The polarization of atomic line radiation excited by electron impact

The dipole radiation emitted by an atom excited by a unidirectional electron beam has a nonuniform angular distribution which is simply related to the percentage polarization P of the radiation emitted perpendicular to the beam. P was first calculated using the OppenheimerPenney (O.-P.) theory. In this theory the probability of excitation of an upper quantum state and the probability of subsequent emission of a polarized photon from such a state are considered independently. P is finally expressed in terms of the cross-sections QM for excitation of states of definite component of angular momentum along the direction of the electron beam. In general, P is dependent on detailed numerical calculations of QM j, but the selection rule A = 0 removes this dependence at threshold. In the O.-P. theory allowance may be made for fine structure and hyperfine structure, but the theory is ambiguous when the f.s. or h.f.s. separations are comparable with the line width. A theory is therefore developed which is based on the calculation of the probability of a polarized photon being emitted by the complete system of atom + electron. The ambiguity of the O.-P. theory is removed by integration over line profiles, but the expressions reduce to O.-P. expressions when the f.s. or h.f.s. separations are much smaller or much larger than the line width. The Lyot line of hydrogen is an intermediate case for which the line widths and the h.f.s. separations are comparable. Assuming the validity of the Born approximation, a simple expression is obtained which allows the QM to be calculated from the angular distribution of the scattered electrons. Theoretical predictions are compared with experimental results. For the Na£) lines the predicted polarization is small enough to escape experimental detection. Polarizations observed by - Skinner & Appleyard in 1927 for various Hg lines rise to maxima with decreasing electron energy, and then tend to values close to zero at threshold. These experimental results at low energies appear to be inexplicable in terms of the reactions considered, but if the polarization curve above the maximum is extrapolated to threshold, the theory and experiment are found to be in reasonable agreement. Further experimental work is thought to be desirable

[1]  N. Mott,et al.  The theory of atomic collisions , 1985 .

[2]  E. Gerjuoy,et al.  Some Consequences of the Compound Ion Model , 1958 .

[3]  H. Massey,et al.  The Excitation of the 2p State of Hydrogen by Slow Electrons - Distorted Wave Treatment , 1958 .

[4]  W. Lamb.  Microwave Technique for Determining the Fine Structure of the Helium Atom , 1957 .

[5]  H. Dehmelt,et al.  Paramagnetic Resonance Reorientation of Atoms and Ions Aligned by Electron Impact , 1956 .

[6]  M. Seaton.  Cross Sections for 2s-2p Transitions in H and 3s-3p Transitions in Na Produced by Electron and by Proton Impact , 1955 .

[7]  D. R. Bates,et al.  Excitation and ionization of atoms by electron impact - The Born and Oppenheimer approximations part I and part II , 1950, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[8]  E. Wigner.  On the Behavior of Cross Sections Near Thresholds , 1948 .

[9]  W. Penney.  Effect of Nuclear Spin on the Radiation Excited by Electron Impact. , 1932, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  H. Massey,et al.  The Collision of Electrons with Simple Atomic Systems and Electron Exchange , 1931 .

[11]  W. Hanle,et al.  Über Polarisation bei Neon-Elektronenstoßleuchten und Neon-Kanalstrahlleuchten , 1929 .

[12]  K. Steiner.  Die Polarisation des Elektronenstoßleuchtens bei Edelgasen , 1929 .

[13]  J. Oppenheimer.  On the Quantum Theory of Electronic Impacts , 1928 .

[14]  J. Oppenheimer.  On the Quantum Theory of the Polarization of Impact Radiation. , 1927, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  B. Quarder.  Über Polarisation bei Stoßleuchten. I , 1927 .

[16]  H. Olson,et al.  Polarization by Electron Impact , 1926 .

[17]  E. Appleyard,et al.  On the excitation of polarised light by electron impact. II.—Mercury , 1926 .

[18]  F. W. von Batchelder,et al.  Lattice Constants and Brillouin Zone Overlap in Dilute Magnesium Alloys , 1957 .

[19]  W. Heitler,et al.  The quantum theory of radiation , 1936 .

[20]  J. A. Smit.  On the angular distribution of the light-emission, arising from a directed stream of electrons in a gas , 1935 .

[21]  J. Oppenheimer.  Zur Quantenmechanik der Richtungsentartung , 1927 .

[22]  P. D. Foote,et al.  Polarization of Radiation Excited by Electron Impact , 1926 .

[23]  C. Gerthsen,et al.  Prüfung von D‐Leuchten, das von einem nahezu parallelen Elektronenbündel angeregt ist, auf Polarisation , 1925 .