‘Egg-box’ panel for commercial vehicle front – compressive loading tests

The numbers of serious accidents and fatalities from accidents between commercial vehicles and vulnerable road users (VRUs) are still high and show no sign of declining. For pedestrians, this is traumatic due to high incompatibility of vehicle fronts. Hence, decisions have been made to implement countermeasures that have the potential for casualty reduction. This paper proposes an ‘egg-box’ energy-absorbing panel to be incorporated in a commercial vehicle's cab front and sides. As a consequence it is expected to reduce the load between vehicle and pedestrians, while at the same time eliminating the risk of serious injuries and fatalities. The egg-box panel herein has been compressed under quasi-static conditions in order to study the collapse mechanism of the structure and quantify the corresponding load regimes for various stages of collapse. An attempt has been made to understand the structure's energy-absorption capability from the resulting load-deflection curves. Also, a simple assessment of the structure's crashworthiness is discussed and comparison made to existing energy absorbers. The maximum load that a 30 mm high panel structure can withstand is approximately 18 kN. Unlike in a concertina tube where a sudden drop in load is observed after the formation of the first plastic hinge, there is no drastic fall in this load after the collapse has started. A steady load is observed with the progressing deformation. With the height reduced to 20 mm, the maximum load capacity increases by 20% approximately along with increase in the stiffness.

[1]  H E Postlethwaite,et al.  Use of collapsible structural elements as impact isolators, with special references to automotive applications , 1970 .

[2]  E. C. Chirwa,et al.  Theoretical analysis of tapered thin-walled metal inverbucktube , 1993 .

[3]  Abdulmalik A. Alghamdi,et al.  Collapsible impact energy absorbers: an overview , 2001 .

[4]  Husain Abbas,et al.  Considerations in straight fold analysis of thin tubes under axial compression , 2005 .

[5]  R. Velmurugan,et al.  Experimental and numerical investigations into collapse behaviour of thin spherical shells under drop hammer impact , 2007 .

[6]  P D Soden,et al.  Inextensional collapse of thin-walled tubes under axial compression , 1977 .

[7]  Norman A. Fleck,et al.  The plastic collapse and energy absorption capacity of egg-box panels , 2003 .

[8]  Athanasios G. Mamalis,et al.  Crashworthiness of vehicles: An introduction to aspects of collision of motor cars, ships, aircraft and railway coaches , 1978 .

[9]  S. Reid.  PLASTIC DEFORMATION MECHANISMS IN AXIALLY COMPRESSED METAL TUBES USED AS IMPACT ENERGY ABSORBERS , 1993 .

[10]  Vikram Deshpande,et al.  Energy absorption of an egg-box material , 2003 .

[11]  W. Abramowicz,et al.  Axial crushing of foam-filled columns , 1988 .

[12]  Venkatesh,et al.  Experimental and numerical studies of dynamic axial compression of thin walled spherical shells , 2004 .

[13]  S. L. Rice,et al.  Impact strength of materials , 1972 .

[14]  Sravanthi Nowpada,et al.  Benchmarking and accident characteristics of flat-fronted commercial vehicles with respect to pedestrian safety , 2007 .

[15]  Athanasios G. Mamalis,et al.  Extensible plastic collapse of thin-wall frusta as energy absorbers , 1986 .

[17]  Mpf Sutcliffe,et al.  Deformation and energy absorption of composite egg-box panels , 2007 .

[18]  N. Gupta,et al.  Collapse mode transitions of thin tubes with wall thickness, end condition and shape eccentricity , 2006 .

[19]  J. M. Alexander.  AN APPROXIMATE ANALYSIS OF THE COLLAPSE OF THIN CYLINDRICAL SHELLS UNDER AXIAL LOADING , 1960 .

[20]  Husain Abbas,et al.  Axisymmetric axial crushing of thin frusta , 2000 .

[21]  Tomasz Wierzbicki,et al.  Crash behavior of box columns filled with aluminum honeycomb or foam , 1998 .

[22]  Dušan Kecman.  Bending collapse of rectangular section tubes in relation to the bus roll over problem , 1979 .