What drives people's opinions of electricity infrastructure? Empirical evidence from Ireland

Abstract Across the EU, significant infrastructure investment is needed in both generation from renewable energy sources (RES) and the electricity grid to meet the European targets on emission reduction and RES expansion. Experiences show, however, that citizens may object to new energy infrastructure in their localities which may cause delays in achieving the targets. To avoid delays, it is crucial to understand what drives people's opinions. To explore people's opinions of different electricity generation and transmission technologies in Ireland, we conducted a nationally-representative survey. Concerning the drivers, we distinguish between socio-demographics, technology-specific perceptions, and energy policy preferences. Our results show that people generally have positive views of RES technologies. While this indicates that Irish citizens agree to move towards cleaner electricity sources, we find reluctance amongst people to have these technologies located close to their places of residence. We find that, across most technologies, the tradeoff people make between economic and environmental policy objectives drives their opinions of, and their tendencies to oppose, technology developments. The significance of most socio-demographic variables, however, is largely technology-dependent. This highlights that policy makers need to understand how people make tradeoffs between policy objectives and how these tradeoffs relate to their opinions of different technologies.

[1]  Mhairi Aitken,et al.  Why we still don't understand the social aspects of wind power: A critique of key assumptions within the literature , 2010 .

[2]  Dan van der Horst,et al.  Wind power planning, landscapes and publics , 2010 .

[3]  S. Sills,et al.  Innovations in Survey Research , 2002 .

[4]  J. Guzmán Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata , 2013 .

[5]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  A critical and empirical analysis of the national-local ‘gap’ in public responses to large-scale energy infrastructures , 2015 .

[6]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[7]  W. Edwards,et al.  Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research , 1986 .

[8]  Tien-Chin Wang,et al.  Multi-criteria decision making with fuzzy linguistic preference relations , 2011 .

[9]  Edgar L. W. Morgenroth,et al.  The impact of local infrastructure on new business establishments , 2016 .

[10]  Sándor Bozóki,et al.  Analysis of pairwise comparison matrices: an empirical research , 2013, Ann. Oper. Res..

[11]  John Aitchison,et al.  The Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data , 1986 .

[12]  Thomas Bauwens,et al.  What drives the development of community energy in Europe? The case of wind power cooperatives , 2016 .

[13]  Charles R. Warren,et al.  ‘Green On Green’: Public perceptions of wind power in Scotland and Ireland , 2005 .

[14]  Klaus Moeltner,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of Local Opposition to New Transmission Lines Across the EU-27 , 2016 .

[15]  Kate Burningham,et al.  An Array of Deficits: Unpacking NIMBY Discourses in Wind Energy Developers' Conceptualizations of Their Local Opponents , 2015 .

[16]  Eva Heiskanen,et al.  Modulating societal acceptance in new energy projects: Towards a toolkit methodology for project managers , 2009 .

[17]  David J. Weiss,et al.  How to Use Multiattribute Utility Measurement for Social Decisionmaking , 2008 .

[18]  Michael Kühn,et al.  Geological Underground will Contribute Significantly to the Implementation of the Energy Policy Towards Renewables in Germany , 2015 .

[19]  D. Horst NIMBY or not? Exploring the relevance of location and the politics of voiced opinions in renewable energy siting controversies , 2007 .

[20]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Planning of renewables schemes: Deliberative and fair decision-making on landscape issues instead of reproachful accusations of non-cooperation , 2007 .

[21]  J. S. Long,et al.  Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata, 2nd Edition , 2005 .

[22]  Dirk Scheer,et al.  Public evaluation of electricity technologies and future low-carbon portfolios in Germany and the USA , 2013 .

[23]  R. Gregory,et al.  Public perceptions of electric power transmission lines , 1988 .

[24]  N. Brennan,et al.  Wind farm externalities and public preferences for community consultation in Ireland: A discrete choice experiments approach , 2016 .

[25]  A. Spence,et al.  Uncertain climate: An investigation into public scepticism about anthropogenic climate change , 2011 .

[26]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  Explaining public preferences for high voltage pylon designs: An empirical study of perceived fit in a rural landscape , 2013 .

[27]  G. Assefa,et al.  Social sustainability and social acceptance in technology assessment: A case study of energy technologies , 2007 .

[28]  Nicholas Frank Pidgeon,et al.  Public perceptions of nuclear power, climate change and energy options in Britain: Summary findings of a survey conducted during Otober and November 2005 , 2006 .

[29]  Rolf Wüstenhagen,et al.  Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept , 2007 .

[30]  L. Steg,et al.  Psychological factors influencing sustainable energy technology acceptance: A review-based comprehensive framework , 2012 .

[31]  S. Shackley,et al.  The case of a proposed 21.5 MW(e) biomass Gasifier in Winkleigh, Devon: implications for governance of renewable energy planning , 2006 .

[32]  Anna Schreuer,et al.  The establishment of citizen power plants in Austria: A process of empowerment? , 2016 .

[33]  Patrick Devine-Wright,et al.  Explaining “NIMBY” Objections to a Power Line , 2013 .

[34]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Wind power and the NIMBY-myth: institutional capacity and the limited significance of public support , 2000 .

[35]  Antonella Battaglini,et al.  Perception of barriers for expansion of electricity grids in the European Union , 2012 .

[36]  Eric R. A. N. Smith,et al.  Explaining NIMBY Opposition to Wind Power , 2008 .

[37]  P. Stern,et al.  Personal and contextual influences on househould energy adaptations. , 1985 .

[38]  Richard T. Carson,et al.  A Common Nomenclature for Stated Preference Elicitation Approaches , 2011 .

[39]  C. Lawrence,et al.  Home is where the heart is: The effect of place of residence on place attachment and community participation , 2014 .

[40]  Patrick Devine-Wright,et al.  Discourses of Energy Infrastructure Development: A Q-Method Study of Electricity Transmission Line Siting in the UK , 2011 .

[41]  Petra Schweizer-Ries,et al.  Public acceptance of renewable energies: Results from case studies in Germany , 2008 .

[42]  D. Bell,et al.  The ‘Social Gap’ in Wind Farm Siting Decisions: Explanations and Policy Responses , 2005 .

[43]  F. Lootsma Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis via Ratio and Difference Judgement , 1999 .

[44]  W. Fichtner,et al.  Public acceptance and preferences related to renewable energy and grid expansion policy: Empirical insights for Germany , 2016 .

[45]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[46]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[47]  K. Gerald van den Boogaart,et al.  Analyzing Compositional Data with R , 2013 .

[48]  Jiří Franek,et al.  Judgment Scales and Consistency Measure in AHP , 2014 .

[49]  R. Madlener,et al.  The Impact of Wind Farms on Property Values: A Geographically Weighted Hedonic Pricing Model , 2012 .

[50]  Peng Ru,et al.  Not in my backyard, but not far away from me: Local acceptance of wind power in China , 2015 .

[51]  Kongjian Yu Cultural variations in landscape preference: comparisons among Chinese sub-groups and Western design experts , 1995 .

[52]  Stephen Ansolabehere,et al.  Public Attitudes Toward Construction of New Power Plants , 2009 .

[53]  F. Harrell,et al.  Partial Proportional Odds Models for Ordinal Response Variables , 1990 .

[54]  Eefje Cuppen,et al.  The role of dialogue in fostering acceptance of transmission lines: the case of a France–Spain interconnection project , 2013 .

[55]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Wind power implementation: The nature of public attitudes: Equity and fairness instead of ‘backyard motives’ , 2007 .

[56]  M. Ben-Akiva,et al.  Combining revealed and stated preferences data , 1994 .

[57]  Ward Edwards,et al.  How to Use Multiattribute Utility Measurement for Social Decisionmaking , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[58]  Kate Burningham,et al.  Using the Language of NIMBY: A topic for research, not an activity for researchers , 2000 .

[59]  David Toke,et al.  Wind Power in UK and Denmark: Can Rational Choice Help Explain Different Outcomes? , 2002 .

[60]  Hugh Kelley,et al.  What influences the probability of wind farm planning approval: Evidence from Ireland , 2015 .

[61]  Patrick Devine-Wright,et al.  Beyond NIMBYism: towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy , 2005 .

[62]  Bart W. Terwel,et al.  Going beyond the properties of CO2 capture and storage (CCS) technology: How trust in stakeholders affects public acceptance of CCS , 2011 .

[63]  P. Devine‐Wright Place attachment and public acceptance of renewable energy: A tidal energy case study , 2011 .

[64]  P. Stern,et al.  Influences on Attitude-Behavior Relationships , 1995 .

[65]  R. Hämäläinen,et al.  On the measurement of preferences in the analytic hierarchy process , 1997 .

[66]  Richard Williams Generalized Ordered Logit/Partial Proportional Odds Models for Ordinal Dependent Variables , 2006 .

[67]  Eija Pouta,et al.  Local residents’ perceptions of energy landscape: the case of transmission lines , 2011 .

[68]  W. Newey,et al.  Identification and estimation of marginal effects in nonlinear panel models , 2008 .

[69]  O. Kuik,et al.  Local acceptance of renewable energy - A case study from southeast Germany , 2011 .

[70]  Soo-Min Kim,et al.  Automatically Assessing Review Helpfulness , 2006, EMNLP.

[71]  P. Stern,et al.  The New Ecological Paradigm in Social-Psychological Context , 1995 .

[72]  M. Galesic,et al.  Effects of Questionnaire Length on Participation and Indicators of Response Quality in a Web Survey , 2009 .

[73]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. , 1977 .

[74]  Sebastian Bartel,et al.  Underground spatial planning – Perspectives and current research in Germany , 2016 .

[75]  David Bidwell,et al.  The role of values in public beliefs and attitudes towards commercial wind energy , 2013 .

[76]  E. F. Lane,et al.  A CONSISTENCY TEST FOR AHP DECISION MAKERS , 1989 .

[77]  Marit Vorkinn,et al.  Environmental Concern in a Local Context , 2001 .

[78]  P. Stern,et al.  Social Structural and Social Psychological Bases of Environmental Concern , 1998 .