Perishock Pause: An Independent Predictor of Survival From Out-of-Hospital Shockable Cardiac Arrest

Background— Perishock pauses are pauses in chest compressions before and after defibrillatory shock. We examined the relationship between perishock pauses and survival to hospital discharge. Methods and Results— We included out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients in the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Epistry–Cardiac Arrest who suffered arrest between December 2005 and June 2007, presented with a shockable rhythm (ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia), and had cardiopulmonary resuscitation process data for at least 1 shock (n=815). We used multivariable logistic regression to determine the association between survival and perishock pauses. In an analysis adjusted for Utstein predictors of survival, the odds of survival were significantly lower for patients with preshock pause ≥20 seconds (odds ratio, 0.47; 95% confidence interval, 0.27 to 0.82) and perishock pause ≥40 seconds (odds ratio, 0.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.31 to 0.97) compared with patients with preshock pause <10 seconds and perishock pause <20 seconds. Postshock pause was not independently associated with a significant change in the odds of survival. Log-linear modeling depicted a decrease in survival to hospital discharge of 18% and 14% for every 5-second increase in both preshock and perishock pause interval (up to 40 and 50 seconds, respectively), with no significant association noted with changes in the postshock pause interval. Conclusions— In patients with cardiac arrest presenting in a shockable rhythm, longer perishock and preshock pauses were independently associated with a decrease in survival to hospital discharge. The impact of preshock pause on survival suggests that refinement of automatic defibrillator software and paramedic education to minimize preshock pause delays may have a significant impact on survival.

[1]  Vinay M Nadkarni,et al.  Part 14: Pediatric Advanced Life Support , 2010 .

[2]  Bentley J Bobrow,et al.  Part 4: CPR overview: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. , 2010, Circulation.

[3]  B. Abella,et al.  Safety and efficacy of defibrillator charging during ongoing chest compressions: a multi-center study. , 2010, Resuscitation.

[4]  D. Davis,et al.  Minimizing pre- and post-defibrillation pauses increases the likelihood of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). , 2010, Resuscitation.

[5]  R. Migliani,et al.  DEFI 2005: A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Effect of Automated External Defibrillator Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Protocol on Outcome From Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest , 2010, Circulation.

[6]  E. Christensen,et al.  Increase in pre-shock pause caused by drug administration before defibrillation: an observational, full-scale simulation study. , 2010, Resuscitation.

[7]  R. Koster,et al.  Chest Compressions Cause Recurrence of Ventricular Fibrillation After the First Successful Conversion by Defibrillation in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest , 2010, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[8]  Henry E. Wang,et al.  Interruptions in cardiopulmonary resuscitation from paramedic endotracheal intubation. , 2009, Annals of emergency medicine.

[9]  Judy Powell,et al.  Chest Compression Fraction Determines Survival in Patients With Out-of-Hospital Ventricular Fibrillation , 2009, Circulation.

[10]  A. Kuzovlev,et al.  Effect of implementation of new resuscitation guidelines on quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and survival. , 2009, Resuscitation.

[11]  David D. Salcido,et al.  The Effect of the Preshock Pause on Coronary Perfusion Pressure Decay and Rescue Shock Outcome in Porcine Ventricular Fibrillation , 2009, Prehospital emergency care : official journal of the National Association of EMS Physicians and the National Association of State EMS Directors.

[12]  C. Callaway,et al.  Regional variation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest incidence and outcome. , 2008, JAMA.

[13]  Graham Nichol,et al.  Rationale, development and implementation of the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Epistry-Cardiac Arrest. , 2008, Resuscitation.

[14]  Gavin D Perkins,et al.  Quality of CPR during advanced resuscitation training. , 2008, Resuscitation.

[15]  B. Abella,et al.  Uniform reporting of measured quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). , 2007, Resuscitation.

[16]  B. Abella,et al.  Pauses in chest compression and inappropriate shocks: a comparison of manual and semi-automatic defibrillation attempts. , 2007, Resuscitation.

[17]  K. Sunde,et al.  Comparison of hands-off time during CPR with manual and semi-automatic defibrillation in a manikin model. , 2007, Resuscitation.

[18]  D. Davis,et al.  A Descriptive Analysis of Emergency Medical Service Systems Participating in the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) Network , 2007, Prehospital emergency care : official journal of the National Association of EMS Physicians and the National Association of State EMS Directors.

[19]  Jo Kramer-Johansen,et al.  Quality of out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation with real time automated feedback: a prospective interventional study. , 2006, Resuscitation.

[20]  Jo Kramer-Johansen,et al.  Effects of compression depth and pre-shock pauses predict defibrillation failure during cardiac arrest. , 2006, Resuscitation.

[21]  R. Walker,et al.  Abstract 49: Defibrillation Success is not Meaningfully Associated with Duration of the Pre-shock Pause in Chest Compressions , 2006 .

[22]  David E. Snyder,et al.  One-Shock Versus Three-Shock Defibrillation Protocol Significantly Improves Outcome in a Porcine Model of Prolonged Ventricular Fibrillation Cardiac Arrest , 2006, Circulation.

[23]  P. Steen,et al.  Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. , 2005, JAMA.

[24]  B. Abella,et al.  Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during in-hospital cardiac arrest. , 2005, JAMA.

[25]  David E. Snyder,et al.  Wide variation in cardiopulmonary resuscitation interruption intervals among commercially available automated external defibrillators may affect survival despite high defibrillation efficacy , 2004, Critical care medicine.

[26]  R. Berg,et al.  Automated external defibrillation versus manual defibrillation for prolonged ventricular fibrillation: lethal delays of chest compressions before and after countershocks. , 2003, Annals of emergency medicine.

[27]  Wanchun Tang,et al.  Adverse Outcomes of Interrupted Precordial Compression During Automated Defibrillation , 2002, Circulation.

[28]  Robert A. Berg,et al.  Importance of Continuous Chest Compressions During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Improved Outcome During a Simulated Single Lay-Rescuer Scenario , 2002, Circulation.

[29]  Robert A. Berg,et al.  Adverse Hemodynamic Effects of Interrupting Chest Compressions for Rescue Breathing During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Ventricular Fibrillation Cardiac Arrest , 2001, Circulation.

[30]  D Kromhout,et al.  The burden of cardiovascular diseases mortality in Europe. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology on Cardiovascular Mortality and Morbidity Statistics in Europe. , 1997, European heart journal.

[31]  D Kromhout,et al.  Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology on Cardiovascular Mortality and Morbidity Statistics in Europe , 1997 .

[32]  J Barrett,et al.  Outcome of CPR in a large metropolitan area--where are the survivors? , 1991, Annals of emergency medicine.