Multiuser Interaction with Hybrid VR and AR for Cultural Heritage Objects

This research investigates the factors and ways in which users initiate conversations and engage in interactions in a hybrid virtual environment using a combination of Virtual Reality (VR) and Augmented Reality (AR) devices. The research was done in the ‘spirit of the ancient Silk Road’ where trade brought in exchange of ideas, cultural influence and cross-border communications. The notion of a 21st century Silk Road is necessarily digital, over the Internet and based around 3D cultural heritage objects. Digi-Capital’s Report forecasts the revenue of AR and VR to be US$150b by 2020. We projected that VR and AR will become pervasive, much like the Social Web and the universal ubiquity of mobile devices such as smartphones and wearables. Here, we conducted a user study exploring users’ acceptance of the use of hybrid VR and AR for cultural heritage, and investigated the social nature of multiple co-located user interaction. We adapted the UTAUT questionnaire in our experiment and found that social influence has positive effects on performance expectancy and effort expectancy, which generate positive effects on user behavioural intention. This study pioneers the future design and use of hybrid VR and AR technology in cultural heritage specifically, and in other application areas generally by highlighting the significant role that social influence plays in enhancing users’ behavioural intention facilitated by different immersive devices.

[1]  Fred D. Davis A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems : theory and results , 1985 .

[2]  Theodoros N. Arvanitis,et al.  The Shotton River and Mesolithic Dwellings: Recreating the Past from Geo-Seismic Data Sources , 2004, VAST.

[3]  Julian Frommel,et al.  ShareVR: Enabling Co-Located Experiences for Virtual Reality between HMD and Non-HMD Users , 2017, CHI.

[4]  Lennart E. Nacke,et al.  From game design elements to gamefulness: defining "gamification" , 2011, MindTrek.

[5]  Massimo Bergamasco,et al.  Beyond virtual museums: experiencing immersive virtual reality in real museums , 2010 .

[6]  Maria Roussou,et al.  The Museum as Digital Storyteller: Collaborative Participatory Creation of Interactive Digital Experiences , 2015 .

[7]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  User acceptance of information technology : a unified view , 1998 .

[8]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Where the action is , 2001 .

[9]  Anthony C. Davison,et al.  Bootstrap Methods and Their Application , 1998 .

[10]  Simon See,et al.  “ InThe-Wild ” Observation and Evaluation of a Chinese Heritage VR Environment with HTC VIVE , 2022 .

[11]  Eugene Ch'ng,et al.  Time and a Place: A luni-solar 'time-reckoner' from 8th millennium BC Scotland , 2013 .

[12]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed. , 2009 .

[13]  Paul Tennent,et al.  Appropriate Control Methods for Mobile Virtual Exhibitions , 2018, VRTCH.

[14]  Eugene Ch'ng,et al.  Experiential archaeology: Is virtual time travel possible? , 2009 .

[15]  Akrivi Katifori,et al.  Cultivating Mobile-Mediated Social Interaction in the Museum: Towards Group-Based Digital Storytelling Experiences , 2016 .

[16]  Massimo Zancanaro,et al.  Fostering conversation after the museum visit: a WOZ study for a shared interface , 2008, AVI '08.

[17]  Ivan E. Sutherland,et al.  The Ultimate Display , 1965 .

[18]  J. Bruce Overmier,et al.  Choice behavior under differential outcomes: Sample stimulus control versus expectancy control , 2015 .

[19]  C. Fornell A Second generation of multivariate analysis : classification of methods and implications for marketing research , 1985 .

[20]  Eugene Ch'ng New Ways of Accessing Information Spaces Using 3D Multitouch Tables , 2012, 2012 International Conference on Cyberworlds.

[21]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  Understanding experience in interactive systems , 2004, DIS '04.