Library Filtering Systems and Prediction of Drug‐Like Properties

[1]  G. Bemis,et al.  Properties of known drugs. 2. Side chains. , 1999, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[2]  Ajay,et al.  Designing libraries with CNS activity. , 1999, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[3]  Darren V. S. Green,et al.  Implementation of a System for Reagent Selection and Library Enumeration, Profiling, and Design , 1999, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[4]  J. Wang,et al.  Toward designing drug-like libraries: a novel computational approach for prediction of drug feasibility of compounds. , 1999, Journal of combinatorial chemistry.

[5]  Ajay,et al.  The SHAPES strategy: an NMR-based approach for lead generation in drug discovery. , 1999, Chemistry & biology.

[6]  Luhua Lai,et al.  Structural Features of Toxic Chemicals for Specific Toxicity , 1999, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[7]  I. Kuntz,et al.  The maximal affinity of ligands. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Brian Hudson,et al.  Strategic Pooling of Compounds for High-Throughput Screening , 1999, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[9]  A. Ghose,et al.  A knowledge-based approach in designing combinatorial or medicinal chemistry libraries for drug discovery. 1. A qualitative and quantitative characterization of known drug databases. , 1999, Journal of combinatorial chemistry.

[10]  Darren V. S. Green,et al.  Selecting Combinatorial Libraries to Optimize Diversity and Physical Properties , 1999, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[11]  R. Spencer,et al.  High-throughput screening of historic collections: observations on file size, biological targets, and file diversity. , 1998, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[12]  H. Kubinyi,et al.  A scoring scheme for discriminating between drugs and nondrugs. , 1998, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[13]  Ajay,et al.  Can we learn to distinguish between "drug-like" and "nondrug-like" molecules? , 1998, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[14]  A. Ghose,et al.  Prediction of Hydrophobic (Lipophilic) Properties of Small Organic Molecules Using Fragmental Methods: An Analysis of ALOGP and CLOGP Methods , 1998 .

[15]  The search for orally active medications through combinatorial chemistry , 1998, Medicinal research reviews.

[16]  Michael M. Hann,et al.  RECAP-Retrosynthetic Combinatorial Analysis Procedure: A Powerful New Technique for Identifying Privileged Molecular Fragments with Useful Applications in Combinatorial Chemistry , 1998, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[17]  Mark A. Murcko,et al.  Virtual screening : an overview , 1998 .

[18]  G. Rishton.  Reactive compounds and in vitro false positives in HTS , 1997 .

[19]  X. Lewell,et al.  Drug-motif-based diverse monomer selection: method and application in combinatorial chemistry. , 1997, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[20]  G. Bemis,et al.  The properties of known drugs. 1. Molecular frameworks. , 1996, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[21]  David J. Cummins,et al.  Molecular Diversity in Chemical Databases: Comparison of Medicinal Chemistry Knowledge Bases and Databases of Commercially Available Compounds , 1996, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[22]  Gordon.  Libraries of non-polymeric organic molecules. , 1995, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[23]  S. Hirono,et al.  Comparison of Reliability of log P Values for Drugs Calculated by Several Methods , 1994 .

[24]  Bruce L. Bush,et al.  PATTY: A programmable atom type and language for automatic classification of atoms in molecular databases , 1993, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[25]  David Weininger,et al.  SMILES. 2. Algorithm for generation of unique SMILES notation , 1989, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[26]  David Weininger,et al.  SMILES, a chemical language and information system. 1. Introduction to methodology and encoding rules , 1988, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..