Performance analysis of frequency restoration for parallel voltage source inverters connected with a realistic communication channel

A topic of interest within the microgrid (MG) community is to achieve accurate sharing of active and reactive power among voltage source inverters (VSI) working in parallel while keeping the voltage frequency and amplitude stable, and close to a given reference. This problem has been mainly solved by the so-called frequency and voltage droop controllers that are local control loops implemented in each VSI. However, since they introduce a frequency and amplitude deviation, a secondary integral-like control loop using a communication system is usually deployed to enable each VSI to cancel the deviations. This paper evaluates two secondary control implementations of the frequency restoration with respect to properties of the communication system. Networked control applications are subject to known problems that are inherent to the use of a communication system such as message losses or varying sampling/transmission intervals, to name a few. The performance analysis reveals that control policies should be designed accounting also for the properties of the communication system. Otherwise, unexpected results violating the control specifications may appear.

[1]  J.-d. Decotignie The Many Faces of Industrial Ethernet [Past and Present] , 2009, IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine.

[2]  Wei Liu,et al.  Decentralized Multi-Agent System-Based Cooperative Frequency Control for Autonomous Microgrids With Communication Constraints , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[3]  Hong Ye,et al.  Scheduling of networked control systems , 2001 .

[4]  Francesco Bullo,et al.  Plug-and-play control and optimization in microgrids , 2014, 53rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[5]  Frank L. Lewis,et al.  Distributed Adaptive Voltage Control of Inverter-Based Microgrids , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[6]  Ioan Serban Frequency restoration in microgrids by means of distributed control with minimum communication requirements , 2014, 2014 IEEE 23rd International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE).

[7]  Nathan van de Wouw,et al.  Networked Control Systems With Communication Constraints: Tradeoffs Between Transmission Intervals, Delays and Performance , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[8]  Oriol Gomis-Bellmunt,et al.  Trends in Microgrid Control , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[9]  James Moyne,et al.  Performance evaluation of control networks: Ethernet, ControlNet, and DeviceNet , 2001 .

[10]  Huijun Gao,et al.  Network-Induced Constraints in Networked Control Systems—A Survey , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[11]  Alvaro Luna,et al.  A generalized voltage droop strategy for control of multi-terminal DC grids , 2013 .

[12]  João Pedro Hespanha,et al.  A Survey of Recent Results in Networked Control Systems , 2007, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[13]  R. Adapa,et al.  Control of parallel connected inverters in stand-alone AC supply systems , 1991, Conference Record of the 1991 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting.

[14]  Juan C. Vasquez,et al.  Distributed Secondary Control for Islanded Microgrids—A Novel Approach , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[15]  Juan C. Vasquez,et al.  Hierarchical Control of Droop-Controlled AC and DC Microgrids—A General Approach Toward Standardization , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[16]  Jean-Dominique Decotignie The Many Faces of Industrial Ethernet , 2009 .

[17]  Karl-Erik Årzén,et al.  TrueTime: Simulation of Networked and Embedded Control Systems , 2010 .