Environmental impact assessment of three coal-based electricity generation scenarios in China

A life cycle assessment was conducted out to estimate the environmental impact of three coal-based electricity generation scenarios commonly used or encouraged in China, namely, sub-critical technology (300 MW), supercritical technology (600 MW), and ultra-supercritical technology (1000 MW). Compared with other scenarios, the ultra-supercritical technology accounted for significantly environmental benefits in most categories, except in the natural land occupation category because of the landfill disposal of coal ash. Optimizing net coal consumption efficiency, reusing coal ash as building material, increasing desulfurization and denitrization system efficiency, and decreasing the road transport distance from coal buyer to supplier are key factors in reducing the overall environmental impact of electricity generation.

[1]  T. M. Lai,et al.  Fuel life cycle emissions for electricity consumption in the world’s gaming center–Macao SAR, China , 2011 .

[2]  Xiao Bin,et al.  Comparing Chinese Clean Coal Power Generation Technologies with Life Cycle Inventory , 2011 .

[3]  Gerald Rebitzer,et al.  IMPACT 2002+: A new life cycle impact assessment methodology , 2003 .

[4]  Kei Yamashita,et al.  Energyplexes for the 21st century: Coal gasification for co-producing hydrogen, electricity and liquid fuels , 2005 .

[5]  Adisa Azapagic,et al.  Life cycle assessment of electricity generation in Mexico , 2011 .

[6]  Xiao Bin,et al.  Life Cycle Inventory of Clean Coal-fired Power Generation in China , 2005 .

[7]  Huang Zhi-xian,et al.  Life cycle assessment of coal-fired power generation and its alternatives , 2009 .

[8]  C. Bouallou,et al.  Efficiency of an Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) power plant including CO2 removal , 2008 .

[9]  Tieyong Zuo,et al.  Life cycle inventory for electricity generation in China , 2007 .

[10]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment , 2005 .

[11]  WU Yan-xiang.  Environmental benefit of electricity generated by natural gas , 2009 .

[12]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  Normalisation in product life cycle assessment: an LCA of the global and European economic systems in the year 2000. , 2008, The Science of the total environment.

[13]  Lutz Weischer,et al.  China, the United States, and the Climate Change Challenge , 2009 .

[14]  Tim Cockerill,et al.  Life cycle analysis of UK coal fired power plants , 2008 .

[15]  Xunmin Ou,et al.  Life-cycle energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions for electricity generation and supply in China , 2011 .

[16]  Nie Zuo-ren,et al.  Life cycle emission inventories for the fuels consumed by thermal power in China , 2005 .

[17]  M. Goedkoop,et al.  The Eco-indicator 99, A damage oriented method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment , 1999 .

[18]  Wang Jiao-e,et al.  Regularity and Pattern of Chinese Coal Resources Flow Field , 2009 .

[19]  André Faaij,et al.  Production of FT transportation fuels from biomass; technical options, process analysis and optimisation, and development potential , 2004 .

[20]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  Characterization factors for global warming in life cycle assessment based on damages to humans and ecosystems. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[21]  Enrico Benetto,et al.  Life cycle assessment of fossil CO2 emissions reduction scenarios in coal-biomass based electricity production , 2004 .