Cognition, Metacognition, and the Design of Maps
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Edward R. Tufte,et al. The Visual Display of Quantitative Information , 1986 .
[2] Mary Hegarty,et al. Thinking about the weather: How display salience and knowledge affect performance in a graphic inference task. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[3] Richard Lowe,et al. Animation and learning: selective processing of information in dynamic graphics , 2003 .
[4] H. Wainer,et al. Alternative Displays for Communicating NAEP Results: A Redesign and Validity Study , 1999 .
[5] Christopher D. Wickens,et al. Attentional Filtering in the Design of Electronic Map Displays: A Comparison of Color Coding, Intensity Coding, and Decluttering Techniques , 2001, Hum. Factors.
[6] Harvey S. Smallman,et al. Naive Realism: Misplaced Faith in Realistic Displays , 2005 .
[7] Eytan Adar,et al. Benefitting InfoVis with Visual Difficulties , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.
[8] Peter C.-H. Cheng,et al. Modeling the Effect of Task and Graphical Representation on Response Latency in a Graph Reading Task , 2003, Hum. Factors.
[9] Barbara Tversky,et al. Reading bar graphs: Effects of extraneous depth cues and graphical context. , 1998 .
[10] Stephen Michael Kosslyn,et al. Graph Design for the Eye and Mind , 2006 .
[11] Mary Hegarty,et al. Expertise, Spatial Ability and Intuition in the Use of Complex Visual Displays , 2007 .
[12] G. Underwood,et al. Something Overlooked? How experts in change detection use visual saliency , 2010 .
[13] Mary Hegarty,et al. Naïve Cartography: How Intuitions about Display Configuration Can Hurt Performance , 2009, Cartogr. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Geovisualization.
[14] Pat Hanrahan,et al. Show Me: Automatic Presentation for Visual Analysis , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.
[15] John J. Bertin,et al. The semiology of graphics , 1983 .
[16] Melissa R. Beck,et al. Measuring search efficiency in complex visual search tasks: global and local clutter. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.
[17] Mary Hegarty,et al. Cognitively Inspired and Perceptually Salient Graphic Displays for Efficient Spatial Inference Making , 2010 .
[18] C. Melody Carswell,et al. Graphing in depth: Perspectives on the use of three-dimensional graphs to represent lower-dimensional data. , 1991 .
[19] Christopher D. Wickens,et al. The Proximity Compatibility Principle: Its Psychological Foundation and Relevance to Display Design , 1995, Hum. Factors.
[20] Alan G. Sanfey,et al. Does Evidence Presentation Format Affect Judgment? An Experimental Evaluation of Displays of Data for Judgments , 1998 .
[21] Mary Hegarty,et al. Effects of knowledge and display design on comprehension of complex graphics , 2010 .
[22] H. Smallman,et al. Choosing and using geospatial displays: effects of design on performance and metacognition. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.
[23] Yvonne Rogers,et al. External cognition: how do graphical representations work? , 1996, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..
[24] Raj M Ratwani,et al. Thinking graphically: Connecting vision and cognition during graph comprehension. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.
[25] R. Lloyd,et al. VISUAL AND STATISTICAL COMPARISON OF CHOROPLETH MAPS , 1977 .
[26] Harvey S. Smallman,et al. The Use of 2D and 3D Displays for Shape-Understanding versus Relative-Position Tasks , 2001, Hum. Factors.
[27] Christopher D. Wickens,et al. When Users Want What's not Best for Them , 1995 .