A Case on ERP Custom Add-On in Taiwan: Implications to System Fit, Acceptance and Maintenance Costs

Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems are complete and complex information systems that consist of firms’ business best practices. This study examines an ERP custom-made add-on/bolt-on system of a medium-sized computer memory producer with global business units around the world, and investigates implications of the customized system from the perspectives of system fit, user attitude and acceptance, and subsequent maintenance and upgrade costs. The authors adopted a rich descriptive case study method and conduct a cost and benefit analysis prediction of subsequent maintenance and upgrade costs on the system. The empirical data indicates that although developing an add-on may create integration problems and/or compatibility problems with the ERP system, in overall, the system users accept the system better as the add-on helps in improving their job performance. Also, even though having a custom development does create additional costs in this case study, this does not necessarily cost more than not having it. Instead, having an idiosyncratic system may actually transfer a lot of benefits to the company. This is the first empirical study showing why custom development is favored by SMEs. These results and implications can be valuable to IT managers and top management when making ERP customization decisions.

[1]  Magdy Abdel-Kader,et al.  An Investigation of Enterprise Resource Planning Implementation in a Small Firm: A Study of Problems Encountered and Successes Achieved , 2011, Int. J. Enterp. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Norita B. Ahmad,et al.  Lessons Learned During a Decade of ERP Experience: A Case Study , 2009, Int. J. Enterp. Inf. Syst..

[3]  Marc N. Haines Understanding Enterprise System Customization: An Exploration of Implementation Realities and the Key Influence Factors , 2009, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[4]  João Varajão,et al.  Handbook of Research on Enterprise 2.0: Technological, Social, and Organizational Dimensions , 2013 .

[5]  Sia Siew Kien,et al.  Enterprise resource planning: cultural fits and misfits: is ERP a universal solution? , 2000, CACM.

[6]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance , 1995, MIS Q..

[7]  Ondrej Zach,et al.  ERP System Customization In SMEs: A Multiple Case Study , 2011, PACIS.

[8]  Jen-Her Wu,et al.  Empirically Testing User Characteristics and Fitness Factors in Enterprise Resource Planning Success , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[9]  Eric T. G. Wang,et al.  ERP Misfit: A Multidimensional Concept And Misfit Resolution , 2011, PACIS.

[10]  Celeste See Pui Ng,et al.  Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice a Decision Framework for Enterprise Resource Planning Maintenance and Upgrade: a Client Perspective , 2022 .

[11]  Shih-Wei Chou,et al.  The implementation factors that influence the ERP (enterprise resource planning) benefits , 2008, Decis. Support Syst..

[12]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[13]  Michael J. Shaw,et al.  Task-technology fit for mobile information systems , 2010, J. Inf. Technol..

[14]  Ronald Batenburg,et al.  Technical isomorphism at work: ERP-embedded similarity-enhancing mechanisms , 2008, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[15]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[16]  A. Cresswell,et al.  Assessing the Value of Investments in Government Interoperability , 2012 .

[17]  N. Elangovan,et al.  Response of Small Enterprises to the Pressures of ERP Adoption , 2012, Int. J. Enterp. Inf. Syst..

[18]  Pallab Saha,et al.  Enterprise architecture for connected e-government : practices and innovations / [edited by] Pallab Saha. , 2012 .

[19]  Jorge Marx Gómez,et al.  Developing and Customizing Federated ERP Systems , 2009, Int. J. Enterp. Inf. Syst..

[20]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs , 1999, Inf. Manag..

[21]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Tailoring ERP systems: a spectrum of choices and their implications , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[22]  Gary Klein,et al.  ERP Misfit: Country of Origin and Organizational Factors , 2006, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[23]  Guy G. Gable,et al.  Maintaining ERP packaged software – A revelatory case study , 2010, J. Inf. Technol..

[24]  Dale L. Goodhue,et al.  Development and Measurement Validity of a Task-Technology Fit Instrument for User Evaluations of Inf , 1998 .

[25]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  Implementing Packaged Software , 1987, MIS Q..

[26]  Alan M. Rugman,et al.  Case selection biases in management research: the implications for international business studies , 2010 .

[27]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  An experimental program investigating color-enhanced and graphical information presentation: an integration of the findings , 1986, CACM.

[28]  Ben Light,et al.  The maintenance implications of the customization of ERP software , 2001, J. Softw. Maintenance Res. Pract..

[29]  Yu Guo,et al.  An ASP-Based Product Customization Service Systems for SMEs: A Case Study in Construction Machinery , 2008, Int. J. Enterp. Inf. Syst..