The association of white matter connectivity with prevalence, incidence and course of depressive symptoms: The Maastricht Study

BACKGROUND Altered white matter brain connectivity has been linked to depression. The aim of this study was to investigate the association of markers of white matter connectivity with prevalence, incidence and course of depressive symptoms. METHODS Markers of white matter connectivity (node degree, clustering coefficient, local efficiency, characteristic path length, and global efficiency) were assessed at baseline by 3 T MRI in the population-based Maastricht Study (n = 4866; mean ± standard deviation age 59.6 ± 8.5 years, 49.0% women; 17 406 person-years of follow-up). Depressive symptoms (9-item Patient Health Questionnaire; PHQ-9) were assessed at baseline and annually over seven years of follow-up. Major depressive disorder (MDD) was assessed with the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview at baseline only. We used negative binominal, logistic and Cox regression analyses, and adjusted for demographic, cardiovascular, and lifestyle risk factors. RESULTS A lower global average node degree at baseline was associated with the prevalence and persistence of clinically relevant depressive symptoms [PHQ-9 ⩾ 10; OR (95% confidence interval) per standard deviation = 1.21 (1.05-1.39) and OR = 1.21 (1.02-1.44), respectively], after full adjustment. On the contrary, no associations were found of global average node degree with the MDD at baseline [OR 1.12 (0.94-1.32) nor incidence or remission of clinically relevant depressive symptoms [HR = 1.05 (0.95-1.17) and OR 1.08 (0.83-1.41), respectively]. Other connectivity measures of white matter organization were not associated with depression. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that fewer white matter connections may contribute to prevalent depressive symptoms and its persistence but not to incident depression. Future studies are needed to replicate our findings.

[1]  Timothy O. Laumann,et al.  Reproducible brain-wide association studies require thousands of individuals , 2022, Nature.

[2]  F. Verhey,et al.  The association of markers of cerebral small vessel disease and brain atrophy with incidence and course of depressive symptoms - the maastricht study. , 2021, Journal of affective disorders.

[3]  Simon B Eickhoff,et al.  Multimodal Abnormalities of Brain Structure and Function in Major Depressive Disorder: A Meta-Analysis of Neuroimaging Studies. , 2020, The American journal of psychiatry.

[4]  Michael H. Connors,et al.  Pseudodementia, pseudo‐pseudodementia, and pseudodepression , 2020, Alzheimer's & dementia.

[5]  Paul M. Thompson,et al.  White matter microstructural alterations across four major psychiatric disorders: mega-analysis study in 2937 individuals , 2019, Molecular Psychiatry.

[6]  G. Kranz,et al.  Rumination network dysfunction in major depression: A brain connectome study , 2019, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry.

[7]  P. Dagnelie,et al.  White Matter Connectivity Abnormalities in Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes: The Maastricht Study , 2019, Diabetes Care.

[8]  J. Mintzer,et al.  Lifestyle Choices and Brain Health , 2019, Frontiers in Medicine.

[9]  Y. D. van der Werf,et al.  Associations between modifiable risk factors and white matter of the aging brain: insights from diffusion tensor imaging studies , 2019, Neurobiology of Aging.

[10]  Z. Yao,et al.  Structural alterations of the brain preceded functional alterations in major depressive disorder patients: Evidence from multimodal connectivity. , 2019, Journal of affective disorders.

[11]  Mark E. Bastin,et al.  The effect of network thresholding and weighting on structural brain networks in the UK Biobank , 2019, NeuroImage.

[12]  H. Johansen-Berg,et al.  White Matter Plasticity in the Adult Brain , 2017, Neuron.

[13]  F. Pouwer,et al.  Association of Microvascular Dysfunction With Late-Life Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis , 2017, JAMA psychiatry.

[14]  Sen Song,et al.  Decreased between‐hemisphere connectivity strength and network efficiency in geriatric depression , 2017, Human brain mapping.

[15]  K. Jellinger,et al.  Vascular depression consensus report – a critical update , 2016, BMC Medicine.

[16]  P. Dagnelie,et al.  The Patient Health Questionnaire‐9 as a Screening Tool for Depression in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The Maastricht Study , 2016, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[17]  Q. Gong,et al.  Brain gray matter alterations in first episodes of depression: A meta-analysis of whole-brain studies , 2016, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[18]  K. Boström,et al.  Which instruments to support diagnosis of depression have sufficient accuracy? A systematic review , 2015, Nordic journal of psychiatry.

[19]  Q. Gong,et al.  Depression, Neuroimaging and Connectomics: A Selective Overview , 2015, Biological Psychiatry.

[20]  Rui Yan,et al.  Abnormal brain anatomical topological organization of the cognitive‐emotional and the frontoparietal circuitry in major depressive disorder , 2014, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  L. Williams,et al.  Abnormal Structural Networks Characterize Major Depressive Disorder: A Connectome Analysis , 2014, Biological Psychiatry.

[22]  P. Dagnelie,et al.  The Maastricht Study: an extensive phenotyping study on determinants of type 2 diabetes, its complications and its comorbidities , 2014, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[23]  Asta K. Håberg,et al.  Does health differ between participants and non-participants in the MRI-HUNT study, a population based neuroimaging study? The Nord-Trøndelag health studies 1984–2009 , 2012, BMC Medical Imaging.

[24]  E. Feskens,et al.  The Dutch Healthy Diet index (DHD-index): an instrument to measure adherence to the Dutch Guidelines for a Healthy Diet , 2012, Nutrition Journal.

[25]  Y. Sheline,et al.  Biological Basis of Late Life Depression , 2012, Current Psychiatry Reports.

[26]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations , 2010, NeuroImage.

[27]  C J Stam,et al.  Characterization of anatomical and functional connectivity in the brain: a complex networks perspective. , 2010, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[28]  O. Sporns,et al.  Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[29]  M. Furey,et al.  Brain structural and functional abnormalities in mood disorders: implications for neurocircuitry models of depression , 2008, Brain Structure and Function.

[30]  G. Alexopoulos The Vascular Depression Hypothesis: 10 Years Later , 2006, Biological Psychiatry.

[31]  R. Spitzer,et al.  The PHQ-9 , 2001, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[32]  A. Stewart,et al.  An evaluation of three self-report physical activity instruments for older adults. , 2001, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[33]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[34]  K. Krishnan,et al.  MRI-defined vascular depression. , 1997, The American journal of psychiatry.

[35]  J. Price,et al.  Neurocircuitry of Mood Disorders , 2010, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[36]  D. Sheehan,et al.  The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. , 1998, The Journal of clinical psychiatry.

[37]  G. A. Rose The diagnosis of ischaemic heart pain and intermittent claudication in field surveys. , 1962, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.