Some Bayesian insights for statistical tolerance analysis

Functionality of assembled products mostly rely on the ability of the manufacturer to produce under some quality requirements. Parts which do not meet these requirements represent a manufacturing waste which can be at the origin of substantial losses in terms of money and credibility. Quality control and defect detection are two keypoints of predictive process management. At the design stage, a statistical tolerance analysis can be performed to predict the process quality. This imply to estimate a so-called defect probability which quantifies the probability that the final assembly does not meet functional requirements. In general, this quantity depends on a number of process specifications (tolerances, capability levels) set a priori by the manufacturer, but also on the monitoring of the process itself since the process parameters (mean shift value and standard deviation) vary statistically for different batches. In this paper, we give an alternative point of view on an existing method, namely the Advanced Probability-based Tolerance Analysis of products (APTA), proposed in literature to estimate the defect probability. This method, originally relying on a double-loop sampling strategy, is revisited within the Bayesian framework, and an augmented approach is proposed to estimate the defect probability in a more efficient way. The efficiency of the augmented approach for solving tolerancing problems with APTA is illustrated on a linear reference test-case.

[1]  Mashaallah Mashinchi,et al.  PROCESS CAPABILITY INDICES AS FUZZY NUMBERS , 2016 .

[2]  M. Balesdent,et al.  Rare Event Probability Estimation in the Presence of Epistemic Uncertainty on Input Probability Distribution Parameters , 2016 .

[3]  Bruno Sudret,et al.  Propagation of Uncertainties Modelled by Parametric P-boxes Using Sparse Polynomial Chaos Expansions , 2015 .

[4]  Jérôme Morio,et al.  Estimation of Rare Event Probabilities in Complex Aerospace and Other Systems , 2015 .

[5]  Nicolas Gayton,et al.  Statistical tolerance analysis of over-constrained mechanisms with gaps using system reliability methods , 2013, Comput. Aided Des..

[6]  Nicolas Gayton,et al.  Statistical tolerance analysis of a hyperstatic mechanism, using system reliability methods , 2012, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[7]  Paul Beaucaire Application des méthodes fiabilistes à l'analyse et à la synthèse des tolérances , 2012 .

[8]  Nicolas Gayton,et al.  APTA: advanced probability-based tolerance analysis of products , 2011 .

[9]  Philipp Limbourg,et al.  Accelerated uncertainty propagation in two-level probabilistic studies under monotony , 2010, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[10]  A. Kiureghian,et al.  Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? , 2009 .

[11]  A. Kiureghian Analysis of structural reliability under parameter uncertainties , 2008 .

[12]  Alex Ballu,et al.  Geometrical reliability of overconstrained mechanisms with gaps , 2008 .

[13]  Jeffrey P. Kharoufeh,et al.  Statistical tolerance analysis for non-normal or correlated normal component characteristics , 2002 .

[14]  A. Kiureghian,et al.  Multiple design points in first and second-order reliability , 1998 .

[15]  Henrik O. Madsen,et al.  Structural Reliability Methods , 1996 .

[16]  Han Ping Hong EVALUATION OF THE PROBABILITY OF FAILURE WITH UNCERTAIN DISTRIBUTION PARAMETERS , 1996 .

[17]  Joshua U. Turner,et al.  Review of statistical approaches to tolerance analysis , 1995, Comput. Aided Des..

[18]  Armen Der Kiureghian,et al.  MEASURES OF STRUCTURAL SAFETY UNDER IMPERFECT STATES OF KNOWLEDGE , 1989 .

[19]  A. Kiureghian,et al.  STRUCTURAL RELIABILITY UNDER INCOMPLETE PROBABILITY INFORMATION , 1986 .

[20]  Victor E. Kane,et al.  Process Capability Indices , 1986 .

[21]  John S. Oakland,et al.  Statistical Process Control , 2018 .

[22]  D. B. Parkinson The Application of Reliability Methods to Tolerancing , 1982 .

[23]  M. Rosenblatt Remarks on a Multivariate Transformation , 1952 .