Does the immune system of plant and animal kingdoms share any pathways or mechanisms of action in phytotherapy

The question arises from the need to understand why the use of phytotherapy may modulate the immune responses even in the animal kingdom as reported by some authors.1 In fact, even if the traditional use of herbal medicine products may guarantee efficacy, for very few medical plants scientific data on mechanisms of action are available.2 The term Phytotherapy, derived from the Greek words ‘Phyto’ and ‘therapy’, was introduced into science by the French physician Henri Leclerc (1870-1955) and indicates the therapy practiced with medicaments of vegetable origin. A study conducted by the World Health Organization had reported that about 80% of world’s population relies on traditional medicine. The history of phytotherapy is very old and was presumably one of the first therapeutic methods undertaken by man. Already in ancient times (since the Egyptian and Mesopotamian era), mankind was so fascinated by the therapeutic action of plants that for centuries magical and divine properties were attributed to them. Later on, humans have learnt by experience and observations how to use plants correctly and since the nineteenth century the empirical use of plants has been brought back within the boundaries of rationality and scientific rigor. But in what way has man been using these plants for millenia? These ‘preparations’ of vegetable origin have always been used through essentially three administration routes: at a lesser extent, by local applications or fumigation, otherwise mainly by ingestion. The administration of herbal medicine products through the oral route may represent a crucial point, as we will discuss below, to explain the efficacy of the traditional medicine. Therefore, the text found in the work On Aliment: “In food excellent medication, in food bad medication, bad and good relatively”,3 nowadays attributed to the Hellenistic period, but in Antiquity (by Galenus in particular) erroneously associated with Hippocrates, brings us back to why mankind at some point has started to ingest plants or their fruits, roots and leaves in order to find in them not only nourishment and gratification, but also a therapeutic remedy for its illnesses. Indeed, the idea of using plants as medicine treatment was probably born from fortuitous observations or from the experiences that many plants used in nutrition could also prove to be toxic or poisonous or, better, able to improve disorders. However, also Hippocrates from Cos (around 460 BC-around 375 BC), the father of Western modern medicine, knowing that food was closely linked to health and disease, applied dietetic measures for the benefit of the sick.4 According to the World Health Organization (WHO), every vegetable that contains, in one or more of its organs, pharmacologically active substances deserves the name of a medicinal plant. The pharmacognosy studies have evidenced that the set of these pharmacologically active molecules, called phytocomplexes, have the ability to work in synergy with all components. A phytocomplex represents the integral pharmacological unit of a medical plant. Most of the natural phytocomplexes that exert therapeutic actions, once ingested, have shown to act as antioxidants (thus reducing the levels of free radicals), as anti-inflammatory molecules (thus reducing the risk of chronic inflammatory diseases), as anticancer, antimicrobial and immune modulators.1 Living organisms such as plants and animals can be considered as a laboratory of biosynthesis that must provide not only for their own needs but also for their own defense. The afore mentioned phytocomplexes may, therefore, represent the set of molecules developed even to protect the plant life itself. Indeed, plants as well as animal beings are constantly attacked by environmental pathogens that through their entry into these living organisms look for their survival in turn.

[1]  Peng Li,et al.  Polysaccharide PRM3 from Rhynchosia minima root enhances immune function through TLR4-NF-κB pathway. , 2018, Biochimica et biophysica acta. General subjects.

[2]  W. Park,et al.  Plant Surface Receptors Recognizing Microbe-Associated Molecular Patterns , 2018, Journal of Plant Biology.

[3]  M. Netea,et al.  Innate immune memory: An evolutionary perspective , 2018, Immunological reviews.

[4]  Cristiano Colalto What phytotherapy needs: Evidence‐based guidelines for better clinical practice , 2018, Phytotherapy research : PTR.

[5]  S. Dinesh-Kumar,et al.  Plant-microbe interactions: organelles and the cytoskeleton in action. , 2018, The New phytologist.

[6]  Bangjun Zhou,et al.  Conventional and unconventional ubiquitination in plant immunity. , 2017, Molecular plant pathology.

[7]  G. Coaker,et al.  Plant-Pathogen Effectors: Cellular Probes Interfering with Plant Defenses in Spatial and Temporal Manners. , 2016, Annual review of phytopathology.

[8]  U. Conrath,et al.  Priming for enhanced defense. , 2015, Annual review of phytopathology.

[9]  J. Callis The Ubiquitination Machinery of the Ubiquitin System , 2014, The arabidopsis book.

[10]  T. Sixma,et al.  RBR E3‐ligases at work , 2014, EMBO reports.

[11]  H. Suleria,et al.  Immunity: Plants as Effective Mediators , 2014, Critical reviews in food science and nutrition.

[12]  D. Cárdenas Let not thy food be confused with thy medicine: The Hippocratic misquotation , 2013 .

[13]  D. Artis,et al.  Innate lymphoid cell interactions with microbiota: implications for intestinal health and disease. , 2012, Immunity.

[14]  Zhijian J. Chen,et al.  The role of ubiquitylation in immune defence and pathogen evasion , 2011, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[15]  P. Aich,et al.  Importance of innate mucosal immunity and the promises it holds , 2011, International journal of general medicine.

[16]  Pa-Chun Wang,et al.  Hospital Safety Culture in Taiwan: A Nationwide Survey Using Chinese Version Safety Attitude Questionnaire , 2010, BMC health services research.

[17]  K. Makino,et al.  Hochuekkito, a Kampo (traditional Japanese herbal) Medicine, Enhances Mucosal IgA Antibody Response in Mice Immunized with Antigen-entrapped Biodegradable Microparticles , 2007, Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM.

[18]  B. Pulendran,et al.  Toll-Like Receptor Expression and Responsiveness of Distinct Murine Splenic and Mucosal B-Cell Subsets , 2007, PloS one.

[19]  Y. le Maho,et al.  Innate immunity, assessed by plasma NO measurements, is not suppressed during the incubation fast in eiders. , 2007, Developmental and comparative immunology.

[20]  H. Kiyono,et al.  Innate immunity in the mucosal immune system. , 2006, Current pharmaceutical design.

[21]  G. Perdigón,et al.  The Probiotic Bacterium Lactobacillus casei Induces Activation of the Gut Mucosal Immune System through Innate Immunity , 2006, Clinical and Vaccine Immunology.

[22]  F. Ausubel Are innate immune signaling pathways in plants and animals conserved? , 2005, Nature Immunology.

[23]  M. Vicario,et al.  Immune cell activation and subsequent epithelial dysfunction by Staphylococcus enterotoxin B is attenuated by the green tea polyphenol (-)-epigallocatechin gallate. , 2005, Cellular immunology.

[24]  S. Akira,et al.  Toll-like receptors in innate immunity. , 2004, International immunology.

[25]  Shelley A. Adamo,et al.  How should behavioural ecologists interpret measurements of immunity? , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[26]  R. Luebke,et al.  Quantifying the Relationship Between Multiple Immunological Parameters and Host Resistance: Probing the Limits of Reductionism1 , 2001, The Journal of Immunology.

[27]  H. Kiyono,et al.  Mucosal immune network in the gut for the control of infectious diseases , 2001, Reviews in medical virology.

[28]  R. Raya,et al.  Lactic acid bacteria and their effect on the immune system. , 2001, Current issues in intestinal microbiology.

[29]  A. Ferguson Mucosal immunology. , 1990, Immunology today.