Analysis of Communication Demands of Networked Control Systems for Autonomous Platooning

In autonomous platooning of vehicles, robust Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control (CACC) systems are required for guaranteeing reliable and stable driving performance. Cruise control systems should meet two requirements: prevent collisions between vehicles in any event and prevent amplification of distance errors along the platoon. The absence of one of these requirements causes weak road utilization and fuel efficiency and eventually leads to decreased safety. By usage of suitable control system parameters and deployment of appropriate means of communication between members of a platoon, these risks may be minimized. In this research, an evaluation platform for stability and risk-of-collision of autonomous vehicle platoons is developed. It allows for performance analysis for a large range of controller specifications and network characteristics by extensive simulation based on real-world vehicle parameters. The experiments show platoon performance limits caused by communication constraints and control system specifications. First results suggest that the choice of controller parameters strongly affects communication system requirements. Larger distances and more aggressive controller gains can reduce demands on the radio link to a great extent. The contribution of this work is twofold: firstly, platoon performance of correlated network errors is evaluated broadly and secondly, performance dependencies between communication limitations and the control design are shown.

[1]  Francois Dion,et al.  Vehicle Platoon Control in High-Latency Wireless Communications Environment , 2012 .

[2]  João Pedro Hespanha,et al.  A Survey of Recent Results in Networked Control Systems , 2007, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[3]  Andrea Goldsmith,et al.  Effects of communication delay on string stability in vehicle platoons , 2001, ITSC 2001. 2001 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems. Proceedings (Cat. No.01TH8585).

[4]  E. O. Elliott Estimates of error rates for codes on burst-noise channels , 1963 .

[5]  Myung J. Lee,et al.  A Comprehensive Performance Study of IEEE 802 . 15 . 4 , 2004 .

[6]  Jeroen Ploeg,et al.  Evaluation of CACC string stability using SUMO, Simulink, and OMNeT++ , 2012, EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking.

[7]  E. Gilbert Capacity of a burst-noise channel , 1960 .

[8]  Peter Seiler,et al.  Estimation with lossy measurements: jump estimators for jump systems , 2003, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[9]  Javier Sanchez,et al.  Safe Road Trains for Environment: Human Factors' Aspects in Dual Mode Transport Systems , 2010 .

[10]  Sara Moridpour Evaluating the time headway distributions in congested highways , 2014 .

[11]  D. Swaroop,et al.  String Stability Of Interconnected Systems: An Application To Platooning In Automated Highway Systems , 1997 .

[12]  Amaury Nègre,et al.  Probabilistic Analysis of Dynamic Scenes and Collision Risks Assessment to Improve Driving Safety , 2011, IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine.

[13]  Nathan van de Wouw,et al.  Design and experimental evaluation of cooperative adaptive cruise control , 2011, 2011 14th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[14]  Huei Peng,et al.  String stability analysis of adaptive cruise controlled vehicles , 2000 .

[15]  Mario Gerla,et al.  Towards inter-vehicle communication strategies for platooning support , 2014, 2014 7th International Workshop on Communication Technologies for Vehicles (Nets4Cars-Fall).

[16]  Paul J. Kühn,et al.  Performance modeling of networked control systems , 2017, 2017 9th International Congress on Ultra Modern Telecommunications and Control Systems and Workshops (ICUMT).

[17]  Nathan van de Wouw,et al.  Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control: Network-Aware Analysis of String Stability , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.