Reaching the U.S. Cell Phone Generation Comparison of Cell Phone Survey Results with an Ongoing Landline Telephone Survey

Noncoverage rates in U.S. landline-based telephone samples due to cell phone only households (i.e., households with no landline but accessible by cell phone) and the corresponding potential for bias in estimates from surveys that sample only from landline frames are growing issues. Building on some of the few published studies that focus on this problem, a study was conducted in three states (Georgia, New Mexico, and Pennsylvania) as part of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), the world's largest ongoing public health telephone survey, to evaluate the effectiveness of conducting the BRFSS interview with a sample drawn from dedicated cell phone telephone exchanges and mixed-use (landline and cell phone) exchanges. Approximately 600 interviews were conducted in each of two groups: cell phone only adults (n = 572) and adults with both a landline and a cell phone (n = 592). Making comparisons with data from the ongoing, landline-based BRFSS survey, we report on response rates, demographic characteristics of respondents, key survey estimates of health conditions and risk behaviors, and survey costs. The methods used in this study have wide application for other U.S. telephone surveys.

[1]  Ali H Mokdad,et al.  Public health surveillance for behavioral risk factors in a changing environment. Recommendations from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Team. , 2003, MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports.

[2]  Michael W. Link,et al.  Leaving Answering Machine Messages: Do they Increase Response Rates for RDD Surveys? , 2005 .

[3]  J. Michael Brick,et al.  Household Telephone Service and Usage Patterns in the United states in 2004: Implications for Telephone Samples , 2007 .

[4]  S. Blumberg,et al.  Telephone coverage and health survey estimates: evaluating the need for concern about wireless substitution. , 2006, American journal of public health.

[5]  Meena Khare,et al.  Response Rates: How have they Changed and Where are they Headed? , 2007 .

[6]  J. Michael Brick,et al.  Cell Phone Survey Feasibility in The U.S.: Sampling and Calling Cell Numbers Versus Landline Numbers , 2007 .

[7]  J. Michael Brick,et al.  Nonresponse Bias in a Dual Frame Sample of Cell and Landline Numbers , 2006 .

[8]  S. Keeter The Impact of Cell Phone Noncoverage Bias on Polling in the 2004 Presidential Election , 2006 .

[9]  Edith D. de Leeuw,et al.  Advances in Telephone Survey Methodology , 2007 .

[10]  Vasja Vehovar,et al.  Fitting disposition codes to mobile phone surveys: experiences from studies in Finland, Slovenia and the USA , 2007 .

[11]  Mario Callegaro,et al.  Using Text Messages in U.S. Mobile Phone Surveys , 2007 .