The use of gradient analysis studies in advancing our understanding of the ecology of urbanizing landscapes: current status and future directions

Over the past decade, the urban–rural gradient approach has been effectively used to study the ecology of cities and towns around the world. These studies have focused on understanding the distribution of plants and animals as well as ecosystem processes along gradients of urbanization that run from densely urbanized inner city to more rural exurban environments. We reviewed 300 papers investigating urbanization gradients that were published in peer-reviewed journals between 1990 and May 2007. Sixty-three percent of the papers investigated the distribution of organisms along urbanization gradients. Only five papers addressed the measures used to quantify the urbanization gradient itself. Within the papers addressing the distribution of organisms, 49% investigated the responses of birds to urbanization gradients, and <10% of the papers investigated more cryptic organisms. Most of these studies utilized a variety of broad measures of urbanization, but future advances in the field will require the development of some standardized broad measures to facilitate comparisons between cities. More specific measures of urbanization can be used to gain a mechanistic understanding of species and ecosystem responses to urbanization gradients. While the gradient approach has made a significant contribution to our understanding of the ecology of cities and towns, there is now a need to address our current knowledge gaps so that the field can reach its full potential. We present two examples of research questions that demonstrate how we can enhance our understanding of urbanization gradients, and the ecological knowledge that we can obtain from them.

[1]  H. Gleason The individualistic concept of the plant association , 1926 .

[2]  H. Gleason,et al.  The individualistic concept of the plant association , 1939 .

[3]  R. Whittaker,et al.  GRADIENT ANALYSIS OF VEGETATION* , 1967, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[4]  T. Allen,et al.  A hierarchical model for the complexity of plant communities , 1983 .

[5]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Patterns of Fish Spawning in Hudson River Tributaries: Response to an Urban Gradient? , 1990 .

[6]  S. Pickett,et al.  Ecosystem Structure and Function along Urban‐Rural Gradients: An Unexploited Opportunity for Ecology , 1990 .

[7]  O. L. Gilbert,et al.  The Ecology of Urban Habitats , 1989, Springer Netherlands.

[8]  M. Mcdonnell,et al.  Heavy metal accumulations in forest soils along an urban- rural gradient in Southeastern New York, USA , 1991 .

[9]  Steward T. A. Pickett,et al.  Humans as Components of Ecosystems , 1993, Springer New York.

[10]  S. Pickett,et al.  The Application of the Ecological Gradient Paradigm to the Study of Urban Effects , 1993 .

[11]  R. Pouyat,et al.  Environmental effects of forest soil-invertebrate and fungal densities in oak stands along an urban-rural land use gradient , 1994 .

[12]  R. Blair Land Use and Avian Species Diversity Along an Urban Gradient , 1996 .

[13]  M. Bowers,et al.  Foraging of Gray Squirrels on an Urban‐Rural Gradient: Use of the Gud to Assess Anthropogenic Impact , 1996 .

[14]  Robert B. Blair,et al.  Butterfly diversity and human land use: Species assemblages along an urban gradient , 1997 .

[15]  Peter M. Groffman,et al.  Earthworm abundance and nitrogen mineralization rates along an urban-rural land use gradient , 1997 .

[16]  H. Sukopp,et al.  Urban Ecology — Scientific and Practical Aspects , 1998 .

[17]  R. Pouyat,et al.  Variation in quality and decomposability of red oak leaf litter along an urban-rural gradient , 1999, Biology and Fertility of Soils.

[18]  Steward T. A. Pickett,et al.  THE APPLICATION OF ECOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES TO URBAN AND URBANIZING LANDSCAPES , 2000 .

[19]  R. O’Connor,et al.  Interactive effects of land use and other factors on regional bird distributions , 2000 .

[20]  N. Grimm,et al.  Integrated Approaches to Long-TermStudies of Urban Ecological Systems , 2000 .

[21]  J. P. Collins,et al.  A New Urban Ecology , 2000, American Scientist.

[22]  N. Grimm,et al.  Integrated Approaches to Long-TermStudies of Urban Ecological Systems , 2000 .

[23]  G. Lovett,et al.  Atmospheric deposition to oak forests along an urban - rural gradient. , 2000 .

[24]  Simon A. Levin,et al.  Encyclopedia of Biodiversity , 2000 .

[25]  J. Marzluff,et al.  Avian Ecology and Conservation in an Urbanizing World , 2002, Springer US.

[26]  R. L. Knight,et al.  Songbird and Medium‐Sized Mammal Communities Associated with Exurban Development in Pitkin County, Colorado , 2001 .

[27]  L. Jerzak Synurbanization of the magpie in the Palearctic , 2001 .

[28]  B. Wakeling,et al.  Lizard species distributions and habitat occupation along an urban gradient in Tucson, Arizona, USA , 2001 .

[29]  J. Marzluff Worldwide urbanization and its effects on birds , 2001 .

[30]  W. Zipperer,et al.  Urban ecological systems: linking terrestrial ecological, physical, and socioeconomic components of metropolitan areas , 2001 .

[31]  Nancy B. Grimm,et al.  The Urban Funnel Model and the Spatially Heterogeneous Ecological Footprint , 2001, Ecosystems.

[32]  A. Kinzig,et al.  Urban-Suburban Ecology , 2001 .

[33]  John M. Marzluff,et al.  Restoration of Fragmented Landscapes for the Conservation of Birds: A General Framework and Specific Recommendations for Urbanizing Landscapes , 2001 .

[34]  F. Herzog,et al.  Supplementing Land-Use Statistics with Landscape Metrics: Some Methodological Considerations , 2001, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[35]  M. Alberti,et al.  Quantifying the urban gradient: Linking urban planning and ecology , 2001 .

[36]  R. Shine,et al.  The ecology of an Australian reptile icon: how do blue-tongued lizards (Tiliqua scincoides) survive in suburbia? , 2001 .

[37]  J. Marzluff,et al.  A historical perspective on urban bird research: trends, terms, and approaches , 2001 .

[38]  M. McKinney,et al.  Urbanization, Biodiversity, and Conservation , 2002 .

[39]  Bradley P. Carlin,et al.  Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit , 2002 .

[40]  M. Fraker,et al.  Differences in Growth and Maturation of Blacknose Dace (Rhinichthys atratulus) across an Urban-Rural Gradient , 2002, Copeia.

[41]  J. L. Avondet,et al.  Drosophila (Diptera: Drosophilidae) Response to Changes in Ecological Parameters Across an Urban Gradient , 2003 .

[42]  C. Gries,et al.  Preliminary assessment of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal diversity and community structure in an urban ecosystem , 2003, Mycorrhiza.

[43]  C. Gries,et al.  Socioeconomics drive urban plant diversity , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  M. Carreiro,et al.  Temporal and spatial variations in nitrogen transformations in deciduous forest ecosystems along an urban–rural gradient , 2004 .

[45]  Jianguo Wu,et al.  A gradient analysis of urban landscape pattern: a case study from the Phoenix metropolitan region, Arizona, USA , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[46]  N. McIntyre,et al.  Urban ecology as an interdisciplinary field: differences in the use of “urban” between the social and natural sciences , 2004, Urban Ecosystems.

[47]  C.J.F. ter Braak,et al.  A Theory of Gradient Analysis , 2004 .

[48]  David M. Theobald,et al.  Placing exurban land‐use change in a human modification framework , 2004 .

[49]  H. Howe,et al.  Urban-rural differences in the management of breast cancer , 2004, Cancer Causes & Control.

[50]  Kirstin Dow,et al.  Social dimensions of gradients in urban ecosystems , 2000, Urban Ecosystems.

[51]  Jari Niemelä,et al.  Is there a need for a theory of urban ecology? , 1999, Urban Ecosystems.

[52]  J. Niemelä,et al.  Carabid beetle assemblages (Coleoptera, Carabidae) across urban-rural gradients: an international comparison , 2002, Landscape Ecology.

[53]  Y. Natuhara,et al.  Prediction of species richness of breeding birds by landscape-level factors of urban woods in Osaka Prefecture, Japan , 1999, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[54]  Robert B. Blair,et al.  The Effects of Urban Sprawl on Birds at Multiple Levels of Biological Organization , 2004 .

[55]  Jianguo Wu Effects of changing scale on landscape pattern analysis: scaling relations , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[56]  F. Berkes,et al.  Combining Science and Traditional Ecological Knowledge: Monitoring Populations for Co-Management , 2004 .

[57]  R. Ourso,et al.  Identification of linear and threshold responses in streams along a gradient of urbanization in Anchorage, Alaska* , 2003, Hydrobiologia.

[58]  Andrew J. Hansen,et al.  EFFECTS OF EXURBAN DEVELOPMENT ON BIODIVERSITY: PATTERNS, MECHANISMS, AND RESEARCH NEEDS , 2005 .

[59]  C. Gries,et al.  Spatial variation in soil inorganic nitrogen across an arid urban ecosystem , 2005, Urban Ecosystems.

[60]  Michael A. McCarthy,et al.  Plant traits and local extinctions in natural grasslands along an urban–rural gradient , 2005 .

[61]  S. Pan,et al.  Riparian woody plant diversity and forest structure along an urban-rural gradient , 2005, Urban Ecosystems.

[62]  S. Faeth,et al.  Trophic Dynamics in Urban Communities , 2005 .

[63]  John M. Marzluff,et al.  Island biogeography for an urbanizing world: how extinction and colonization may determine biological diversity in human-dominated landscapes , 2005, Urban Ecosystems.

[64]  W. Zipperer,et al.  Ecosystem processes along an urban-to-rural gradient , 2005, Urban Ecosystems.

[65]  M. Heenen,et al.  Occurrence of Ips typographus (Col., Scolytidae) along an urbanization gradient in Brussels, Belgium , 2005 .

[66]  M. Mcdonnell,et al.  Selecting independent measures to quantify Melbourne's urban–rural gradient , 2006 .

[67]  K. Parris Urban amphibian assemblages as metacommunities. , 2006, The Journal of animal ecology.

[68]  Christopher J. Walsh,et al.  Biological indicators of stream health using macroinvertebrate assemblage composition: a comparison of sensitivity to an urban gradient , 2006 .

[69]  N. McIntyre,et al.  From patterns to emerging processes in mechanistic urban ecology. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[70]  W. Zipperer,et al.  Land use context and natural soil controls on plant community composition and soil nitrogen and carbon dynamics in urban and rural forests. , 2006 .

[71]  Nancy B. Grimm,et al.  Points, patches, and regions: scaling soil biogeochemical patterns in an urbanized arid ecosystem , 2006 .

[72]  Csaba Csuzdi,et al.  Invasive earthworm species and nitrogen cycling in remnant forest patches , 2006 .

[73]  M. L. Cadenasso,et al.  Advancing urban ecological studies: Frameworks, concepts, and results from the Baltimore Ecosystem Study , 2006 .

[74]  Jari Niemelä,et al.  Investigating environmental variation and landscape characteristics of an urban–rural gradient using woodland carabid assemblages , 2006 .

[75]  P. Clergeau,et al.  Using hierarchical levels for urban ecology. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[76]  N. Nakagoshi,et al.  Spatial- temporal gradient analysis of urban green spaces in Jinan, China , 2006 .

[77]  M. McKinney,et al.  Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization , 2006 .

[78]  Patterns of Understory Diversity in Mixed Coniferous Forests of Southern California Impacted by Air Pollution , 2007, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[79]  M. Mcdonnell,et al.  Composition of the plant community in remnant patches of grassy woodland along an urban–rural gradient in Melbourne, Australia , 2007, Urban Ecosystems.

[80]  M. Mcdonnell,et al.  Abundance, species richness and feeding preferences of introduced molluscs in native grasslands of Victoria, Australia. , 2007 .

[81]  E. Clercq,et al.  Relating spatial pattern of forest cover to accessibility , 2007 .

[82]  L. Ziska,et al.  Establishment and persistence of common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) in disturbed soil as a function of an urban–rural macro‐environment , 2007 .

[83]  P. Reich,et al.  Land use and habitat gradients determine bird community diversity and abundance in suburban, rural and reserve landscapes of Minnesota, USA , 2007 .

[84]  Z. Elek,et al.  Composition of terrestrial isopod assemblages along an urbanisation gradient in Denmark , 2007 .

[85]  S. Pickett,et al.  Spatial heterogeneity in urban ecosystems: reconceptualizing land cover and a framework for classification , 2007 .

[86]  Steward T. A. Pickett,et al.  Ecosystem processes along an urban-to-rural gradient , 2005, Urban Ecosystems.

[87]  M. Alberti Advances in Urban Ecology: Integrating Humans and Ecological Processes in Urban Ecosystems , 2008 .

[88]  Marina Alberti,et al.  Advances in Urban Ecology , 2008 .