Detecting quantum light

The quantization of light is the basis for quantum optics and has led to the observation of a multitude of genuine quantum effects which cannot be explained by classical physics. Yet, there exist different views when we refer to the distinct quantum character of light as opposed to classical fields. A major impact on how we describe photonic states is caused by the detection method we use for the quantum state characterization. In the theoretical modelling measuring light always means the recording of photon statistics of some kind, though the way we interpret the results is quite different and depends mainly on the intensity of actual detected light. If we use conventional photodiodes and monitor bright light, we attribute the detected statistics to quadrature measurements in a phase space representation, or—in other words—we identify the quantum state by studying its uncertainties of its field amplitude and phase properties which correspond to conjugate quantum observables. For multi-photon states with very low intensity we have to employ avalanche photodiodes (APDs) to be able to see any signal, but photon number resolution seems difficult in this regime. Recent developments allow one to ascertain information about the photon statistics from APD measurements opening up new routes for characterizing photonic states. In this article we review the different methods for modern quantum state metrology where we include theoretical aspects as well as the description of the state-of-the-art technology for measuring photon statistics.

[1]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[2]  S. Braunstein,et al.  Quantum Information with Continuous Variables , 2004, quant-ph/0410100.

[3]  M. Sasaki,et al.  Photon-number-resolving detection at a telecommunications wavelength with a charge-integration photon detector. , 2005, Optics letters.

[4]  Stephen M. Barnett,et al.  Methods in Theoretical Quantum Optics , 1997 .

[5]  Christine Silberhorn,et al.  Direct, loss-tolerant characterization of nonclassical photon statistics. , 2006, Physical Review Letters.

[6]  H. Paul,et al.  Measuring the quantum state of light , 1997 .

[7]  Christine Silberhorn,et al.  Spectral structure and decompositions of optical states, and their applications , 2006, quant-ph/0609004.

[8]  장윤희,et al.  Y. , 2003, Industrial and Labor Relations Terms.

[9]  Pulsed homodyne measurements of femtosecond squeezed pulses generated by single-pass parametric deamplification. , 2004, Optics letters.

[10]  Banaszek,et al.  Direct probing of quantum phase space by photon counting. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[11]  Francesco Marin,et al.  Time-domain analysis of quantum states of light: noise characterization and homodyne tomography , 2002 .

[12]  Sae Woo Nam,et al.  Detection of single infrared, optical, and ultraviolet photons using superconducting transition edge sensors , 1998 .

[13]  Christine Silberhorn,et al.  Fiber-assisted detection with photon number resolution. , 2003, Optics letters.

[14]  Marco Genovese,et al.  Experimental reconstruction of photon statistics without photon counting. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[15]  Paul,et al.  Photon chopping: New way to measure the quantum state of light. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[16]  J. D. Franson,et al.  Photon-number resolution using time-multiplexed single-photon detectors , 2003, quant-ph/0305193.

[17]  H. Coldenstrodt-Ronge,et al.  Avalanche photo-detection for high data rate applications , 2007, 0709.3053.

[18]  Mark Beck,et al.  Ultrafast measurement of optical-field statistics by dc-balanced homodyne detection , 1995 .

[19]  Konrad Banaszek,et al.  Photon counting with a loop detector. , 2003, Optics letters.

[20]  Thomas de Quincey [C] , 2000, The Works of Thomas De Quincey, Vol. 1: Writings, 1799–1820.

[21]  S. Schiller,et al.  Measurement of the quantum states of squeezed light , 1997, Nature.

[22]  J. Wenger,et al.  Pulsed squeezed vacuum measurements without homodyning , 2004 .

[23]  Shigeki Takeuchi,et al.  Multiphoton detection using visible light photon counter , 1999 .

[24]  K Mølmer,et al.  Generation of a superposition of odd photon number states for quantum information networks. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[25]  J. Shapiro,et al.  Photon-counting statistics of pulsed light sources. , 1982, Optics letters.

[26]  Photon number resolving detection using time-multiplexing , 2004 .

[27]  G. Leuchs Squeezing the quantum fluctuations of light , 1988 .

[28]  Samuel L. Braunstein,et al.  Detection devices in entanglement-based optical state preparation , 2001 .

[29]  L. Mandel,et al.  Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics , 1995 .

[30]  A. Lvovsky,et al.  Ultrasensitive pulsed, balanced homodyne detector: application to time-domain quantum measurements. , 2001, Optics letters.

[31]  Beck,et al.  Measurement of the Wigner distribution and the density matrix of a light mode using optical homodyne tomography: Application to squeezed states and the vacuum. , 1993, Physical review letters.

[32]  Julien Laurat,et al.  Generating Optical Schrödinger Kittens for Quantum Information Processing , 2006, Science.

[33]  William Lo,et al.  New photon detector for device analysis: Superconducting single-photon detector based on a hot electron effect , 2001 .

[34]  Sae Woo Nam,et al.  Single photon source characterization with a superconducting single photon detector , 2005, 2006 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics and 2006 Quantum Electronics and Laser Science Conference.

[35]  J Eisert,et al.  Distilling Gaussian states with Gaussian operations is impossible. , 2002, Physical review letters.