Ecosystem Services and Human Well-Being: a Participatory Study in a Mountain Community in Portugal

Ecosystem services are essential for human well-being, but the links between ecosystem services and human well-being are complex, diverse, context-dependent, and complicated by the need to consider different spatial and temporal scales to assess them properly. We present the results of a study in the rural community of Sistelo in northern Portugal that formed part of the Portugal Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. The main purpose of our study was to assess the linkages between human well-being and ecosystem services at the local level, as perceived by the community. We used a range of tools that included participatory rural appraisal and rapid rural appraisal as well as other field methods such as direct observation, familiarization and participation in activities, semistructured interviews, trend lines, wellbeing ranking, and other ranking and scoring exercises. Sistelo has a unique landscape of agricultural terraces that are now being abandoned because of the depopulation of the region, a common trend in mountainous rural areas of Europe. From the community perspective, some components of well-being such as material well-being have been improving, whereas some ecosystem services, e.g., food production, have been declining. Although a few of the local criteria for well-being are closely related to local ecosystem services, most of them are not. People recognize many of the services provided by ecosystems, in particular, provisioning, cultural, and regulating services, although they feel that provisioning services are the most important for well-being. It is apparent that, for the Sistelo community, there is an increasing disconnect between local well-being and at least some local ecosystem services. This disconnect is associated with greater freedom of choice at the local level, which gives the local inhabitants the power to find substitutes for ecosystem services. The consequences of land abandonment for human well-being and ecosystem services at different temporal and spatial scales are discussed.

[1]  Franz Höchtl,et al.  "Wilderness": what it means when it becomes a reality - a case study from the southwestern Alps. , 2005 .

[2]  E. H. Decker,et al.  The effect of 50 years of landscape change on species richness and community composition , 2001 .

[3]  Deepak Narayan,et al.  Voices of the Poor , 2001 .

[4]  J. Baudry,et al.  Species biodiversity in changing agricultural landscapes: A case study in the Pays d'Auge, France , 1995 .

[5]  A. Farina.  Landscape structure and breeding bird distribution in a sub-Mediterranean agro-ecosystem , 1997, Landscape Ecology.

[6]  D. Narayan,et al.  Bonds and Bridges: Social Capital and Poverty , 2002 .

[7]  G. Pardini,et al.  Land use change effects on abandoned terraced soils in a Mediterranean catchment, NE Spain , 2003 .

[8]  T. Fulbright.  Viewpoint: a theoretical basis for planning woody plant control to maintain species diversity. , 1996 .

[9]  Francisco Moreira,et al.  Landscape changes and breeding bird assemblages in northwestern Portugal: the role of fire , 2001, Landscape Ecology.

[10]  S. Vermeulen,et al.  Integrating global and local values: a review of biodiversity assessment. , 2002 .

[11]  G. Daily.  Nature's services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. , 1998 .

[12]  E. Bignal,et al.  Low-intensity farming systems in the conservation of the countryside , 1996 .

[13]  Jennifer Narayan Deepa Rietbergen-McCracken,et al.  Participation and Social Assessment: Tools and Techniques , 1998 .

[14]  R. Chambers.  Whose Reality Counts?: Putting the First Last , 1997 .

[15]  R. Chambers.  Rural Appraisal: Rapid, Relaxed and Participatory , 1992 .

[16]  D. Naraya.  Voices of the poor : can anyone hear us ? , 2000 .

[17]  Gretchen C. Daily,et al.  Protecting Ecosystem Services: Science, Economics and Law , 2001 .

[18]  R. Moss,et al.  Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment , 2003 .

[19]  J. Lassoie,et al.  The Interdependence of Ecosystem and Community Viability: A Theoretical Framework to Guide Research and Application , 2002 .

[20]  Elizabeth W. Price,et al.  Evaluating Quality of Life, Economic Vulnerabilities, and Drivers of Ecosystem Change , 2004, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[21]  Ian Scoones,et al.  A trainer's guide for participatory learning and action , 1995 .

[22]  Francisco Moreira,et al.  Temporal (1958–1995) pattern of change in a cultural landscape of northwestern Portugal: implications for fire occurrence , 2001, Landscape Ecology.

[23]  A. Gibon,et al.  Agricultural abandonment in mountain areas of Europe: Environmental consequences and policy response , 2000 .

[24]  Pinto Correia,et al.  Land abandonment: Changes in the land use patterns around the Mediterranean basin , 1993 .

[25]  Robert Chambers,et al.  Crying Out for Change: Voices of the Poor , 2000 .

[26]  Species number, area and habitat diversity in the Galapagos Islands , 1983, Vegetatio.

[27]  J. Kerr,et al.  Remotely sensed habitat diversity predicts butterfly species richness and community similarity in Canada , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  D. Narayan.  Toward Participatory Research , 1996 .

[29]  C. Folke,et al.  The critical natural capital of ecosystem performance as insurance for human well-being , 2003 .

[30]  A. Fleischer,et al.  Measuring the recreational value of agricultural landscape , 2000 .