Targeting Energy Management : Analysing targets, outcomes and impacts of corporate energy and greenhouse gas management programmes

Global greenhouse gas emissions must be reduced drastically to limit global increases in temperature to the relatively safe level of maximum 2 degrees Celsius. In the coming decades, energy efficiency improvement will be the main strategy for reducing energy-related greenhouse gas emissions. Energy management is frequently considered as an important means to stimulate energy efficiency improvement. However there is a clear need to understand what the impact of such programmes is. This thesis therefor addresses the following question: “What is the impact of energy and greenhouse gas management programmes on improving corporate energy management practices, accelerating energy efficiency improvement and CO2 emission reduction?”. This research question will be studied by means of two different cases of energy and greenhouse gas management programmes, i.e. the Long-Term Agreements on Energy Efficiency and the CO2 Performance Ladder. In this thesis a wide range of methodologies rooted in evaluation research have been used, to assess the implementation process, outcomes and impacts of the energy and greenhouse gas management programmes. Overall, it can be concluded that 1) programmes for energy and greenhouse gas management can be an effective tool for improving energy management practices, such as top management commitment, increased priority for energy issues, enhanced co-ordinated actions, improved insight in CO2 emissions, performance and reduction options, and target-setting; 2) these programmes can stimulate the adoption of additional energy conservation measures. The magnitude of the additionality which is in the range of 25-50%; 3) these programmes can accelerate energy efficiency improvement or reducing greenhouse gas emission beyond business-as-usual in at least the short-to-medium long term. In the energy and greenhouse gas management programmes considered in this study we found that both energy efficiency and relative CO2 emission reductions were enhanced within a range of 0.3%/yr - 1.0%/yr beyond autonomous improvements. Such programmes for energy and greenhouse gas management can therefore make an important contribution to achieving national energy and climate objectives. However, the values for enhanced energy efficiency improvement and CO2 emission reduction are far from sufficient to meet climate goals in the long-term. To guarantee higher impacts of such programmes in the longer term, it is necessary that these programmes are being reinforced, e.g. by aligning corporate greenhouse gas emission reduction targets with long-term climate goals, by engaging the supply chain companies in reducing CO2 emissions, by making stronger incentive and supporting schemes available, and by stronger regulatory threats in the case of non-compliance.

[1]  W. Pizer The case for intensity targets , 2005 .

[2]  G. Boyd,et al.  Voluntary Agreements with Industry , 1999 .

[3]  Su-Yol Lee,et al.  Corporate Carbon Strategies in Responding to Climate Change , 2012 .

[4]  Barriers to energy efficiency: International case studies on successful barrier removal , 2011 .

[5]  Martijn G. Rietbergen,et al.  Setting SMART targets for industrial energy use and industrial energy efficiency. , 2010 .

[6]  Nahid Golafshani,et al.  Understanding Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research , 2003 .

[7]  高桥广考,et al.  Energy management systems and energy management , 2011 .

[8]  Edelgard Gruber,et al.  Promoting energy conservation in small and medium-sized companies , 1991 .

[9]  Cédric Philibert,et al.  Considering the options: climate targets for all countries , 2001 .

[10]  H. Groenenberg,et al.  Benchmark-based emission allocation in a cap-and-trade system , 2002 .

[11]  N. Höhne What Is Next after the Kyoto Protocol?: Assessment of Options for International Climate Policy Post 2012 , 2008 .

[12]  Michael Lisowski The emperor's new clothes: redressing the Kyoto Protocol , 2002 .

[13]  Michael Grubb,et al.  The Costs of Limiting Fossil-Fuel CO2 Emissions: A Survey and Analysis , 1993 .

[14]  Iñaki Heras-Saizarbitoria,et al.  Shedding Light on ISO 14001 Certification Audits , 2013 .

[15]  T. Busch,et al.  Carbon management as a strategic challenge for SMEs , 2012 .

[16]  H. Nash The European Commission's sustainable consumption and production and sustainable industrial policy action plan , 2009 .

[17]  Ari Nissinen,et al.  Environmental criteria in the public purchases above the EU threshold values by three Nordic countries: 2003 and 2005 , 2009 .

[18]  P. Nijkamp,et al.  Energy Saving by Firms, Decision-Making, Barriers and Policies , 2001 .

[19]  Ralf Martin,et al.  Anatomy of a Paradox: Management Practices, Organizational Structure and Energy Efficiency , 2012 .

[20]  Jiang Yun,et al.  The challenge of reducing energy consumption of the Top-1000 largest industrial enterprises in China , 2010 .

[21]  Peter Bonsall,et al.  Performance Targets in Transport Policy , 2006 .

[22]  Mehmet Ali Ilgin,et al.  Environmentally conscious manufacturing and product recovery (ECMPRO): A review of the state of the art. , 2010, Journal of environmental management.

[23]  Gyöngyi Kovács,et al.  Corporate environmental responsibility in the supply chain , 2008 .

[24]  Martijn G. Rietbergen,et al.  The Effectiveness of Policy Instruments for Energy-Efficiency Improvement in Firms: The Dutch Experience , 2004 .

[25]  Charles D. Kolstad,et al.  The simple analytics of greenhouse gas emission intensity reduction targets , 2005 .

[26]  Stefan Schaltegger,et al.  Carbon accounting for sustainability and management. Status quo and challenges , 2012 .

[27]  Philip E. T. Lewis,et al.  Research Methods for Business Students , 2006 .

[28]  Thomas Zobel,et al.  Characterisation of environmental policy implementation in an EMS context : a multiple-case study in Sweden , 2008 .

[29]  A. Gouldson,et al.  Long-term corporate climate change targets: What could they deliver? , 2013 .

[30]  Chukwumerije Okereke,et al.  An Exploration of Motivations, Drivers and Barriers to Carbon Management:: The UK FTSE 100 , 2007 .

[31]  Lynn Price,et al.  Voluntary Agreements for Energy Efficiency or GHG Emissions Reduction in Industry: An Assessment of Programs Around the World , 2005 .

[32]  Ki‐Hoon Lee Carbon accounting for supply chain management in the automobile industry , 2012 .

[33]  Ernst Worrell,et al.  Designing Energy Conservation Voluntary Agreements for the Industrial Sector in China: Experience from a Pilot Project with Two Steel Mills in Shandong Province , 2005 .

[34]  Martijn G. Rietbergen,et al.  Assessing the potential impact of the CO2 performance ladder on the reduction of carbon dioxide emissions in the Netherlands , 2013 .

[35]  Raffaele Rotunno,et al.  Energy Management Maturity Model: an organizational tool to foster the continuous reduction of energy consumption in companies , 2014 .

[36]  Mark C. Paulk,et al.  Capability Maturity Model for Software, Version 1.1 , 1993 .

[37]  G. Keijzers,et al.  The evolution of Dutch environmental policy: The changing ecological arena from 1970–2000 and beyond , 2000 .

[38]  Martin K. Patel,et al.  Voluntary agreements with white certificates for energy efficiency improvement as a hybrid policy instrument , 2009 .

[39]  S. Ramesohl,et al.  Voluntary agreements on energy efficiency in industry — not a golden key, but another contribution to improve climate policy mixes , 2002 .

[40]  Antero Honkasalo,et al.  The EMAS scheme: a management tool and instrument of environmental policy , 1998 .

[41]  Ottar Michelsen,et al.  Green procurement in Norway; a survey of practices at the municipal and county level. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[42]  Martijn G. Rietbergen,et al.  Do agreements enhance energy efficiency improvement , 2002 .

[43]  Dagmara Nawrocka,et al.  Finding the connection: environmental management systems and environmental performance , 2009 .

[44]  Martijn G. Rietbergen,et al.  The target-setting process in the CO2 Performance Ladder: does it lead to ambitious goals for carbon dioxide emission reduction? , 2015 .

[45]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  The UN's 'Sustainable Energy for All' initiative is compatible with a warming limit of 2 °C , 2013 .

[46]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Environmental management system certification and its influence on corporate practices , 2008 .

[47]  Kornelis Blok,et al.  Industrial long-term agreements on energy efficiency in The Netherlands. A critical assessment of the monitoring methodologies and quantitative results , 2002 .

[48]  Jacob Hörisch Combating climate change through organisational innovation: an empirical analysis of internal emission trading schemes , 2013 .

[49]  O. Boiral,et al.  ISO 9001 and ISO 14001: Towards a Research Agenda on Management System Standards , 2013 .

[50]  A. Mckane,et al.  Thinking Globally: How ISO 50001 - Energy Management Can Make Industrial Energy Efficiency Standard Practice , 2010 .

[51]  Kornelis Blok,et al.  Aligning corporate greenhouse-gas emissions targets with climate goals , 2015 .

[52]  T. Lindhqvist,et al.  ISO 14001 in environmental supply chain practices , 2009 .

[53]  A. Kolk,et al.  Market Strategies for Climate Change , 2004 .

[54]  Jørgen Randers,et al.  Greenhouse gas emissions per unit of value added (“GEVA”) — A corporate guide to voluntary climate action , 2012 .

[55]  Martin Kumar Patel,et al.  An ex-ante evaluation of a White Certificates scheme in The Netherlands: A case study for the household sector , 2007 .

[56]  Jerald G. Fishman Energy management. , 1982, Hospital development.