Evolution of digital organisms at high mutation rates leads to survival of the flattest

Darwinian evolution favours genotypes with high replication rates, a process called ‘survival of the fittest’. However, knowing the replication rate of each individual genotype may not suffice to predict the eventual survivor, even in an asexual population. According to quasi-species theory, selection favours the cloud of genotypes, interconnected by mutation, whose average replication rate is highest. Here we confirm this prediction using digital organisms that self-replicate, mutate and evolve. Forty pairs of populations were derived from 40 different ancestors in identical selective environments, except that one of each pair experienced a 4-fold higher mutation rate. In 12 cases, the dominant genotype that evolved at the lower mutation rate achieved a replication rate >1.5-fold faster than its counterpart. We allowed each of these disparate pairs to compete across a range of mutation rates. In each case, as mutation rate was increased, the outcome of competition switched to favour the genotype with the lower replication rate. These genotypes, although they occupied lower fitness peaks, were located in flatter regions of the fitness surface and were therefore more robust with respect to mutations.

[1]  J. B. S. Haldane,et al.  The Effect of Variation of Fitness , 1937, The American Naturalist.

[2]  H. Muller,et al.  Our load of mutations. , 1950, American journal of human genetics.

[3]  C. H. WADDINGTON,et al.  Canalization of Development and Genetic Assimilation of Acquired Characters , 1959, Nature.

[4]  M. Eigen,et al.  The Hypercycle: A principle of natural self-organization , 2009 .

[5]  M. Eigen,et al.  Molecular quasi-species. , 1988 .

[6]  P. Schuster,et al.  Stationary mutant distributions and evolutionary optimization. , 1988, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[7]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  Unravelling the Evolutionary Advantage of Sex : a Commentary on ' Mutation–selection Balance and the Evolutionary Advantage of Sex and Recombination ' , 2022 .

[8]  Charles E. Taylor,et al.  Artificial Life II , 1991 .

[9]  M A Nowak,et al.  What is a quasispecies? , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[10]  J. Drake Rates of spontaneous mutation among RNA viruses. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  G. Wagner,et al.  A POPULATION GENETIC THEORY OF CANALIZATION , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[12]  R. Lenski,et al.  Evolution of high mutation rates in experimental populations of E. coli , 1997, Nature.

[13]  Martin A. Nowak,et al.  Evolution of genetic redundancy , 1997, Nature.

[14]  F. Taddei,et al.  Role of mutator alleles in adaptive evolution , 1997, Nature.

[15]  C. Adami,et al.  Introduction To Artificial Life , 1997, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[16]  S. J. Freeland,et al.  Load minimization of the genetic code: history does not explain the pattern , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  J. Drake,et al.  Rates of spontaneous mutation. , 1998, Genetics.

[18]  R. Lenski,et al.  Diminishing returns from mutation supply rate in asexual populations. , 1999, Science.

[19]  M. Huynen,et al.  Neutral evolution of mutational robustness. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  M. Lynch,et al.  PERSPECTIVE: SPONTANEOUS DELETERIOUS MUTATION , 1999, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[21]  Peter D. Keightley,et al.  High genomic deleterious mutation rates in hominids , 1999, Nature.

[22]  T. Johnson The approach to mutation–selection balance in an infinite asexual population, and the evolution of mutation rates , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  C. Ofria,et al.  Genome complexity, robustness and genetic interactions in digital organisms , 1999, Nature.

[24]  C. Adami,et al.  Evolution of Biological Complexity , 2000, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[25]  L. Chao,et al.  Evolvability of an RNA virus is determined by its mutational neighbourhood , 2000, Nature.

[26]  Claus O. Wilke,et al.  Adaptive evolution on neutral networks , 2001, Bulletin of mathematical biology.