Self-testing of Pauli observables for device-independent entanglement certification

We present self-testing protocols to certify the presence of tensor products of Pauli measurements on maximally entangled states of local dimension $2^n$ for $n\in\mathbb{N}$. This provides self-tests of sets of informationally complete measurements in arbitrarily high dimension. We then show that this can be used for the device-independent certification of the entanglement of all bipartite entangled states by exploiting a connection to measurement device-independent entanglement witnesses and quantum networks. This work extends a more compact parallel work on the same subject and provides all the required technical proofs.

[1]  Gebräuchliche Fertigarzneimittel,et al.  V , 1893, Therapielexikon Neurologie.

[2]  J. Bell.  On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox , 1964 .

[3]  A. Shimony,et al.  Proposed Experiment to Test Local Hidden Variable Theories. , 1969 .

[4]  R. Lathe.  Phd by thesis , 1988, Nature.

[5]  Werner,et al.  Quantum states with Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations admitting a hidden-variable model. , 1989, Physical review. A, General physics.

[6]  M. Horodecki,et al.  Separability of mixed states: necessary and sufficient conditions , 1996, quant-ph/9605038.

[7]  J. Barrett.  Nonsequential positive-operator-valued measurements on entangled mixed states do not always violate a Bell inequality , 2001, quant-ph/0107045.

[8]  Andrew Chi-Chih Yao,et al.  Self testing quantum apparatus , 2004, Quantum Inf. Comput..

[9]  Adrian Kent,et al.  No signaling and quantum key distribution. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[10]  N. Gisin,et al.  Grothendieck's constant and local models for noisy entangled quantum states , 2006, quant-ph/0606138.

[11]  V. Scarani,et al.  Device-independent security of quantum cryptography against collective attacks. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[12]  V. Scarani,et al.  Testing the dimension of Hilbert spaces. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[13]  Roger Colbeck,et al.  Quantum And Relativistic Protocols For Secure Multi-Party Computation , 2009, 0911.3814.

[14]  Stefano Pironio,et al.  Random numbers certified by Bell’s theorem , 2009, Nature.

[15]  N. Gisin,et al.  Characterizing the nonlocal correlations created via entanglement swapping. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[16]  Michele Mosca,et al.  Generalized Self-testing and the Security of the 6-State Protocol , 2010, TQC.

[17]  J. Skaar,et al.  Hacking commercial quantum cryptography systems by tailored bright illumination , 2010, 1008.4593.

[18]  T. H. Yang,et al.  Robust self-testing of the singlet , 2012, 1203.2976.

[19]  Francesco Buscemi,et al.  All entangled quantum states are nonlocal. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[20]  Stefano Pirandola,et al.  Side-channel-free quantum key distribution. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[21]  M. Curty,et al.  Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[22]  A. E. Rastegin,et al.  Relations for Certain Symmetric Norms and Anti-norms Before and After Partial Trace , 2012, 1202.3853.

[23]  N. Gisin,et al.  Bilocal versus nonbilocal correlations in entanglement-swapping experiments , 2011, 1112.4502.

[24]  R. Renner,et al.  Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution with Local Bell Test , 2012, 1208.0023.

[25]  Nicolas Gisin,et al.  Imperfect measurement settings: Implications for quantum state tomography and entanglement witnesses , 2012, 1203.0911.

[26]  Nicolas Gisin,et al.  Measurement-device-independent entanglement witnesses for all entangled quantum states. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[27]  Miguel Navascues,et al.  Robust Self Testing of Unknown Quantum Systems into Any Entangled Two-Qubit States , 2013 .

[28]  S. Wehner,et al.  Bell Nonlocality , 2013, 1303.2849.

[29]  Remigiusz Augusiak,et al.  Local hidden–variable models for entangled quantum states , 2014, 1405.7321.

[30]  Umesh Vazirani,et al.  Fully device-independent quantum key distribution. , 2012, 1210.1810.

[31]  Ivan vSupi'c,et al.  Self-testing protocols based on the chained Bell inequalities , 2015, 1511.09220.

[32]  Christian Kurtsiefer,et al.  Approaching Tsirelson's Bound in a Photon Pair Experiment. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[33]  Stefano Pironio,et al.  Sum-of-squares decompositions for a family of Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt-like inequalities and their application to self-testing , 2015, 1504.06960.

[34]  Matthew McKague,et al.  Self-testing in parallel with CHSH , 2016, 1609.09584.

[35]  Jędrzej Kaniewski,et al.  Analytic and Nearly Optimal Self-Testing Bounds for the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt and Mermin Inequalities. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[36]  Marco T'ulio Quintino,et al.  Better local hidden variable models for two-qubit Werner states and an upper bound on the Grothendieck constant $K_G(3)$ , 2016, 1609.06114.

[37]  Jean-Daniel Bancal,et al.  Device-independent parallel self-testing of two singlets , 2015, 1512.02074.

[38]  Omar Fawzi,et al.  Entropy Accumulation , 2016, Communications in Mathematical Physics.

[39]  Stefano Pironio,et al.  Optimal randomness certification from one entangled bit , 2015, 1505.03837.

[40]  Matthew McKague,et al.  Self-testing in parallel , 2015, 1511.04194.

[41]  H Zbinden,et al.  Resource-Efficient Measurement-Device-Independent Entanglement Witness. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[42]  Antonio Acín,et al.  Certified randomness in quantum physics , 2016, Nature.

[43]  Matthew Coudron,et al.  The Parallel-Repeated Magic Square Game is Rigid , 2016, 1609.06306.

[44]  Andrea Coladangelo,et al.  Parallel self-testing of (tilted) EPR pairs via copies of (tilted) CHSH and the magic square game , 2016, Quantum Inf. Comput..

[45]  A. Cabello,et al.  Self-testing properties of Gisin's elegant Bell inequality , 2017, 1706.02130.

[46]  Valerio Scarani,et al.  All pure bipartite entangled states can be self-tested , 2016, Nature Communications.

[47]  Jkedrzej Kaniewski,et al.  Self-testing of binary observables based on commutation , 2017, 1702.06845.

[48]  Antonio Acín,et al.  Device-Independent Entanglement Certification of All Entangled States. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[49]  R. Sarpong,et al.  Bio-inspired synthesis of xishacorenes A, B, and C, and a new congener from fuscol† †Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c9sc02572c , 2019, Chemical science.

[50]  S. G'omez,et al.  Experimental nonlocality-based randomness generation with nonprojective measurements , 2017, Quantum Information and Measurement (QIM) V: Quantum Technologies.

[51]  Andrea Coladangelo,et al.  Self-testing multipartite entangled states through projections onto two systems , 2017, New Journal of Physics.

[52]  Thomas Vidick,et al.  Simple and tight device-independent security proofs , 2016, SIAM J. Comput..

[53]  Stacey Jeffery,et al.  Verifier-on-a-Leash: new schemes for verifiable delegated quantum computation, with quasilinear resources , 2017, IACR Cryptol. ePrint Arch..