Land-cover change dynamics and insights into ecosystem services in European stream riparian zones

Abstract Riparian zones, transitional environments between terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems, have been historically threatened in Europe by land reclamation and exploitation of their natural resources. These fragile environments deliver a large number of ecological and societal services, while simultaneously playing a key role in the maintenance of biodiversity in fragmented landscapes. At large scales, one of the clearest and most informative indicators of alteration of state and characteristics of ecological systems is land-cover change. A newly available European riparian zone distribution dataset and continental land-cover change information allowed us to obtain an unprecedented continental overview of riparian land conversion and associated drivers, as well as a broad indication of their loss of capacity to provide ecosystem services. The analysis shows that only 1.8% of riparian zones experienced land-cover changes in the period 2000–2006. The majority of riparian changes involved forest loss and forest regrowth due to forestry activities and, to a lesser extent, to fires. Approximately 9% of land-cover changes involved conversion to artificial and agricultural surface, with trajectories largely affecting their ecological integrity. Using land-cover proxy-based indicators we show that the loss of riparian zones’ capacity to support ecological integrity and ecosystem services was overall significantly higher than the proportion of converted surface. The methodological approach can be used to support the assessment of environmental policy targets, and for regional planning and management of riparian zones.

[1]  X. Pons,et al.  Land cover change in Europe between 1950 and 2000 determined employing aerial photography , 2010 .

[2]  M. Bossard,et al.  CORINE land cover technical guide - Addendum 2000 , 2000 .

[3]  F. Berkes,et al.  Exploring some of the myths of land use change: Can rural to urban migration drive declines in biodiversity? , 2011 .

[4]  J. M. Van Der Knijff,et al.  LISFLOOD : a GIS-based distributed model for river basin scale water balance and flood simulation , 2008 .

[5]  R. DeFries,et al.  Land‐use choices: balancing human needs and ecosystem function , 2004 .

[6]  Bodis Katalin,et al.  A pan-European River and Catchment Database , 2007 .

[7]  Edward P. Glenn,et al.  Book reviewRiparian Areas, Functions and Strategies for Management: National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2002, 428 pp. , 2003 .

[8]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  The impact of proxy‐based methods on mapping the distribution of ecosystem services , 2010 .

[9]  F. Müller Indicating ecosystem and landscape organisation , 2005 .

[10]  G. Daily,et al.  Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales , 2009 .

[11]  Minghua Zhang,et al.  A review of vegetated buffers and a meta-analysis of their mitigation efficacy in reducing nonpoint source pollution. , 2009, Journal of environmental quality.

[12]  I. Moreira,et al.  River plants from an Iberian basin and environmental factors influencing their distribution , 1999, Hydrobiologia.

[13]  M. Rosegrant,et al.  Water for Agriculture: Maintaining Food Security Under Growing Scarcity , 2009 .

[14]  Francisco Moreira,et al.  Wildfires as a major driver of landscape dynamics in three fire-prone areas of Portugal , 2011 .

[15]  R. O'Neill,et al.  The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital , 1997, Nature.

[16]  David P. Braun,et al.  Are We Conserving What We Say We Are? Measuring Ecological Integrity within Protected Areas , 2003 .

[17]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Global Consequences of Land Use , 2005, Science.

[18]  Klement Tockner,et al.  Aquatic Ecosystems: Flood plains: critically threatened ecosystems , 2008 .

[19]  D. Olson,et al.  The Global 200: A Representation Approach to Conserving the Earth’s Most Biologically Valuable Ecoregions , 1998 .

[20]  P. Strobl,et al.  Pan-European distribution modelling of stream riparian zones based on multi-source Earth Observation data , 2013 .

[21]  Malte Busch,et al.  Potentials of quantitative and qualitative approaches to assessing ecosystem services , 2012 .

[22]  G. Minshall,et al.  Wildfires and Yellowstone's Stream EcosystemsA temporal perspective shows that aquatic recovery parallels forest succession , 1989 .

[23]  Pol Coppin,et al.  Review ArticleDigital change detection methods in ecosystem monitoring: a review , 2004 .

[24]  B. Richter,et al.  Biodiversity Conservation at Multiple Scales: Functional Sites, Landscapes, and Networks , 2000 .

[25]  F. Müller,et al.  Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets , 2012 .

[26]  R. D. Groot,et al.  Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multi-functional landscapes , 2006 .

[27]  Robert J. Naiman,et al.  Fire in the Riparian Zone: Characteristics and Ecological Consequences , 2007, Ecosystems.

[28]  H. Mooney,et al.  Human Domination of Earth’s Ecosystems , 1997, Renewable Energy.

[29]  Peter Vogt,et al.  Ranking European regions as providers of structural riparian corridors for conservation and management purposes , 2013, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[30]  G. Daily Nature's services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. , 1998 .

[31]  P. Sutton,et al.  SPECIAL ISSUE: The Dynamics and Value of Ecosystem Services: Integrating Economic and Ecological Perspectives Global estimates of market and non-market values derived from nighttime satellite imagery, land cover, and ecosystem service valuation , 2002 .

[32]  Wilhelm Windhorst,et al.  Landscapes' Capacities to Provide Ecosystem Services - a Concept for Land-Cover Based Assessments , 2009 .

[33]  Juli G. Pausas Changes in Fire and Climate in the Eastern Iberian Peninsula (Mediterranean Basin) , 2004 .

[34]  J. Kay,et al.  Book reviews , 1997 .

[35]  M. Häkkilä Farms of northern Finland , 2002 .

[36]  Grazia Zulian,et al.  Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem service supply, biodiversity, and habitat conservation status in Europe , 2012 .

[37]  F. Moreira,et al.  Post-fire tree mortality in mixed forests of central Portugal , 2010 .

[38]  Andrew Simon,et al.  Riparian vegetation and fluvial geomorphology , 2004 .

[39]  G. Kondolf,et al.  Basic hydrologic studies for assessing impacts of flow diversions on riparian vegetation: Examples from streams of the eastern Sierra Nevada, California, USA , 1987 .

[40]  Paracchini Maria-Luisa,et al.  A European assessment of the provision of ecosystem services - Towards an atlas of ecosystem services , 2011 .

[41]  M. Svoboda,et al.  Dynamics of windthrow events in a natural fir-beech forest in the Carpathian mountains , 2009 .

[42]  R. Naiman,et al.  Riparia: Ecology, Conservation, and Management of Streamside Communities , 2005 .

[43]  The Drivers of Housing Cycles in Spain , 2009 .

[44]  R. Costanza,et al.  Global Conservation of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services , 2007 .

[45]  M. Koehl,et al.  State of Europe's Forests 2007: The MCPFE Report on Sustainable Forest Management in Europe , 2007 .

[46]  Carmen Revenga,et al.  Pilot analysis of global ecosystems : freshwater systems , 2000 .

[47]  Stephen R. Carpenter,et al.  Global change and freshwater ecosystems , 1992 .

[48]  K. Tockner,et al.  Riverine flood plains: present state and future trends , 2002, Environmental Conservation.

[49]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. , 2000, Science.

[50]  J. W. Gilliam,et al.  Sediment and Chemical Load Reduction by Grass and Riparian Filters , 1996 .

[51]  Etienne E. Kerre,et al.  Defuzzification: criteria and classification , 1999, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[52]  M. Plummer,et al.  Assessing benefit transfer for the valuation of ecosystem services , 2009 .

[53]  R. Naiman,et al.  The Role of Riparian Corridors in Maintaining Regional Biodiversity. , 1993, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[54]  Christer Nilsson,et al.  The Fragility of Ecosystems: A Review , 1995 .

[55]  E. S. Verry,et al.  Riparian ecotone: A functional definition and delineation for resource assessment , 2004 .

[56]  R. Naiman,et al.  Flood-deposited wood debris and its contribution to heterogeneity and regeneration in a semi-arid riparian landscape , 2005, Oecologia.

[57]  José M. C. Pereira,et al.  Synoptic patterns associated with large summer forest fires in Portugal , 2005 .

[58]  Guy Pautou,et al.  Historical influence of man on the riparian dynamics of a fluvial landscape , 1988, Landscape Ecology.

[59]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment , 2002 .

[60]  Maciej Zalewski,et al.  Energy, water, plant interactions: ‘green feedback’ as a mechanism for environmental management and control through the application of phytotechnology and ecohydrology , 2003 .

[61]  Wilhelm Windhorst,et al.  Ökologische Integrität: Risikovorsorge im nachhaltigen Landschaftsmanagement , 2001 .

[62]  Eric F. Lambin,et al.  Land-use and land-cover change : local processes and global impacts , 2010 .

[63]  Roy Haines-Young,et al.  Indicators of ecosystem service potential at European scales: Mapping marginal changes and trade-offs , 2012 .

[64]  Cameron S Gillies,et al.  Riparian corridors enhance movement of a forest specialist bird in fragmented tropical forest , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[65]  Paracchini Maria-Luisa,et al.  Riparian zones: where green and blue networks meet. Pan-European zonation modelling based on remote sensing and GIS , 2011 .

[66]  A. McMichael,et al.  Ecosystems and Human well-being , 2003 .