Solubility of Root Canal Sealers: A Comparative Study

Introduction Root canal sealers used in odontological applications are capable of providing an apical seal, thus inhibiting potential bacterial penetration into the periradicular tissues. Since insolubility is the ideal characteristic for a root canal sealer material, in dentistry the sealability of the material depends on its solubility. Purpose This study tested the solubility of six different root canal sealers: two ZnOE-based sealers (Endomethasone C and Argoseal), two calcium hydroxide-containing sealers (Bioseal Normal and Acroseal), and two resin-based sealers (AH Plus and MM Seal). Methods Ten specimens of each material were prepared using stainless steel ring molds with the same internal diameter and the same height in order to obtain similar samples, and immersed in water. Solubility was determined by using sample weight loss (%) after 24 hours and after 2 months. The test was performed according to the International Standards Organization 6876 standard and the American Dental Association specifications No. 30 and No. 57. Data were statistically analyzed with a one-way analysis of variance test (ANOVA). Results The ANOVA test showed significant differences between the various groups. The post-hoc test showed that resin-based root canal sealers had significantly lower solubility percentages than other groups (p<0.05), and showed no difference between them (p>0.05). Conclusions All the materials fulfilled the requirements of International Standard 6876 and ANSI/ADA specifications demonstrating a weight loss of less than 3%. Under the conditions of the present study, all root canal sealers were of low solubility, but the lowest solubility percentages were recorded in resin-based root canal sealers, which can be considered virtually insoluble, and thanks to this physical property, ideal for use as endodontic sealer.

[1]  E. Saino,et al.  Adhesion of Streptococcus Mutans to Different Restorative Materials , 2009, The International journal of artificial organs.

[2]  C. Poggio,et al.  Solubility of root-end-filling materials: a comparative study. , 2007, Journal of endodontics.

[3]  F. Tay,et al.  The effect of immediate versus delayed cementation on the retention of different types of fiber post in canals obturated using a eugenol sealer. , 2006, Journal of endodontics.

[4]  M. Sousa-Neto,et al.  A comparative study of physicochemical properties of AH PlusTM and EpiphanyTM root canal sealants , 2006 .

[5]  K. Becker,et al.  Emerging Staphylococcus Species as New Pathogens in Implant Infections , 2006, The International journal of artificial organs.

[6]  C. R. Arciola,et al.  Implant Infection and Infection Resistant Materials: A Mini Review , 2005, The International journal of artificial organs.

[7]  C. R. Arciola,et al.  Etiology of Implant Orthopedic Infections: A Survey on 1027 Clinical Isolates , 2005, The International journal of artificial organs.

[8]  M. Fridland,et al.  MTA solubility: a long term study. , 2005, Journal of endodontics.

[9]  L. Breschi,et al.  Evaluation of bacterial adhesion of Streptococcus mutans on dental restorative materials. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[10]  M. Fridland,et al.  Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) solubility and porosity with different water-to-powder ratios. , 2003, Journal of endodontics.

[11]  E Schäfer,et al.  Solubility of root-canal sealers in water and artificial saliva. , 2003, International endodontic journal.

[12]  K. Gulabivala,et al.  A comparative study of selected physical properties of five root-canal sealers. , 2003, International endodontic journal.

[13]  Samuel I Kratchman,et al.  Obturation of the root canal system. , 2003, Dentistry today.

[14]  D. Ørstavik,et al.  Dimensional change following setting of root canal sealer materials. , 2001, Dental Materials.

[15]  M. A. Schaeffer,et al.  Setting times for endodontic sealers under clinical usage and in vitro conditions. , 2001, Journal of endodontics.

[16]  J. Aqrabawi Endodontics: Sealing ability of amalgam, super EBA cement, and MTA when used as retrograde filling materials , 2000, British Dental Journal.

[17]  J. Aqrabawi Sealing ability of amalgam, super EBA cement, and MTA when used as retrograde filling materials. , 2000 .

[18]  J. D. PÉcora,et al.  Effect of different grades of gum rosins and hydrogenated resins on the solubility, disintegration, and dimensional alterations of Grossman cement. , 1999, Journal of endodontics.

[19]  A. M. Kielbassa,et al.  DAS WASSERAUFNAHMEVERHALTEN VERSCHIEDENER WURZELKANALSEALER , 1998 .

[20]  L. Tronstad,et al.  Solubility and biocompatibility of calcium hydroxide-containing root canal sealers. , 1988, Endodontics & dental traumatology.

[21]  K. Kerekes,et al.  Clinical performance of three endodontic sealers. , 1987, Endodontics & dental traumatology.

[22]  D. Ørstavik,et al.  Weight loss of endodontic sealers, cements and pastes in water. , 1983, Scandinavian journal of dental research.

[23]  D. Orstavik Weight loss of endodontic sealers, cements and pastes in water. , 1983, Scandinavian journal of dental research.

[24]  L. Grossman Solubility of Root Canal Cements , 1978, Journal of dental research.

[25]  D. McComb,et al.  Comparison of physical properties of polycarboxylate-based and conventional root canal sealers. , 1976, Journal of endodontics.

[26]  Stephen Cohen,et al.  Pathways of the Pulp , 1976 .

[27]  T. Higginbotham A comparative study of the physical properties of five commonly used root canal sealers , 1967 .