A Socio‐Psychological Perspective on Team Ambidexterity: The Contingency Role of Supportive Leadership Behaviours

In addressing the notion of team ambidexterity, we propose that socio-psychological factors (i.e., team cohesion and team efficacy) may help team members to resolve paradoxical challenges and to combine exploratory and exploitative learning efforts. In addition, we theorize that senior executives may play an important role in facilitating the emergence of ambidexterity at lower hierarchical levels. In doing so, we develop a multilevel contingency framework and propose that the effectiveness of teams to achieve ambidexterity is contingent upon supportive leadership behaviours at the organizational-level. Using multilevel, multisource, and temporally separated data on 87 teams within 37 high-tech and pharmaceutical firms, we not only reveal how team cohesion and efficacy may matter for the emergence of team ambidexterity but also show that the effectiveness of supportive leadership behaviours from senior executives varies across cohesive and efficacious teams.

[1]  Zeki Simsek,et al.  Distributed Cognition in Top Management Teams and Organizational Ambidexterity , 2017 .

[2]  Justin J. P. Jansen,et al.  Managers’ Work Experience, Ambidexterity, and Performance: The Contingency Role of the Work Context , 2015 .

[3]  Justin J. P. Jansen,et al.  Strategic Leadership and Leaders in Entrepreneurial Contexts: A Nexus for Innovation and Impact Missed? , 2015 .

[4]  J. Mathieu,et al.  A Cross-Level Test of Empowerment and Process Influences on Members’ Informal Learning and Team Commitment , 2015 .

[5]  Wendy K. Smith Dynamic Decision Making: A Model of Senior Leaders Managing Strategic Paradoxes , 2014 .

[6]  Frans van den Bosch,et al.  Top Management Team Shared Leadership and Organizational Ambidexterity: a Moderated Mediation Framework , 2014 .

[7]  A. Tsui,et al.  A SOCIAL-STRUCTURAL PERSPECTIVE ON EMPLOYEE- ORGANIZATION RELATIONSHIPS AND TEAM CREATIVITY , 2014 .

[8]  David J. Whitney,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Cohesion and Performance , 2012 .

[9]  Pankaj C. Patel,et al.  How Do Young Firms Manage Product Portfolio Complexity? The Role of Absorptive Capacity and Ambidexterity , 2012 .

[10]  Justin J. P. Jansen,et al.  Ambidexterity and performance in multiunit contexts: Cross‐level moderating effects of structural and resource attributes , 2012 .

[11]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Peer-based control in self-managing teams: linking rational and normative influence with individual and group performance. , 2012, The Journal of applied psychology.

[12]  N. Bozionelos,et al.  Team Exploratory and Exploitative Learning: Psychological Safety, Task Conflict, and Team Performance , 2011 .

[13]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  Toward a Theory of Paradox: A Dynamic equilibrium Model of Organizing , 2011 .

[14]  Dong Liu,et al.  From autonomy to creativity: a multilevel investigation of the mediating role of harmonious passion. , 2011, The Journal of applied psychology.

[15]  Rebecca J. Slotegraaf,et al.  Product Development Team Stability and New Product Advantage: The Role of Decision-Making Processes , 2011 .

[16]  M. Haas The Double-Edged Swords of Autonomy and External Knowledge: Analyzing Team Effectiveness in a Multinational Organization , 2010 .

[17]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  Organizational designs and innovation streams , 2010 .

[18]  Dong Liu,et al.  Looking at Both Sides of the Social Exchange Coin: A Social Cognitive Perspective on the Joint Effects of Relationship Quality and Differentiation on Creativity , 2010 .

[19]  Frank T. Rothaermel,et al.  Leveraging internal and external experience: exploration, exploitation, and R&D project performance , 2010 .

[20]  Subin Im,et al.  Spurring Cross‐Functional Integration for Higher New Product Performance: A Group Effectiveness Perspective* , 2010 .

[21]  Roy Gelbard,et al.  The importance of innovation leadership in cultivating strategic fit and enhancing firm performance , 2010 .

[22]  Diether Gebert,et al.  Fostering Team Innovation: Why Is It Important to Combine Opposing Action Strategies? , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[23]  J. Stuart Bunderson,et al.  Structure and Learning in Self-Managed Teams: Why "Bureaucratic" Teams Can Be Better Learners , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[24]  Zeki Simsek,et al.  Modelling the Joint Impact of the CEO and the TMT on Organizational Ambidexterity , 2009 .

[25]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  The motivating potential of teams: Test and extension of Chen and Kanfer's (2006) cross-level model of motivation in teams , 2009 .

[26]  Y. Gong Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: the mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy , 2009 .

[27]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity: Balancing Exploitation and Exploration for Sustained Performance , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[28]  Constantine Andriopoulos,et al.  Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[29]  Anthony J. Nyberg,et al.  Collective efficacy, group potency, and group performance: meta-analyses of their relationships, and test of a mediation model. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[30]  Rajesh Sethi,et al.  Can Quality‐Oriented Firms Develop Innovative New Products? , 2009 .

[31]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Structural Differentiation and Ambidexterity: The Mediating Role of Integration Mechanisms , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[32]  Justin J. P. Jansen,et al.  Senior Team Attributes and Organizational Ambidexterity: The Moderating Role of Transformational Leadership , 2008 .

[33]  Gabriel Szulanski,et al.  The Effects of Conflict Types, Dimensions, and Emergent States on Group Outcomes , 2008 .

[34]  Lotte S. Luscher,et al.  Organizational Change and Managerial Sensemaking: Working Through Paradox , 2008 .

[35]  Francis J. Yammarino,et al.  Multi-level nature of and multi-level approaches to leadership. , 2008 .

[36]  Tammy L. Rapp,et al.  Team Effectiveness 1997-2007: A Review of Recent Advancements and a Glimpse Into the Future , 2008 .

[37]  Paul W. Beamish,et al.  Building Theoretical and Empirical Bridges Across Levels: Multilevel Research in Management , 2007 .

[38]  D. Hambrick,et al.  It's All about Me: Narcissistic Chief Executive Officers and Their Effects on Company Strategy and Performance , 2007 .

[39]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  The Moderating Role of Top Management Team Interdependence: Implications for Real Teams and Working Groups , 2007 .

[40]  Roland Castellanos A Qualitative Analysis of Conflict Types and Dimensions in Organizational Groups , 2007 .

[41]  Cristina B. Gibson,et al.  Collective Cognition in Action: Accumulation, Interaction, Examination, and Accommodation in the Development and Operation of Group Efficacy Beliefs in the Workplace. , 2007 .

[42]  M. Lubatkin,et al.  Ambidexterity and Performance in Small-to Medium-Sized Firms: The Pivotal Role of Top Management Team Behavioral Integration , 2006 .

[43]  Elizabeth V. Hobman,et al.  The Role of Team Identification in the Dissimilarity-Conflict Relationship , 2006 .

[44]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  The interplay between exploration and exploitation. , 2006 .

[45]  H. Greve,et al.  Superman or the Fantastic Four? Knowledge Combination and Experience in Innovative Teams , 2006 .

[46]  Sven C. Voelpel,et al.  Strategic Management as Organizational Learning: Developing Fit and Alignment through a Disciplined Process , 2005 .

[47]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  Managing Strategic Contradictions: A Top Management Model for Managing Innovation Streams , 2005 .

[48]  J. Dawson,et al.  Validating the organizational climate measure: links to managerial practices, productivity and innovation , 2005 .

[49]  J. Mathieu,et al.  CREATIVITY AND STANDARDIZATION: COMPLEMENTARY OR CONFLICTING DRIVERS OF TEAM EFFECTIVENESS? , 2005 .

[50]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Understanding Conflict in Geographically Distributed Teams: The Moderating Effects of Shared Identity, Shared Context, and Spontaneous Communication , 2005 .

[51]  Sze-Sze Wong,et al.  Distal and Local Group Learning: Performance Trade-offs and Tensions , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[52]  C. Moorman,et al.  Tradeoffs in marketing exploitation and exploration strategies: The overlooked role of market orientation , 2004 .

[53]  C. Shalley,et al.  A Little Creativity Goes a Long Way: An Examination of Teams’ Engagement in Creative Processes , 2004 .

[54]  Zi-Lin He,et al.  Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[55]  M. Tushman,et al.  The ambidextrous organization. , 2004, Harvard business review.

[56]  Dusya Vera,et al.  Strategic Leadership and Organizational Learning , 2004 .

[57]  Vipin Gupta,et al.  Entrepreneurial leadership: developing and measuring a cross-cultural construct , 2004 .

[58]  H. Tajfel,et al.  The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. , 2004 .

[59]  D. Beal,et al.  Cohesion and performance in groups: a meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[60]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[61]  Kyle Lewis Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: scale development and validation. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[62]  Wilmar B Schaufeli,et al.  Receiving instrumental support at work: when help is not welcome. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[63]  M. Mumford,et al.  Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships , 2002 .

[64]  Charmine E. J. Härtel,et al.  How leaders influence the impact of affective events on team climate and performance in R&D teams , 2002 .

[65]  R. Eisenberger,et al.  Perceived organizational support: a review of the literature. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[66]  Allen C. Amason,et al.  Understanding the dynamics of new venture top management teams: cohesion, conflict, and new venture performance , 2002 .

[67]  R. Roe,et al.  Need for leadership as a moderator of the relationships between leadership characteristics and individual outcomes , 2002 .

[68]  Amy C. Edmondson,et al.  The Local and Variegated Nature of Learning in Organizations: A Group-Level Perspective , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[69]  Debra L. Shapiro,et al.  Maximizing cross-functional new product teams' innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective. , 2001 .

[70]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes , 2001 .

[71]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  The Relationship of Team Goals, Incentives, and Efficacy to Strategic Risk, Tactical Implementation, and Performance , 2001 .

[72]  Daniel C. Smith,et al.  Cross-Functional Product Development Teams, Creativity, and the Innovativeness of New Consumer Products , 2001 .

[73]  Willow A. Sheremata Centrifugal and Centripetal Forces in Radical New Product Development Under Time Pressure , 2000 .

[74]  G. Graen,et al.  AN EXAMINATION OF LEADERSHIP AND EMPLOYEE CREATIVITY: THE RELEVANCE OF TRAITS AND RELATIONSHIPS , 1999 .

[75]  A. Edmondson Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams , 1999 .

[76]  A. Bandura Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[77]  F. Yammarino,et al.  Ceo Charismatic Leadership: Levels-of-Management and Levels-of-Analysis Effects , 1999 .

[78]  C. Gibson Do they do what they Believe they can? Group Efficacy and Group Effectiveness Across Tasks and Cultures , 1999 .

[79]  Steve H. Barr,et al.  Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes the Impact of Perceived Loafing and Collective Efficacy on Group Goal Processes and Group Performance , 2022 .

[80]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Dispositional effects on job and life satisfaction: the role of core evaluations. , 1998, The Journal of applied psychology.

[81]  A. Bandura Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[82]  K. Jehn A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in , 1997 .

[83]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change , 1996 .

[84]  Michael R. Mullen Diagnosing Measurement Equivalence in Cross-National Research , 1995 .

[85]  J. Edwards The Study of Congruence in Organizational Behavior Research: Critique and a Proposed Alternative , 1994 .

[86]  M. Arthur,et al.  The Motivational Effects of Charismatic Leadership: A Self-Concept Based Theory , 1993 .

[87]  J. March Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[88]  Terry L. Childers,et al.  Leadership substitutes as moderators of sales supervisory behavior , 1990 .

[89]  W. P. Barnett,et al.  Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. , 1989 .

[90]  L. James,et al.  Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. , 1984 .

[91]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[92]  John M. Jermier,et al.  Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement , 1978 .

[93]  M. Aiken,et al.  Relationship of centralization to other structural properties. , 1967 .

[94]  V. Vroom Work and motivation , 1964 .

[95]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  TOWARD A THEORY OF PARADOX : A DYNAMIC EQUILIBRIUM MODEL OF ORGANIZING , 2011 .

[96]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  Managing Strategic Contradictions: A Top Management Team Model for Simultaneously Exploring and Exploiting , 2010 .

[97]  Patrick G. Maggitti,et al.  Top management attention to innovation: The role of search selection and intensity , 2009 .

[98]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[99]  Clark G. Gilbert,et al.  Change in the Presence of Residual Fit: Can Competing Frames Coexist? , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[100]  C. Gibson,et al.  THE ANTECEDENTS , CONSEQUENCES , AND MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY , 2004 .

[101]  Kara A. Incalcaterra,et al.  A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[102]  R. Golembiewski Handbook of Organizational Behavior , 2001 .

[103]  L. V. Dyne,et al.  Individualism-Collectivism as a Boundary Condition for Effectiveness of Minority Influence in Decision Making. , 2001, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[104]  P. Bliese Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. , 2000 .

[105]  J. Hackman,et al.  The design of work teams , 1987 .

[106]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Central problems in the management of innovation , 1986 .

[107]  D. Rousseau Issues of level in organizational research: Multi-level and cross-level perspectives. , 1985 .

[108]  Arie Nadler,et al.  Recipient reactions to aid , 1982 .

[109]  Sydney Gregory,et al.  Culture's consequences: international differences in work-related values , 1982 .

[110]  P. Blau Exchange and Power in Social Life , 1964 .