The development of tool use in children is a key question for the understanding of the development of human cognition. Several authors have studied it to investigate how children explore, evaluate and select alternative strategies for solving problems. In particular, Siegler has used this domain to develop the overlapping waves theory that characterizes how infants continue to explore alternative strategies to solve a particular problem, even when one is currently better than others. In computational models of strategy selection for the problem of integer addition, Shrager and Siegler proposed a mechanism that maintains the concurrent exploration of alternative strategies with use frequencies that are proportional to their performance for solving a particular problem. This mechanism was also used by Chen and Siegler to interpret an experiment with 1.5- and 2.5-year-olds that had to retrieve an out-of-reach toy, and where they could use one of several available strategies that included leaning forward to grasp a toy with the hand or using a tool to retrieve the toy. In this paper, we use this domain of tool use discovery to consider other mechanisms of strategy selection and evaluation. In particular, we present models of curiosity-driven exploration, where strategies are explored according to the learning progress/information gain they provide (as opposed to their current efficiency to actually solve the problem). In these models, we define a curiosity-driven agent learning a hierarchy of different sensorimotor models in a simple 2D setup with a robotic arm, a stick and a toy. In a first phase, the agent learns from scratch how to use its robotic arm to control the tool and to catch the toy, and in a second phase with the same learning mechanisms, the agent has to solve three problems where the toy can only be reached with the tool. We show that agents choosing strategies based on a learning progress measure also display overlapping waves of behavior compatible with the one observed in infants, and we suggest that curiosity-driven exploration could be at play in Chen and Siegler's experiment, and more generally in tool use discovery.
[1]
R. Siegler,et al.
ACROSS THE GREAT DIVIDE : BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN UNDERSTANDING OF TODDLERS ' AND OLDER CHILDREN ' S THINKING Zhe
,
2002
.
[2]
R. Siegler,et al.
I. The Geat Dvide
,
2000
.
[3]
B. Hayden,et al.
The Psychology and Neuroscience of Curiosity
,
2015,
Neuron.
[4]
Pierre-Yves Oudeyer,et al.
How Evolution May Work Through Curiosity-Driven Developmental Process
,
2016,
Top. Cogn. Sci..
[5]
Jeff Shrager,et al.
SCADS: A Model of Children's Strategy Choices and Strategy Discoveries
,
1998
.
[6]
Jun Nakanishi,et al.
Dynamical Movement Primitives: Learning Attractor Models for Motor Behaviors
,
2013,
Neural Computation.
[7]
Rana Esseily,et al.
What Does It Take for an Infant to Learn How to Use a Tool by Observation?
,
2016,
Front. Psychol..
[8]
Pierre-Yves Oudeyer,et al.
Explauto: an open-source Python library to study autonomous exploration in developmental robotics
,
2014,
4th International Conference on Development and Learning and on Epigenetic Robotics.
[9]
Dirk Kraft,et al.
A Survey of the Ontogeny of Tool Use: From Sensorimotor Experience to Planning
,
2013,
IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development.
[10]
R. Siegler.
Emerging Minds: The Process of Change in Children's Thinking
,
1996
.
[11]
Jochen J. Steil,et al.
Goal Babbling Permits Direct Learning of Inverse Kinematics
,
2010,
IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development.
[12]
P. L. Adams.
THE ORIGINS OF INTELLIGENCE IN CHILDREN
,
1976
.
[13]
Pierre-Yves Oudeyer,et al.
Information-seeking, curiosity, and attention: computational and neural mechanisms
,
2013,
Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[14]
Pierre-Yves Oudeyer,et al.
Curiosity-Driven Development of Tool Use Precursors: a Computational Model
,
2016,
CogSci.
[15]
Pierre-Yves Oudeyer,et al.
Active learning of inverse models with intrinsically motivated goal exploration in robots
,
2013,
Robotics Auton. Syst..