Clinical and Lifestyle Determinants of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Metrics in Insulin-Treated Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Background There was limited evidence to evaluate the association between lifestyle habits and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) metrics. Thus, we aimed to depict the behavioral and metabolic determinants of CGM metrics in insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods This is a prospective observational study. We analyzed data from 122 insulin-treated patients with T2DM. Participants wore Dexcom G6 and Fitbit, and diet information was identified for 10 days. Multivariate-adjusted logistic regression analysis was performed for the simultaneous achievement of CGM-based targets, defined by the percentage of time in terms of hyper, hypoglycemia and glycemic variability (GV). Intake of macronutrients and fiber, step counts, sleep, postprandial C-peptide-to-glucose ratio (PCGR), information about glucose lowering medications and metabolic factors were added to the analyses. Additionally, we evaluated the impact of the distribution of energy and macronutrient during a day, and snack consumption on CGM metrics. Results Logistic regression analysis revealed that female, participants with high PCGR, low glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and daytime step count had a higher probability of achieving all targets based on CGM (odds ratios [95% confidence intervals] which were 0.24 [0.09 to 0.65], 1.34 [1.03 to 1.25], 0.95 [0.9 to 0.99], and 1.15 [1.03 to 1.29], respectively). And participants who ate snacks showed a shorter period of hyperglycemia and less GV compared to those without. Conclusion: We confirmed that residual insulin secretion, daytime step count, HbA1c, and women were the most relevant determinants of adequate glycemic control in insulin-treated patients with T2DM. In addition, individuals with snack consumption were exposed to lower times of hyperglycemia and GV.

[1]  Eric L. Johnson,et al.  6. Glycemic Targets: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2023. , 2022, Diabetes care.

[2]  M. Dollé,et al.  A randomized crossover trial assessing time of day snack consumption and resulting postprandial glycemic response in a real-life setting among healthy adults , 2022, Chronobiology international.

[3]  Sang-Man Jin,et al.  Effect of structured individualized education on continuous glucose monitoring use in poorly controlled patients with type 1 diabetes: A randomized controlled trial. , 2022, Diabetes research and clinical practice.

[4]  C. Whitton,et al.  Diet and Physical Activity as Determinants of Continuously Measured Glucose Levels in Persons at High Risk of Type 2 Diabetes , 2022, Nutrients.

[5]  Ichiro Kishimoto,et al.  Impact of Lifestyle Behaviors on Postprandial Hyperglycemia during Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adult Males with Overweight/Obesity but without Diabetes , 2021, Nutrients.

[6]  D. Jakubowicz,et al.  Role of High Energy Breakfast “Big Breakfast Diet” in Clock Gene Regulation of Postprandial Hyperglycemia and Weight Loss in Type 2 Diabetes , 2021, Nutrients.

[7]  Yoichi M Ito,et al.  Log-linear relationship between endogenous insulin secretion and glycemic variability in patients with type 2 diabetes on continuous glucose monitoring , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[8]  D. West,et al.  A Comparison of Sedentary Behavior as Measured by the Fitbit and ActivPAL in College Students , 2021, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[9]  M. Rondón,et al.  Clinical Factors Associated with High Glycemic Variability Defined by Coefficient of Variation in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes , 2021, Medical devices.

[10]  I. Shimomura,et al.  Associations between continuous glucose monitoring-derived metrics and arterial stiffness in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes , 2021, Cardiovascular Diabetology.

[11]  Meng Bian,et al.  Glycemic variability: adverse clinical outcomes and how to improve it? , 2020, Cardiovascular Diabetology.

[12]  B. Schwikowski,et al.  Associations between consumption of dietary fibers and the risk of cardiovascular diseases, cancers, type 2 diabetes, and mortality in the prospective NutriNet-Santé cohort. , 2020, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[13]  J. Little,et al.  A low-carbohydrate protein-rich bedtime snack to control fasting and nocturnal glucose in type 2 diabetes: A randomized trial. , 2020, Clinical nutrition.

[14]  S. Yamagishi,et al.  Relationship between glucose variability evaluated by continuous glucose monitoring and clinical factors, including glucagon-stimulated insulin secretion in patients with type 2 diabetes. , 2019, Diabetes research and clinical practice.

[15]  Hoh Peter In,et al.  Mood Prediction of Patients With Mood Disorders by Machine Learning Using Passive Digital Phenotypes Based on the Circadian Rhythm: Prospective Observational Cohort Study , 2019, Journal of medical Internet research.

[16]  G. Brinkworth,et al.  Effects of an energy‐restricted low‐carbohydrate, high unsaturated fat/low saturated fat diet versus a high‐carbohydrate, low‐fat diet in type 2 diabetes: A 2‐year randomized clinical trial , 2018, Diabetes, obesity & metabolism.

[17]  Eyal Dassau,et al.  International Consensus on Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring , 2017, Diabetes Care.

[18]  J. Holst,et al.  Short‐term effects of a low carbohydrate diet on glycaemic variables and cardiovascular risk markers in patients with type 1 diabetes: A randomized open‐label crossover trial , 2017, Diabetes, obesity & metabolism.

[19]  Roy W Beck,et al.  The Fallacy of Average: How Using HbA1c Alone to Assess Glycemic Control Can Be Misleading , 2017, Diabetes Care.

[20]  Tsutomu Hirano,et al.  Relationship between daily and day-to-day glycemic variability and increased oxidative stress in type 2 diabetes. , 2016, Diabetes research and clinical practice.

[21]  Yoshiya Tanaka,et al.  Factors influencing inter‐day glycemic variability in diabetic outpatients receiving insulin therapy , 2016, Journal of diabetes investigation.

[22]  Y. Saisho Postprandial C-Peptide to Glucose Ratio as a Marker of β Cell Function: Implication for the Management of Type 2 Diabetes , 2016, International journal of molecular sciences.

[23]  N. Kaba,et al.  Study of the Effects of Snack-Centered Dietary Education on First-Grade Elementary Students and Duration of These Effects , 2015 .

[24]  M. Orsini Federici,et al.  Assessment of the association between glycemic variability and diabetes-related complications in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. , 2014, Diabetes research and clinical practice.

[25]  Sang-Man Jin,et al.  Clinical factors associated with absolute and relative measures of glycemic variability determined by continuous glucose monitoring: an analysis of 480 subjects. , 2014, Diabetes research and clinical practice.

[26]  E. Kang,et al.  Postprandial C‐peptide to glucose ratio as a predictor of β‐cell function and its usefulness for staged management of type 2 diabetes , 2014, Journal of diabetes investigation.

[27]  D. Klonoff,et al.  Recommendations for standardizing glucose reporting and analysis to optimize clinical decision making in diabetes: the Ambulatory Glucose Profile (AGP). , 2013, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[28]  Y. Chung,et al.  Comparison of nutritional status by energy level of night snack in Korean adults: using the data from 2005 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey , 2012 .

[29]  Frits Holleman,et al.  Glucose variability; does it matter? , 2010, Endocrine reviews.

[30]  C. Schmid,et al.  A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. , 2009, Annals of internal medicine.