论文信息 - A Multitude of Opinions: Mining Online Rating Data

A Multitude of Opinions: Mining Online Rating Data

Online rating system is a popular feature of Web 2.0 applications. It typically involves a set of reviewers assigning rating scores (based on various evaluation criteria) to a set of objects. We identify two objectives for research on online rating data, namely achieving effective evaluation of objects and learning behaviors of reviewers/objects. These two objectives have conventionally been pursued separately. We argue that the future research direction should focus on the integration of these two objectives, as well as the integration between rating data and other types of data.

Ee-Peng Lim | Hady W. Lauw | Hady W. Lauw | Ee-Peng Lim

[1] Ke Wang,et al. Summarizing Review Scores of "Unequal" Reviewers , 2007, SDM.

[2] H. Arkes. The Nonuse of Psychological Research at Two Federal Agencies , 2003, Psychological science.

[3] Jakob Nielsen,et al. Automating the assignment of submitted manuscripts to reviewers , 1992, SIGIR '92.

[4] Ke Wang,et al. Bias and controversy: beyond the statistical deviation , 2006, KDD '06.

[5] G. Grimmett,et al. Probability and random processes , 2002 .

[6] A. Greenwald,et al. Grading leniency is a removable contaminant of student ratings. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[7] Jiawei Han,et al. Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques , 2000 .

[8] H. J. Bernardin,et al. Conscientiousness and agreeableness as predictors of rating leniency. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[9] Jacob Cohen,et al. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[10] Jacob Cohen,et al. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[11] M. Hakel,et al. An Examination of Sources of Peer-Review Bias , 2006, Psychological science.

[12] Michael J. Pazzani,et al. Mining for proposal reviewers: lessons learned at the national science foundation , 2006, KDD '06.