A Concentration Rebound Method for Measuring Particle Penetration and Deposition in the Indoor Environment

Continuous, size resolved particle measurements were performed in two houses in order to determine size-dependent particle penetration into and deposition in the indoor environment. The experiments consisted of three parts: (1) measurement of the particle loss rate following artificial elevation of indoor particle concentrations, (2) rapid reduction in particle concentration through induced ventilation by pressurization of the houses with HEPA-filtered air, and (3) measurement of the particle concentration rebound after house pressurization stopped. During the particle concentration decay period, when indoor concentrations are very high, losses due to deposition are large compared to gains due to particle infiltration. During the concentration rebound period, the opposite is true. The large variation in indoor concentration allows the effects of penetration and deposition losses to be separated by the transient, two-parameter model we employed to analyze the data. For the two houses studied, we found that as particles increased in diameter from 0.1 to 10 w m, penetration factors ranged from ∼1 to 0.3 and deposition loss rates ranged from 0.1 and 5 h m 1 . The decline in penetration factor with increasing particle size was less pronounced in the house with the larger normalized leakage area.

[1]  David Littlejohn,et al.  Automated measurements of ammonia and nitric acid in indoor and outdoor air. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  J. Roed,et al.  Relationship Between Indoor and Outdoor Aerosol Concentration Following the Chernobyl Accident , 1987 .

[3]  David T. Grimsrud,et al.  Control of respirable particles in indoor air with portable air cleaners , 1985 .

[4]  R. Sextro,et al.  Deposition of Tobacco Smoke Particles in a Low Ventilation Room , 1994 .

[5]  Antony J. H. Goddard,et al.  Stable tracer aerosol deposition measurements in a test chamber , 1995 .

[6]  William W. Nazaroff,et al.  Particle Penetration Through Building Cracks , 2003 .

[7]  Refrigerating.  ASHRAE handbook of fundamentals , 1967 .

[8]  P. L. Jenkins,et al.  Activity patterns of Californians: Use of and proximity to indoor pollutant sources , 1992 .

[9]  J. Schwartz,et al.  The National Morbidity, Mortality, and Air Pollution Study. Part II: Morbidity and mortality from air pollution in the United States. , 2000, Research report.

[10]  P. Lawless,et al.  Characterization of Indoor-Outdoor Aerosol Concentration Relationships during the Fresno PM Exposure Studies , 2001 .

[11]  Paul J. Catalano,et al.  Relative contribution of outdoor and indoor particle sources to indoor concentrations , 2000 .

[12]  M. H. Sherman,et al.  Airtightness of U.S. dwellings , 1998 .

[13]  C. Pope,et al.  Health effects of particulate air pollution: time for reassessment? , 1995, Environmental health perspectives.

[14]  Thomas E McKone,et al.  Indoor particulate matter of outdoor origin: importance of size-dependent removal mechanisms. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[15]  Tracy L. Thatcher,et al.  Effects of room furnishings and air speed on particle deposition rates indoors , 2002 .

[16]  Tracy L. Thatcher,et al.  Deposition, resuspension, and penetration of particles within a residence , 1995 .

[17]  Nance E. Matson,et al.  Air tightness of new houses in the U.S.: A preliminary report , 2002 .

[18]  L. Wallace,et al.  Indoor particles: a review. , 1996, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[19]  Max H. Sherman,et al.  Residential ventilation and energy characteristics , 1997 .

[20]  Petros Koutrakis,et al.  Source apportionment of indoor aerosols in Suffolk and Onondaga counties, New York , 1992 .

[21]  Christopher Yu Hang Chao,et al.  An empirical model for outdoor contaminant transmission into residential buildings and experimental verification , 2001 .

[22]  P J Catalano,et al.  Using time- and size-resolved particulate data to quantify indoor penetration and deposition behavior. , 2001, Environmental science & technology.

[23]  C. V. Chester,et al.  Emergency Protection from Aerosols , 1981 .

[24]  T. L. Thatcher,et al.  Use of time- and chemically resolved particulate data to characterize the infiltration of outdoor PM2.5 into a residence in the San Joaquin Valley. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[25]  Peter H. McMurry,et al.  AIR AND AEROSOL INFILTRATION IN HOMES. , 1985 .

[26]  S Lewis.  Solid particle penetration into enclosures , 1995 .

[27]  W. John,et al.  Modes in the size distributions of atmospheric inorganic aerosol , 1990 .

[28]  William J. Fisk,et al.  Factors affecting the concentration of outdoor particles indoors (COPI): Identification of data needs and existing data , 2001 .

[29]  W. Ott,et al.  Predicting Particulate (PM10) Personal Exposure Distributions Using a Random Component Superposition Statistical Model , 2000, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[30]  John Burnett,et al.  A methodology to investigate the particulate penetration coefficient through building shell , 1999 .

[31]  L. E. Sparks,et al.  Penetration of Ambient Fine Particles into the Indoor Environment , 2001 .

[32]  Susanne V. Hering,et al.  Method for the Automated Measurement of Fine Particle Nitrate in the Atmosphere , 2000 .

[33]  De-Ling Liu,et al.  Modeling pollutant penetration across building envelopes , 2001 .

[34]  Antony J. H. Goddard,et al.  Size specific indoor aerosol deposition measurements and derived I/O concentrations ratios , 1997 .