STUBBLE DAMAGE AND UNSETTLING INDEXES FOR DIFFERENT CUTTING AND LOADING SYSTEMS

The simultaneous mechanical cutting and loading of the sugarcane may trample the remaining stubbles in the harvested area, thus increasing the damage and unsettling indexes of the stubs remaining in the ground after the harvest, which, in the end, can hamper sugarcane regrowth. To this end, the objective of this work was to evaluate how the cutting and loading systems affect the sugarcane ratoon using statistical process control. The experiment was conducted in an agricultural area in Frutal, MG, in June 2014. The mechanical harvesting was carried out at a 1.1m s-1(4.0 km h-1) average working speed and 1.50m spacing. The statistical design used was completely randomized, based on the concepts of quality control, in which the data were collected during harvesting time. The studied treatments were as follows, basal cut, and the mechanical sets A, B, C and D according to equipment gauge width. The stubble damage and unsettling indexes were the parameters used to determine the quality of the studied process. The Set D with the widest gauge is the best option for mechanical harvesting, loading and transporting of sugarcane since it has significantly lower sugarcane stubble damage and unsettling indexes compared to sets A, B, and C.

[1]  Quality of mechanical peanut sowing and digging using autopilot , 2019, Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental.

[2]  Amit Mitra Control Charts for Variables , 2012 .

[3]  Rouverson Pereira da Silva,et al.  Qualidade do corte basal na colheita mecanizada de cana-de-açúcar em dois tipos de manejo do solo , 2015 .

[4]  R. P. Silva,et al.  STATISTICAL PROCESS CONTROL APPLIED TO MONITOR LOSSES IN THE MECHANIZED SUGARCANE HARVESTING , 2020, Engenharia Agrícola.

[5]  Cristiano Zerbato,et al.  Quality of multi-row harvesting in sugarcane plantations established from pre-sprouted seedlings and billets , 2019 .

[6]  R. P. Silva,et al.  Operational performance and losses in mechanized soybean harvesting as a function of field shape , 2019, Comunicata Scientiae.

[7]  EM Solos,et al.  Manual de métodos de análise de solo. , 2017 .

[8]  R. P. Silva,et al.  SHIFTS AND HARVESTING SYSTEMS ON QUALITY OF IMPURITIES SAMPLES IN SUGARCANE , 2017 .

[9]  Tiago de Oliveira Tavares,et al.  Technical-economic viability of mechanized picking coffee (Coffea arabica L.) in up to three annual operations , 2020, Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research.

[10]  Wilson de Almeida Orlando Junior,et al.  Billet distribution and initial establishment of sugarcane due to the planting shifts , 2018, Australian Journal of Crop Science.

[11]  C. Furlani,et al.  Operational uniformity for a sugarcane planter , 2017 .

[14]  Rouverson Pereira da Silva,et al.  Monitoring of mechanical sugarcane harvesting through control charts , 2015 .

[15]  R. P. Silva,et al.  WEAR QUANTIFICATION OF BASAL CUTTING KNIVES IN SUGARCANE HARVESTING , 2019, Engenharia Agrícola.