Improving response to critical laboratory results with automation: results of a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of an automatic alerting system on the time until treatment is ordered for patients with critical laboratory results. DESIGN Prospective randomized controlled trial. INTERVENTION A computer system to detect critical conditions and automatically notify the responsible physician via the hospital's paging system. PATIENTS Medical and surgical inpatients at a large academic medical center. One two-month study period for each service. MAIN OUTCOMES Interval from when a critical result was available for review until an appropriate treatment was ordered. Secondary outcomes were the time until the critical condition resolved and the frequency of adverse events. METHODS The alerting system looked for 12 conditions involving laboratory results and medications. For intervention patients, the covering physician was automatically notified about the presence of the results. For control patients, no automatic notification was made. Chart review was performed to determine the outcomes. RESULTS After exclusions, 192 alerting situations (94 interventions, 98 controls) were analyzed. The intervention group had a 38 percent shorter median time interval (1.0 hours vs. 1.6 hours, P = 0.003; mean, 4.1 vs. 4.6 hours, P = 0.003) until an appropriate treatment was ordered. The time until the alerting condition resolved was less in the intervention group (median, 8.4 hours vs. 8.9 hours, P = 0.11; mean, 14.4 hours vs. 20.2 hours, P = 0.11), although these results did not achieve statistical significance. The impact of the intervention was more pronounced for alerts that did not meet the laboratory's critical reporting criteria. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the number of adverse events. CONCLUSION An automatic alerting system reduced the time until an appropriate treatment was ordered for patients who had critical laboratory results. Information technologies that facilitate the transmission of important patient data can potentially improve the quality of care.

[1]  D. Classen,et al.  Clinical decision support systems to improve clinical practice and quality of care. , 1998, JAMA.

[2]  Robert A. Jenders,et al.  Towards improved knowledge sharing: assessment of the HL7 Reference Information Model to support medical logic module queries , 1997, AMIA.

[3]  D. Bates,et al.  Systems analysis of adverse drug events. ADE Prevention Study Group. , 1995, JAMA.

[4]  J M Teich,et al.  Coverage List: a provider-patient database supporting advanced hospital information services. , 1994, Proceedings. Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care.

[5]  D. Bates,et al.  Does the computerized display of charges affect inpatient ancillary test utilization? , 1997, Archives of internal medicine.

[6]  C. McDonald,et al.  Reminders to physicians from an introspective computer medical record. A two-year randomized trial. , 1984, Annals of internal medicine.

[7]  N L Jain,et al.  Identification of suspected tuberculosis patients based on natural language processing of chest radiograph reports. , 1996, Proceedings : a conference of the American Medical Informatics Association. AMIA Fall Symposium.

[8]  D. Bates,et al.  Detecting alerts, notifying the physician, and offering action items: a comprehensive alerting system. , 1996, Proceedings : a conference of the American Medical Informatics Association. AMIA Fall Symposium.

[9]  G J Kuperman,et al.  Representing hospital events as complex conditionals. , 1995, Proceedings. Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care.

[10]  Jonathan M. Teich,et al.  How promptly are inpatients treated for critical laboratory results? , 1998, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[11]  Jonathan M. Teich,et al.  Advanced alerting features: displaying new relevant data and retracting alerts , 1997, AMIA.

[12]  G J Kost,et al.  Critical limits for urgent clinician notification at US medical centers. , 1990, JAMA.

[13]  J M Teich,et al.  Computerized physician order entry and quality of care. , 1994, Quality management in health care.

[14]  William W. Stead,et al.  Review: Computer-based Physician Order Entry: The State of the Art , 1994, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[15]  T. Delbanco,et al.  Incidence and characteristics of preventable iatrogenic cardiac arrests. , 1991, JAMA.

[16]  R L Menlove,et al.  The timing of prophylactic administration of antibiotics and the risk of surgical-wound infection. , 1992, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  C. Safran,et al.  Effect of computer-based alerts on the treatment and outcomes of hospitalized patients. , 1994, Archives of internal medicine.

[18]  J. Marc Overhage,et al.  Research Paper: A Randomized Trial of "Corollary Orders" to Prevent Errors of Omission , 1997, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[19]  Stephen B. Johnson,et al.  Design of a clinical event monitor. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[20]  Jonathan M. Teich,et al.  Potential identifiability and preventability of adverse events using information systems. , 1994, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[21]  R M Gardner,et al.  A computerized laboratory alerting system. , 1990, M.D. computing : computers in medical practice.

[22]  T A Pryor,et al.  Rationale for the Arden Syntax. , 1994, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.