Quality, Reliability, Security and Robustness in Heterogeneous Systems

Identifying the boundary nodes of a wireless sensor network (WSN) is one of the prerequisites for healing coverage holes, which belongs to the main problems of QoS in a network. Most of the existing solutions for this problem rely on the usage of coordinates or a relatively even distribution of sensors on the underlying network. However, as equipping localization devices on sensors usually means considerably higher cost, coordinates are often unavailable in low-budget networks. And it is often hard to guarantee the distribution of nodes. Therefore, identifying the boundary nodes without coordinates still faces difficulties. In this paper, we propose a distributed algorithm to solve this problem. In our method, a checking node first finds out all the potential triangles that with vertices from the 1-hop neighbors of the node. Then, the sensor keeps triangles containing it by calculating angles. At last, triangles with gap edges are identified by angle comparison to avoid wrong identification of a boundary node which has a U shaped ring locates beside. Illustrated simulation results show the performance effectiveness of our method, especially in networks with random and uneven sensor deployment.

[1]  Graça Bressan,et al.  Quality metric to assess video streaming service over TCP considering temporal location of pauses , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics.

[2]  Nicolas Staelens,et al.  Measuring video quality in the network: from quality of service to user experience , 2015 .

[3]  Srinivasan Seshan,et al.  A quest for an Internet video quality-of-experience metric , 2012, HotNets-XI.

[4]  Henning Schulzrinne,et al.  QoE matters more than QoS: Why people stop watching cat videos , 2016, IEEE INFOCOM 2016 - The 35th Annual IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[5]  Ramesh K. Sitaraman,et al.  Video Stream Quality Impacts Viewer Behavior: Inferring Causality Using Quasi-Experimental Designs , 2012, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[6]  Widya Silfianti,et al.  Visit Patterns Analysis of Foreign Tourist in Indonesian Territory Using Frequent Pattern Growth (FP-Growth) Algorithm , 2018 .

[7]  Jie Li,et al.  Impact of end-user playout buffer dynamics on HTTP progressive video QoE in wireless networks , 2014, 2014 IEEE 25th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communication (PIMRC).

[8]  Sugato Chakravarty,et al.  Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures , 1995 .

[9]  Yue Cao,et al.  A Survey on Geographic Routing Protocols in Delay/Disruption Tolerant Networks , 2016, Int. J. Distributed Sens. Networks.

[10]  Cristina Hava Muntean,et al.  A novel methodology for mapping objective video quality metrics to the subjective MOS scale , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Broadband Multimedia Systems and Broadcasting.

[11]  Srinivasan Seshan,et al.  Developing a predictive model of quality of experience for internet video , 2013, SIGCOMM.

[12]  Vyas Sekar,et al.  Understanding the impact of video quality on user engagement , 2011, SIGCOMM.

[13]  Phuoc Tran-Gia,et al.  Quantification of YouTube QoE via Crowdsourcing , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia.

[14]  Neal Seitz ITU-T QoS standards for IP-based networks , 2003, IEEE Commun. Mag..