Do Children Require More High-Frequency Audibility than Adults with Similar Hearing Losses ?

Speech cannot be understood if it cannot be heard. Therefore, audibility is undoubtedly a major goal of amplification for children and adults with hearing loss. In restoring audibility, it is often assumed that the listener can extract speech cues over the entire range of speech frequencies. This assumption is true for a person with mild to moderate hearing losses, but is not true when hearing loss is severe at the high frequencies. In addressing whether severely hearing-impaired children require more high-frequency audibility than adults with similar hearing losses, we will firstly examine how audibility affects judgments of speech intelligibility and measured speech intelligibility for severely hearingimpaired adults and children. Secondly, we will attempt to identify the factors that affect the usefulness of audibility for speech intelligibility. Finally, we will discuss the implications of the relationship between audibility and speech intelligibility for prescribing gain-frequency response for adults and children.

[1]  D D Dirks,et al.  Stop-consonant recognition for normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. II: Articulation index predictions. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  D D Dirks,et al.  Articulation index predictions of contextually dependent words. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  M. T. Ochs Revising the routine audiologic test battery to examine sources of interpatient variability. , 1990, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[4]  A F Snik,et al.  Hearing-aid fitting in profoundly hearing-impaired children. Comparison of prescription rules. , 1995, Scandinavian audiology.

[5]  A Boothroyd,et al.  Age-related changes on a children's test of sensory-level speech perception capacity. , 1998, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[6]  D Byrne Paired comparison procedures in hearing aid evaluations. , 1994, Ear and hearing.

[7]  P. Stelmachowicz,et al.  Perception of voiceless fricatives by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children and adults. , 2000, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[8]  D Byrne,et al.  Speech recognition of hearing-impaired listeners: predictions from audibility and the limited role of high-frequency amplification. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  G A Studebaker The effect of equating loudness on audibility-based hearing aid selection procedures. , 1992, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[10]  D Byrne,et al.  Evaluation of the National Acoustic Laboratories' new hearing aid selection procedure. , 1988, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[11]  B. Moore Perceptual Consequences of Cochlear Damage , 1995 .

[12]  D Byrne,et al.  Maximizing Effective Audibility in Hearing Aid Fitting , 2001, Ear and hearing.

[13]  R C Seewald,et al.  Selecting Amplification Characteristics for Young Hearing‐Impaired Children , 1985, Ear and hearing.

[14]  H. Dillon,et al.  The National Acoustic Laboratories' (NAL) New Procedure for Selecting the Gain and Frequency Response of a Hearing Aid , 1986, Ear and hearing.

[15]  Harvey Fletcher A SPACE‐TIME PATTERN THEORY OF HEARING , 1930 .

[16]  C V Pavlovic,et al.  An articulation index based procedure for predicting the speech recognition performance of hearing-impaired individuals. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  C. Turner,et al.  High-frequency audibility: benefits for hearing-impaired listeners. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  B. Moore Dead Regions in the Cochlea: Diagnosis, Perceptual Consequences, and Implications for the Fitting of Hearing Aids , 2001, Trends in amplification.

[19]  R J Nozza,et al.  Infant speech-sound discrimination in noise. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  B. Moore,et al.  A revised model of loudness perception applied to cochlear hearing loss , 2004, Hearing Research.

[21]  Dianne J. Van Tasell,et al.  Hearing Loss, Speech, and Hearing Aids , 1993 .

[22]  R. Nozza Thresholds Are Not Enough : Understanding How Infants Process Speech Has a Role in How We Manage Hearing Loss , 2002 .

[23]  Harvey Dillon,et al.  NAL-NL1: A new procedure for fitting non-linear hearing aids , 1999 .

[24]  P. Newall,et al.  Hearing aid gain and frequency response requirements for the severely/profoundly hearing impaired. , 1990, Ear and hearing.

[25]  P G Stelmachowicz,et al.  Bandwidth effects on children's perception of the inflectional morpheme /s/: acoustical measurements, auditory detection, and clarity rating. , 2000, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[26]  R C Seewald,et al.  The input/output formula: a theoretical approach to the fitting of personal amplification devices. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  H. Dillon,et al.  An international comparison of long‐term average speech spectra , 1994 .

[28]  G A Studebaker,et al.  Age-related changes in monosyllabic word recognition performance when audibility is held constant. , 1997, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[29]  P G Stelmachowicz,et al.  The relation between stimulus context, speech audibility, and perception for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children. , 2000, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[30]  Harvey Dillon,et al.  Prediction of Speech Recognition From Audibility and Psychoacoustic Abilities of Hearing-Impaired Listeners , 2019, Modeling Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

[31]  C V Pavlovic,et al.  Derivation of primary parameters and procedures for use in speech intelligibility predictions. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  R J Nozza,et al.  Infant-adult differences in unmasked thresholds for the discrimination of consonant-vowel syllable pairs. , 1991, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[33]  J. Macrae,et al.  Permanent threshold shift associated with overamplification by hearing aids. , 1991, Journal of speech and hearing research.