Treatment decisions based on scalar and functional baseline covariates

The amount and complexity of patient-level data being collected in randomized-controlled trials offer both opportunities and challenges for developing personalized rules for assigning treatment for a given disease or ailment. For example, trials examining treatments for major depressive disorder are not only collecting typical baseline data such as age, gender, or scores on various tests, but also data that measure the structure and function of the brain such as images from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), functional MRI (fMRI), or electroencephalography (EEG). These latter types of data have an inherent structure and may be considered as functional data. We propose an approach that uses baseline covariates, both scalars and functions, to aid in the selection of an optimal treatment. In addition to providing information on which treatment should be selected for a new patient, the estimated regime has the potential to provide insight into the relationship between treatment response and the set of baseline covariates. Our approach can be viewed as an extension of "advantage learning" to include both scalar and functional covariates. We describe our method and how to implement it using existing software. Empirical performance of our method is evaluated with simulated data in a variety of settings and also applied to data arising from a study of patients with major depressive disorder from whom baseline scalar covariates as well as functional data from EEG are available.

[1]  Susan A. Murphy,et al.  A-Learning for approximate planning , 2004 .

[2]  M. Kosorok,et al.  Reinforcement learning design for cancer clinical trials , 2009, Statistics in medicine.

[3]  James M. Robins,et al.  Optimal Structural Nested Models for Optimal Sequential Decisions , 2004 .

[4]  Wenbin Lu,et al.  Variable selection for optimal treatment decision , 2013, Statistical methods in medical research.

[5]  Daniel M. Alschuler,et al.  Current Source Density Measures of Electroencephalographic Alpha Predict Antidepressant Treatment Response , 2011, Biological Psychiatry.

[6]  Ciprian M Crainiceanu,et al.  Penalized Functional Regression , 2011, Journal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America.

[7]  H. Mayberg,et al.  Stuck in a rut: rethinking depression and its treatment , 2011, Trends in Neurosciences.

[8]  Bradley N Gaynes,et al.  What did STAR*D teach us? Results from a large-scale, practical, clinical trial for patients with depression. , 2009, Psychiatric services.

[9]  Ciprian M. Crainiceanu,et al.  Restricted Likelihood Ratio Tests for Functional Effects in the Functional Linear Model , 2014, Technometrics.

[10]  Anastasios A. Tsiatis,et al.  Q- and A-learning Methods for Estimating Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes , 2012, Statistical science : a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics.

[11]  Eric B. Laber,et al.  A Robust Method for Estimating Optimal Treatment Regimes , 2012, Biometrics.

[12]  Ian W McKeague,et al.  Estimation of treatment policies based on functional predictors. , 2014, Statistica Sinica.

[13]  A. Franco,et al.  Toward a neuroimaging treatment selection biomarker for major depressive disorder. , 2013, JAMA psychiatry.

[14]  Donald B. Rubin,et al.  Bayesian Inference for Causal Effects: The Role of Randomization , 1978 .

[15]  Donglin Zeng,et al.  Estimating Individualized Treatment Rules Using Outcome Weighted Learning , 2012, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[16]  S. Murphy,et al.  Optimal dynamic treatment regimes , 2003 .

[17]  Susan Murphy,et al.  Inference for non-regular parameters in optimal dynamic treatment regimes , 2010, Statistical methods in medical research.

[18]  S. Murphy,et al.  PERFORMANCE GUARANTEES FOR INDIVIDUALIZED TREATMENT RULES. , 2011, Annals of statistics.

[19]  Erica E M Moodie,et al.  Estimating Optimal Dynamic Regimes: Correcting Bias under the Null , 2009, Scandinavian journal of statistics, theory and applications.

[20]  Patrick J. McGrath,et al.  Electroencephalographic Alpha Measures Predict Therapeutic Response to a Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor Antidepressant: Pre- and Post-Treatment Findings , 2008, Biological Psychiatry.

[21]  Eric B. Laber,et al.  Dynamic treatment regimes: technical challenges and applications. , 2014, Electronic journal of statistics.

[22]  Gareth M. James,et al.  Functional Adaptive Model Estimation , 2005 .

[23]  Ciprian M. Crainiceanu,et al.  refund: Regression with Functional Data , 2013 .