Clustering by health professional in individually randomised trials

Patient outcomes in many randomised trials depend crucially on the health professional delivering the intervention, but the resulting clustering is rarely considered in the analysis Almost all trials that randomise individuals assume that the observed outcomes of participants are independent. The validity of this assumption is doubtful, however, in some situations. One example is when more than one health professional (such as surgeons, nurses, general practitioners, or therapists) delivers a non-pharmaceutical intervention to participants. Because health professionals may vary in their effectiveness, observations on participants treated by the same professional may be somewhat similar or clustered. Clustering of outcomes may also appear less obviously (such as in clustering by centre in a multicentre trial) or in a more dominant form (as in cluster randomised trials). In each of these situations the assumption of independence is violated, which means that standard statistical methods are invalid and may give misleading conclusions. The presence of clustering in a trial inflates standard errors and reduces the effective sample size, thus reducing the power of the trial. We examine the prevalence and importance of potential clustering in individually randomised trials and present an example of the effect it can have on the overall results and conclusions of a trial. In a trial comparing a new one stop clinic with a dedicated breast clinic for breast cancer screening,1 patients were randomised to a clinic, where they attended an appointment with one of several consultants. The main outcome was patient anxiety, which is likely to be influenced by the consultant treating the patient, yielding potential clustering by consultant. In this trial the clustering is imposed by the design of the trial because of the interventions being compared and is nested within treatment groups since each consultant participates in one treatment arm only (fig 1). Fig 1 Structure …

[1]  P Jacklin,et al.  Joint teleconsultations (virtual outreach) versus standard outpatient appointments for patients referred by their general practitioner for a specialist opinion: a randomised trial , 2002, The Lancet.

[2]  D. Hoover Clinical trials of behavioural interventions with heterogeneous teaching subgroup effects , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[3]  B. Hurwitz,et al.  Effects of community based nurses specialising in Parkinson's disease on health outcome and costs: randomised controlled trial , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[4]  C. Woodman,et al.  Costs and benefits of a one stop clinic compared with a dedicated breast clinic: randomised controlled trial , 2018 .

[5]  Siep Thomas,et al.  Fusidic acid cream in the treatment of impetigo in general practice: double blind randomised placebo controlled trial , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  Sheldon Greenfield,et al.  Profiling Care Provided by Different Groups of Physicians: Effects of Patient Case-Mix (Bias) and Physician-Level Clustering on Quality Assessment Results , 2002, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[7]  A. Localio,et al.  Adjustments for Center in Multicenter Studies: An Overview , 2001, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[8]  Allan Donner,et al.  Design and Analysis of Cluster Randomization Trials in Health Research , 2001 .

[9]  C. Roberts,et al.  The implications of variation in outcome between health professionals for the design and analysis of randomized controlled trials. , 1999, Statistics in medicine.

[10]  D. Teather,et al.  A comparison of various estimators of a treatment difference for a multi-centre clinical trial. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[11]  S Senn,et al.  Some controversies in planning and analysing multi-centre trials. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[12]  Allan Donner,et al.  Small sample performance of tests of homogeneity of odds ratios in K 2 x 2 tables. , 1992, Statistics in medicine.

[13]  J. Mintz,et al.  Implications of therapist effects for the design and analysis of comparative studies of psychotherapies. , 1991, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[14]  C. Martindale,et al.  The therapist-as-fixed-effect fallacy in psychotherapy research. , 1978, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.