]  Peter Múčka,et al.  Road Roughness Limit Values Based on Measured Vehicle Vibration , 2017 .

[24]  G P Tilly,et al.  DAMPING MEASUREMENTS ON STEEL AND COMPOSITE BRIDGES , 1977 .

[25]  J. Gerring A case study , 2011, Technology and Society.

[26]  Giuseppe Loprencipe,et al.  Use of generated artificial road profiles in road roughness evaluation , 2017 .

[27]  Chul-Woo Kim,et al.  Three-dimensional dynamic analysis for bridge-vehicle interaction with roadway roughness , 2005 .

[28]  Jordan Willis CORRELATION OF CALCULATED AND MEASURED DYNAMIC BEHAVIOUR OF BRIDGES , 1977 .

[29]  W J Steyn Moving dynamic loads caused by bridge deck joint unevenness - a case study , 2004 .

[30]  Giuseppe Cantisani,et al.  Retrofit of an existing Italian bridge rail for H4a containment level using simulation , 2009 .

[31]  Paola Di Mascio,et al.  Environmental Impact Assessment of Road Asphalt Pavements , 2013 .

[32]  Francis T.K. Au,et al.  Effects of random road surface roughness and long-term deflection of prestressed concrete girder and cable-stayed bridges on impact due to moving vehicles , 2001 .

[33]  Jorge de Brito,et al.  Management system for expansion joints of road bridges , 2010 .

[34]  Peter Múčka,et al.  International Roughness Index specifications around the world , 2017 .

[35]  Giuseppe Loprencipe,et al.  Sustainable Pavement Management System in Urban Areas Considering the Vehicle Operating Costs , 2017 .