Random vibration testing with kurtosis control by IFFT phase manipulation

Abstract Non-Gaussian random shaker testing with kurtosis control is introduced in the paper as a way of increasing or decreasing the excitation crest factor (CF). The CF increase is required for more accurate simulation of ground vehicle vibrations and the CF decrease is useful in other applications such as modal testing. Using kurtosis as a measure of CF behavior leads to closed-form solution for making the IFFT generation non-Gaussian by special phase manipulation. A universal phase selection procedure capable of modeling random excitations with a high or low kurtosis has been developed. Because of the analytical solution advantage, the proposed phase method meets time restrictions critical for shaker controller operation. Low CF values achieved by the suggested analytical kurtosis-based solution are close enough to those obtained by the known method of sequential moment minimization, which considers moments of higher order but by numerical optimization only. In the case of CF increase, the developed phase manipulation algorithm randomizes high peaks in terms of their amplitude, position, and the number of severe peaks per data block. This ensures realistic variability of high peak behavior distinct from having just one high peak of narrow height variation in all data blocks as in another known approach of on-band phase limiting that is also a numerical technique, not an analytical solution as the proposed method.

[1]  Rik Pintelon,et al.  System Identification: A Frequency Domain Approach , 2012 .

[2]  Alexander Steinwolf Random vibration testing beyond PSD limitations , 2006 .

[3]  Alexander Steinwolf,et al.  Approximation and simulation of probability distributions with a variable kurtosis value , 1996 .

[4]  S. Boyd Multitone signals with low crest factor , 1986 .

[5]  Alexander Steinwolf,et al.  Shaker random testing with low kurtosis: Review of the methods and application for sigma limiting , 2010 .

[6]  Gary Cloud Back to Basics. Optical Methods in Experimental Mechanics. Part 18: Geometric Moire Phenomena and Simulations , 2005 .

[7]  Robert B. Randall,et al.  Rolling element bearing diagnostics—A tutorial , 2011 .

[8]  R P Hamernik,et al.  A generalized approach to random noise synthesis: theory and computer simulation. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  H. Saunders,et al.  Mechanical Signature Analysis—Theory and Applications , 1988 .

[10]  D. Smallwood Generating Non-Gaussian Vibration for Testing Purposes , 2005 .

[11]  William H. Press,et al.  Book-Review - Numerical Recipes in Pascal - the Art of Scientific Computing , 1989 .

[12]  J. Schoukens,et al.  Peak factor minimization of input and output signals of linear systems , 1988 .

[13]  John E. Mottershead,et al.  Finite Element Model Updating in Structural Dynamics , 1995 .

[14]  J. Schoukens,et al.  Crest-factor minimization using nonlinear Chebyshev approximation methods , 1991 .

[15]  David J. Ewins,et al.  Modal Testing: Theory, Practice, And Application , 2000 .

[16]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes in C. The art of scientific computing , 1987 .

[17]  Manfred R. Schroeder,et al.  Synthesis of low-peak-factor signals and binary sequences with low autocorrelation (Corresp.) , 1970, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.