Especial skills: specificity embedded within generality.

Recent evidence suggests that massive amounts of practice of the basketball free throw (a "set shot") results in the development of a specific memory representation that is unique to this one shot distance and angle, and that is distinct from set shots taken at locations other than the free throw line. We termed this unique capability an especial skill. In this article, we review the evidence and provide new data regarding the existence of especial skills. These findings are discussed in terms of their implications for motor control theory and in terms of the broader context of specificity versus generality in the learning of motor skills.

[1]  R. Schmidt.  Motor Schema Theory after 27 Years: Reflections and Implications for a New Theory , 2003, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[2]  R. Schmidt.  A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. , 1975 .

[3]  P. Fitts.  The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  M. HenryF.,et al.  Specificity vs.generality in learning motor skill , 1968 .

[5]  R G Marteniuk,et al.  Individual Differences in Motor Performance AND Learning , 1974, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[6]  Jeffery P. Simons,et al.  Challenges to Cognitive Bases for an Especial Motor Skill at the Regulation Baseball Pitching Distance , 2009, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[7]  R A Abrams,et al.  Speed and accuracy of saccadic eye movements: characteristics of impulse variability in the oculomotor system. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  J. Adams,et al.  A closed-loop theory of motor learning. , 1971, Journal of motor behavior.

[9]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis, 4th ed. , 2005 .

[10]  Richard A Schmidt,et al.  Especial skills: their emergence with massive amounts of practice. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  The Organization of Action Sequences: Evidence From a Relearning Task. , 1995, Journal of motor behavior.

[12]  S. A. Wallace,et al.  Knowledge of performance and the learning of a closed motor skill. , 1979, Research quarterly.

[13]  R. Magill,et al.  A note on schema and exemplar approaches to motor skill representation in memory. , 1992, Journal of motor behavior.

[14]  J. Adams.  Historical review and appraisal of research on the learning, retention, and transfer of human motor skills. , 1987 .

[15]  L. Proteau.  Chapter 4 On The Specificity of Learning and the Role of Visual Information for Movement Control , 1992 .

[16]  G. Parfitt,et al.  A catastrophe model of anxiety and performance. , 1991, British journal of psychology.

[17]  Merton Pa.  How we control the contraction of our muscles. , 1972 .

[18]  Charles H Shea,et al.  Sequence Learning: Response Structure and Effector Transfer , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[19]  Timothy D. Lee,et al.  Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis , 1982 .

[20]  H. Zelaznik,et al.  Motor-output variability: a theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. , 1979, Psychological review.

[21]  L Proteau,et al.  A Sensorimotor Basis for Motor Learning: Evidence Indicating Specificity of Practice , 1992, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[22]  J. Foley.  The co-ordination and regulation of movements , 1968 .

[23]  J. Shea,et al.  Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill. , 1979 .

[24]  Darryl Bruce,et al.  Lashley and the problem of serial order. , 1994 .

[25]  C. Shea,et al.  Cognition and Motor Skill Acquisition: Contextual Dependencies , 1994 .

[26]  M. Raibert.  Motor Control and Learning by the State Space Model , 1977 .