A Socio‐Psychological Perspective on Team Ambidexterity: The Contingency Role of Supportive Leadership Behaviours
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Zeki Simsek,et al. Distributed Cognition in Top Management Teams and Organizational Ambidexterity , 2017 .
[2] Justin J. P. Jansen,et al. Managers’ Work Experience, Ambidexterity, and Performance: The Contingency Role of the Work Context , 2015 .
[3] Justin J. P. Jansen,et al. Strategic Leadership and Leaders in Entrepreneurial Contexts: A Nexus for Innovation and Impact Missed? , 2015 .
[4] J. Mathieu,et al. A Cross-Level Test of Empowerment and Process Influences on Members’ Informal Learning and Team Commitment , 2015 .
[5] Wendy K. Smith. Dynamic Decision Making: A Model of Senior Leaders Managing Strategic Paradoxes , 2014 .
[6] Frans van den Bosch,et al. Top Management Team Shared Leadership and Organizational Ambidexterity: a Moderated Mediation Framework , 2014 .
[7] A. Tsui,et al. A SOCIAL-STRUCTURAL PERSPECTIVE ON EMPLOYEE- ORGANIZATION RELATIONSHIPS AND TEAM CREATIVITY , 2014 .
[8] David J. Whitney,et al. A Meta-Analysis of Cohesion and Performance , 2012 .
[9] Pankaj C. Patel,et al. How Do Young Firms Manage Product Portfolio Complexity? The Role of Absorptive Capacity and Ambidexterity , 2012 .
[10] Justin J. P. Jansen,et al. Ambidexterity and performance in multiunit contexts: Cross‐level moderating effects of structural and resource attributes , 2012 .
[11] Murray R. Barrick,et al. Peer-based control in self-managing teams: linking rational and normative influence with individual and group performance. , 2012, The Journal of applied psychology.
[12] N. Bozionelos,et al. Team Exploratory and Exploitative Learning: Psychological Safety, Task Conflict, and Team Performance , 2011 .
[13] Wendy K. Smith,et al. Toward a Theory of Paradox: A Dynamic equilibrium Model of Organizing , 2011 .
[14] Dong Liu,et al. From autonomy to creativity: a multilevel investigation of the mediating role of harmonious passion. , 2011, The Journal of applied psychology.
[15] Rebecca J. Slotegraaf,et al. Product Development Team Stability and New Product Advantage: The Role of Decision-Making Processes , 2011 .
[16] M. Haas. The Double-Edged Swords of Autonomy and External Knowledge: Analyzing Team Effectiveness in a Multinational Organization , 2010 .
[17] Wendy K. Smith,et al. Organizational designs and innovation streams , 2010 .
[18] Dong Liu,et al. Looking at Both Sides of the Social Exchange Coin: A Social Cognitive Perspective on the Joint Effects of Relationship Quality and Differentiation on Creativity , 2010 .
[19] Frank T. Rothaermel,et al. Leveraging internal and external experience: exploration, exploitation, and R&D project performance , 2010 .
[20] Subin Im,et al. Spurring Cross‐Functional Integration for Higher New Product Performance: A Group Effectiveness Perspective* , 2010 .
[21] Roy Gelbard,et al. The importance of innovation leadership in cultivating strategic fit and enhancing firm performance , 2010 .
[22] Diether Gebert,et al. Fostering Team Innovation: Why Is It Important to Combine Opposing Action Strategies? , 2010, Organ. Sci..
[23] J. Stuart Bunderson,et al. Structure and Learning in Self-Managed Teams: Why "Bureaucratic" Teams Can Be Better Learners , 2010, Organ. Sci..
[24] Zeki Simsek,et al. Modelling the Joint Impact of the CEO and the TMT on Organizational Ambidexterity , 2009 .
[25] John E. Mathieu,et al. The motivating potential of teams: Test and extension of Chen and Kanfer's (2006) cross-level model of motivation in teams , 2009 .
[26] Y. Gong. Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: the mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy , 2009 .
[27] Julian Birkinshaw,et al. Organizational Ambidexterity: Balancing Exploitation and Exploration for Sustained Performance , 2009, Organ. Sci..
[28] Constantine Andriopoulos,et al. Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation , 2009, Organ. Sci..
[29] Anthony J. Nyberg,et al. Collective efficacy, group potency, and group performance: meta-analyses of their relationships, and test of a mediation model. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.
[30] Rajesh Sethi,et al. Can Quality‐Oriented Firms Develop Innovative New Products? , 2009 .
[31] Henk W. Volberda,et al. Structural Differentiation and Ambidexterity: The Mediating Role of Integration Mechanisms , 2008, Organ. Sci..
[32] Justin J. P. Jansen,et al. Senior Team Attributes and Organizational Ambidexterity: The Moderating Role of Transformational Leadership , 2008 .
[33] Gabriel Szulanski,et al. The Effects of Conflict Types, Dimensions, and Emergent States on Group Outcomes , 2008 .
[34] Lotte S. Luscher,et al. Organizational Change and Managerial Sensemaking: Working Through Paradox , 2008 .
[35] Francis J. Yammarino,et al. Multi-level nature of and multi-level approaches to leadership. , 2008 .
[36] Tammy L. Rapp,et al. Team Effectiveness 1997-2007: A Review of Recent Advancements and a Glimpse Into the Future , 2008 .
[37] Paul W. Beamish,et al. Building Theoretical and Empirical Bridges Across Levels: Multilevel Research in Management , 2007 .
[38] D. Hambrick,et al. It's All about Me: Narcissistic Chief Executive Officers and Their Effects on Company Strategy and Performance , 2007 .
[39] Murray R. Barrick,et al. The Moderating Role of Top Management Team Interdependence: Implications for Real Teams and Working Groups , 2007 .
[40] Roland Castellanos. A Qualitative Analysis of Conflict Types and Dimensions in Organizational Groups , 2007 .
[41] Cristina B. Gibson,et al. Collective Cognition in Action: Accumulation, Interaction, Examination, and Accommodation in the Development and Operation of Group Efficacy Beliefs in the Workplace. , 2007 .
[42] M. Lubatkin,et al. Ambidexterity and Performance in Small-to Medium-Sized Firms: The Pivotal Role of Top Management Team Behavioral Integration , 2006 .
[43] Elizabeth V. Hobman,et al. The Role of Team Identification in the Dissimilarity-Conflict Relationship , 2006 .
[44] Ken G. Smith,et al. The interplay between exploration and exploitation. , 2006 .
[45] H. Greve,et al. Superman or the Fantastic Four? Knowledge Combination and Experience in Innovative Teams , 2006 .
[46] Sven C. Voelpel,et al. Strategic Management as Organizational Learning: Developing Fit and Alignment through a Disciplined Process , 2005 .
[47] Wendy K. Smith,et al. Managing Strategic Contradictions: A Top Management Model for Managing Innovation Streams , 2005 .
[48] J. Dawson,et al. Validating the organizational climate measure: links to managerial practices, productivity and innovation , 2005 .
[49] J. Mathieu,et al. CREATIVITY AND STANDARDIZATION: COMPLEMENTARY OR CONFLICTING DRIVERS OF TEAM EFFECTIVENESS? , 2005 .
[50] Pamela J. Hinds,et al. Understanding Conflict in Geographically Distributed Teams: The Moderating Effects of Shared Identity, Shared Context, and Spontaneous Communication , 2005 .
[51] Sze-Sze Wong,et al. Distal and Local Group Learning: Performance Trade-offs and Tensions , 2004, Organ. Sci..
[52] C. Moorman,et al. Tradeoffs in marketing exploitation and exploration strategies: The overlooked role of market orientation , 2004 .
[53] C. Shalley,et al. A Little Creativity Goes a Long Way: An Examination of Teams’ Engagement in Creative Processes , 2004 .
[54] Zi-Lin He,et al. Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis , 2004, Organ. Sci..
[55] M. Tushman,et al. The ambidextrous organization. , 2004, Harvard business review.
[56] Dusya Vera,et al. Strategic Leadership and Organizational Learning , 2004 .
[57] Vipin Gupta,et al. Entrepreneurial leadership: developing and measuring a cross-cultural construct , 2004 .
[58] H. Tajfel,et al. The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. , 2004 .
[59] D. Beal,et al. Cohesion and performance in groups: a meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.
[60] Scott B. MacKenzie,et al. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.
[61] Kyle Lewis. Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: scale development and validation. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.
[62] Wilmar B Schaufeli,et al. Receiving instrumental support at work: when help is not welcome. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.
[63] M. Mumford,et al. Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships , 2002 .
[64] Charmine E. J. Härtel,et al. How leaders influence the impact of affective events on team climate and performance in R&D teams , 2002 .
[65] R. Eisenberger,et al. Perceived organizational support: a review of the literature. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.
[66] Allen C. Amason,et al. Understanding the dynamics of new venture top management teams: cohesion, conflict, and new venture performance , 2002 .
[67] R. Roe,et al. Need for leadership as a moderator of the relationships between leadership characteristics and individual outcomes , 2002 .
[68] Amy C. Edmondson,et al. The Local and Variegated Nature of Learning in Organizations: A Group-Level Perspective , 2002, Organ. Sci..
[69] Debra L. Shapiro,et al. Maximizing cross-functional new product teams' innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective. , 2001 .
[70] John E. Mathieu,et al. A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes , 2001 .
[71] Edwin A. Locke,et al. The Relationship of Team Goals, Incentives, and Efficacy to Strategic Risk, Tactical Implementation, and Performance , 2001 .
[72] Daniel C. Smith,et al. Cross-Functional Product Development Teams, Creativity, and the Innovativeness of New Consumer Products , 2001 .
[73] Willow A. Sheremata. Centrifugal and Centripetal Forces in Radical New Product Development Under Time Pressure , 2000 .
[74] G. Graen,et al. AN EXAMINATION OF LEADERSHIP AND EMPLOYEE CREATIVITY: THE RELEVANCE OF TRAITS AND RELATIONSHIPS , 1999 .
[75] A. Edmondson. Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams , 1999 .
[76] A. Bandura. Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.
[77] F. Yammarino,et al. Ceo Charismatic Leadership: Levels-of-Management and Levels-of-Analysis Effects , 1999 .
[78] C. Gibson. Do they do what they Believe they can? Group Efficacy and Group Effectiveness Across Tasks and Cultures , 1999 .
[79] Steve H. Barr,et al. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes the Impact of Perceived Loafing and Collective Efficacy on Group Goal Processes and Group Performance , 2022 .
[80] E. A. Locke,et al. Dispositional effects on job and life satisfaction: the role of core evaluations. , 1998, The Journal of applied psychology.
[81] A. Bandura. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.
[82] K. Jehn. A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in , 1997 .
[83] M. Tushman,et al. Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change , 1996 .
[84] Michael R. Mullen. Diagnosing Measurement Equivalence in Cross-National Research , 1995 .
[85] J. Edwards. The Study of Congruence in Organizational Behavior Research: Critique and a Proposed Alternative , 1994 .
[86] M. Arthur,et al. The Motivational Effects of Charismatic Leadership: A Self-Concept Based Theory , 1993 .
[87] J. March. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.
[88] Terry L. Childers,et al. Leadership substitutes as moderators of sales supervisory behavior , 1990 .
[89] W. P. Barnett,et al. Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. , 1989 .
[90] L. James,et al. Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. , 1984 .
[91] G. Hofstede,et al. Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .
[92] John M. Jermier,et al. Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement , 1978 .
[93] M. Aiken,et al. Relationship of centralization to other structural properties. , 1967 .
[94] V. Vroom. Work and motivation , 1964 .
[95] Wendy K. Smith,et al. TOWARD A THEORY OF PARADOX : A DYNAMIC EQUILIBRIUM MODEL OF ORGANIZING , 2011 .
[96] Wendy K. Smith,et al. Managing Strategic Contradictions: A Top Management Team Model for Simultaneously Exploring and Exploiting , 2010 .
[97] Patrick G. Maggitti,et al. Top management attention to innovation: The role of search selection and intensity , 2009 .
[98] Daniel A. Levinthal,et al. Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .
[99] Clark G. Gilbert,et al. Change in the Presence of Residual Fit: Can Competing Frames Coexist? , 2006, Organ. Sci..
[100] C. Gibson,et al. THE ANTECEDENTS , CONSEQUENCES , AND MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY , 2004 .
[101] Kara A. Incalcaterra,et al. A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.
[102] R. Golembiewski. Handbook of Organizational Behavior , 2001 .
[103] L. V. Dyne,et al. Individualism-Collectivism as a Boundary Condition for Effectiveness of Minority Influence in Decision Making. , 2001, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.
[104] P. Bliese. Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. , 2000 .
[105] J. Hackman,et al. The design of work teams , 1987 .
[106] A. V. D. Ven,et al. Central problems in the management of innovation , 1986 .
[107] D. Rousseau. Issues of level in organizational research: Multi-level and cross-level perspectives. , 1985 .
[108] Arie Nadler,et al. Recipient reactions to aid , 1982 .
[109] Sydney Gregory,et al. Culture's consequences: international differences in work-related values , 1982 .
[110] P. Blau. Exchange and Power in Social Life , 1964 .