Numerical assessment in the wild: insights from social carnivores

Playback experiments have proved to be a useful tool to investigate the extent to which wild animals understand numerical concepts and the factors that play into their decisions to respond to different numbers of vocalizing conspecifics. In particular, playback experiments have broadened our understanding of the cognitive abilities of historically understudied species that are challenging to test in the traditional laboratory, such as members of the Order Carnivora. Additionally, playback experiments allow us to assess the importance of numerical information versus other ecologically important variables when animals are making adaptive decisions in their natural habitats. Here, we begin by reviewing what we know about quantity discrimination in carnivores from studies conducted in captivity. We then review a series of playback experiments conducted with wild social carnivores, including African lions, spotted hyenas and wolves, which demonstrate that these animals can assess the number of conspecifics calling and respond based on numerical advantage. We discuss how the wild studies complement those conducted in captivity and allow us to gain insights into why wild animals may not always respond based solely on differences in quantity. We then consider the key roles that individual discrimination and cross-modal recognition play in the ability of animals to assess the number of conspecifics vocalizing nearby. Finally, we explore new directions for future research in this area, highlighting in particular the need for further work on the cognitive basis of numerical assessment skills and experimental paradigms that can be effective in both captive and wild settings. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue ‘The origins of numerical abilities’.

[1]  Karen Wynn,et al.  Psychological foundations of number: numerical competence in human infants , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[2]  A. Nieder,et al.  The long and the short of it: Rule-based relative length discrimination in carrion crows, Corvus corone , 2014, Behavioural Processes.

[3]  John Maynard Smith,et al.  The logic of asymmetric contests , 1976, Animal Behaviour.

[4]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  Discrimination of small quantities by fish (redtail splitfin, Xenotoca eiseni) , 2013, Animal Cognition.

[5]  Hans Kruuk,et al.  The Spotted Hyena: A Study of Predation and Social Behavior , 1972 .

[6]  O. Pascalis,et al.  Spontaneous voice–face identity matching by rhesus monkeys for familiar conspecifics and humans , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  M. Hauser,et al.  Does participation in intergroup conflict depend on numerical assessment, range location, or rank for wild chimpanzees? , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[8]  Elizabeth S Spelke,et al.  Origins of Number Sense , 2003, Psychological science.

[9]  C. Flay,et al.  INFLUENCE OF MALE DENSITY ON THE COURTSHIP AND MATING DURATION OF MALE RICE WEEVILS, SITOPHILUS ORYZAE , 2009 .

[10]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Is it only humans that count from left to right? , 2010, Biology Letters.

[11]  R. Gerlai,et al.  Spontaneous discrimination of small quantities: shoaling preferences in angelfish (Pterophyllum scalare) , 2011, Animal Cognition.

[12]  Z. Reznikova,et al.  Quantity judgments in the context of risk/reward decision making in striped field mice: first “count,” then hunt , 2013, Front. Psychology.

[13]  S. Carey,et al.  On the limits of infants' quantification of small object arrays , 2005, Cognition.

[14]  Sarah Benson-Amram,et al.  A comparison of innovative problem-solving abilities between wild and captive spotted hyaenas, Crocuta crocuta , 2013, Animal Behaviour.

[15]  J. Tobias,et al.  Communal singing in the cooperatively breeding subdesert mesite Monias benschi: evidence of numerical assessment? , 2003 .

[16]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Non-verbal numerical cognition: from reals to integers , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[17]  D. Kitchen Alpha male black howler monkey responses to loud calls: effect of numeric odds, male companion behaviour and reproductive investment , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[18]  J. M. Smith,et al.  The Logic of Animal Conflict , 1973, Nature.

[19]  G. Helfman,et al.  Safety in numbers: shoal size choice by minnows under predatory threat , 1991, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[20]  F. Range,et al.  Difference in quantity discrimination in dogs and wolves , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[21]  P. Waser Individual Recognition, Intragroup Cohesion and Intergroup Spacing: Evidence From Sound Playback To Forest Monkeys , 1977 .

[22]  O. Güntürkün,et al.  Evidence for a Numerosity Category that is Based on Abstract Qualities of “Few” vs. “Many” in the Bottlenose Dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[23]  K. Holekamp,et al.  Patterns of Association among Female Spotted Hyenas (Crocuta crocuta) , 1997 .

[24]  S. Carey,et al.  The Representations Underlying Infants' Choice of More: Object Files Versus Analog Magnitudes , 2002, Psychological science.

[25]  J. Mitani,et al.  Hunting Behavior of Chimpanzees at Ngogo, Kibale National Park, Uganda , 2002, International Journal of Primatology.

[26]  Jacky Emmerton,et al.  Scalar effects in the visual discrimination of numerosity by pigeons , 2006, Learning & behavior.

[27]  E. Spelke,et al.  Language and Conceptual Development series Core systems of number , 2004 .

[28]  R. Seyfarth,et al.  The adaptive value of ‘friendships’ to female baboons: experimental and observational evidence , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[29]  G. Rosenthal,et al.  Shoaling decisions in female swordtails: how do fish gauge group size? , 2007 .

[30]  Kay E. Holekamp,et al.  Hunting rates and hunting success in the spotted hyena (Crocuta crocuta) , 1997 .

[31]  Andrew Whiten,et al.  The evolution of animal ‘cultures’ and social intelligence , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[32]  L. Regolin,et al.  Ratio abstraction over discrete magnitudes by newly hatched domestic chicks (Gallus gallus) , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[33]  B. Smuts,et al.  Quantity-based judgments in the domestic dog (Canis lupus familiaris) , 2006, Animal Cognition.

[34]  R. Jaeger,et al.  Salamanders (Plethodon cinereus) go for more: rudiments of number in an amphibian , 2003, Animal Cognition.

[35]  G. Rosenthal,et al.  Shoal Choice in Swordtails when Preferences Conflict , 2005 .

[36]  D. Reby,et al.  Anatomical constraints generate honesty: acoustic cues to age and weight in the roars of red deer stags , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[37]  Claudia Uller,et al.  Quantity discrimination in salamanders , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[38]  M. Beran Monkeys (Macaca mulatta and Cebus apella) track, enumerate, and compare multiple sets of moving items. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[39]  L. Giraldeau,et al.  The Center-Edge Effect - the Result of a War of Attrition between Territorial Contestants? , 1987 .

[40]  J. Vitale,et al.  Cross-modal individual recognition in wild African lions , 2016, Biology Letters.

[41]  R. Seyfarth,et al.  Seeing who we hear and hearing who we see , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  J. Cantlon,et al.  Shared System for Ordering Small and Large Numbers in Monkeys and Humans , 2006, Psychological science.

[43]  J. Call,et al.  Relative quantity judgments in South American sea lions (Otaria flavescens) , 2011, Animal Cognition.

[44]  Leanne Proops,et al.  Cross-modal individual recognition in domestic horses (Equus caballus) extends to familiar humans , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[45]  P. E. Pisa,et al.  Quantity discrimination in felines: a preliminary investigation of the domestic cat (Felis silvestris catus) , 2009, Journal of Ethology.

[46]  R. Wrangham,et al.  Ecological and social factors affect the occurrence and outcomes of intergroup encounters in chimpanzees , 2012, Animal Behaviour.

[47]  J. Fischer,et al.  Sounds and size: identification of acoustic variables that reflect body size in hamadryas baboons, Papio hamadryas , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[48]  Stuart Semple,et al.  Displacement behaviour regulates the experience of stress in men , 2013, Stress.

[49]  T. Dabelsteen,et al.  Acoustic territorial signalling in a small, socially monogamous canid , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[50]  F. Range,et al.  Quantity Discrimination in Wolves (Canis lupus) , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[51]  Kay E. Holekamp,et al.  Sex Differences in Territorial Behavior Exhibited by the Spotted Hyena (Hyaenidae, Crocuta crocuta) , 2001 .

[52]  Peter de Goede,et al.  Effects of personality on territory defence in communication networks: a playback experiment with radio-tagged great tits , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[53]  A. Bisazza,et al.  Spontaneous versus trained numerical abilities. A comparison between the two main tools to study numerical competence in non-human animals , 2014, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[54]  Contact with Human Facilities Appears to Enhance Technical Skills in Wild Vervet Monkeys (Chlorocebus aethiops) , 2011, Folia Primatologica.

[55]  Large quantity discrimination by North Island robins (Petroica longipes) , 2012, Animal Cognition.

[56]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  Quantity discrimination by zebrafish (Danio rerio). , 2015, Journal of comparative psychology.

[57]  S. Sugita,et al.  Quantity discrimination in jungle crows, Corvus macrorhynchos , 2011, Animal Behaviour.

[58]  L. Mech,et al.  WOLF HOWLING AND ITS ROLE IN TERRITORY MAINTENANCE , 1979 .

[59]  E. Font,et al.  Quantity discrimination in Tenebrio molitor: evidence of numerosity discrimination in an invertebrate? , 2008, Animal Cognition.

[60]  Fei Xu,et al.  Numerosity discrimination in infants: Evidence for two systems of representations , 2003, Cognition.

[61]  Craig Packer,et al.  Group territoriality and the benefits of sociality in the African lion, Panthera leo , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[62]  Failure to transfer or train a numerical discrimination using sequential visual stimuli in rats , 1987 .

[63]  Hank Davis,et al.  Discrimination of the number three by a raccoon (Procyon lotor) , 1984 .

[64]  C. Packer,et al.  Cooperation in male lions: kinship, reciprocity or mutualism? , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[65]  E. Natoli,et al.  Free-ranging dogs assess the quantity of opponents in intergroup conflicts , 2010, Animal Cognition.

[66]  D. Reby,et al.  The descended larynx is not uniquely human , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[67]  M. Tomasello,et al.  The role of humans in the cognitive development of apes revisited , 2004, Animal Cognition.

[68]  M. Beran,et al.  Perception of food amounts by chimpanzees based on the number, size, contour length and visibility of items , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[69]  C. Packer,et al.  Adaptations of Female Lions to Infanticide by Incoming Males , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[70]  Kerry E Jordan,et al.  A Shared System of Representation Governing Quantity Discrimination in Canids , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[71]  A. Roulin,et al.  Nestling barn owls assess short-term variation in the amount of vocally competing siblings , 2013, Animal Cognition.

[72]  E. Brannon,et al.  Prosimian Primates Show Ratio Dependence in Spontaneous Quantity Discriminations , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[73]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Arithmetic in newborn chicks , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[74]  L. Mech,et al.  Sexually dimorphic aggression indicates male gray wolves specialize in pack defense against conspecific groups , 2017, Behavioural Processes.

[75]  Sarah Benson-Amram,et al.  Sources of variation in the long-distance vocalizations of spotted hyenas , 2007 .

[76]  R. Heinsohn Group territoriality in two populations of African lions , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[77]  Rebecca J Snyder,et al.  The information content of giant panda, Ailuropoda melanoleuca, bleats: acoustic cues to sex, age and size , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[78]  Robin I. M. Dunbar,et al.  Intergroup Aggression in Chimpanzees and Humans [and Comments and Replies] , 1991, Current Anthropology.

[79]  David Reby,et al.  Cross-modal individual recognition in domestic horses (Equus caballus) , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[80]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  Evidence for Two Numerical Systems That Are Similar in Humans and Guppies , 2012, PloS one.

[81]  Sarah Benson-Amram,et al.  Numerical assessment and individual call discrimination by wild spotted hyaenas, Crocuta crocuta , 2011, Animal Behaviour.

[82]  C. Packer,et al.  Why Lions Form Groups: Food is Not Enough , 1990, The American Naturalist.

[83]  M. Shriver,et al.  Analysis of five Y-specific microsatellite loci in Asian and Pacific populations. , 1999, American journal of physical anthropology.

[84]  Karen McComb,et al.  Maternal grouping as a defense against infanticide by males: evidence from field playback experiments on African lions , 1996 .

[85]  C. Packer,et al.  Roaring and numerical assessment in contests between groups of female lions, Panthera leo , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[86]  J. Shivik,et al.  Tracking of food quantity by coyotes (Canis latrans) , 2011, Behavioural Processes.

[87]  George L. Farnsworth,et al.  NUMERICAL DISCRIMINATION BY WILD NORTHERN MOCKINGBIRDS , 2006 .

[88]  Shao-Wu Zhang,et al.  Numerical Cognition in Bees and Other Insects , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[89]  H. Hofer,et al.  The commuting system of Serengeti spotted hyaenas: how a predator copes with migratory prey. I. Social organization , 1993, Animal Behaviour.

[90]  D. Reby,et al.  Context-Related Variation in the Vocal Growling Behaviour of the Domestic Dog (Canis familiaris) , 2009 .

[91]  Michael J Beran,et al.  Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) enumerate large and small sequentially presented sets of items using analog numerical representations. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[92]  R. Palombit,et al.  Friendships between males and lactating females in a free-ranging group of olive baboons (Papio hamadryas anubis): evidence from playback experiments , 2008, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[93]  Jessica F. Cantlon,et al.  Inherently Analog Quantity Representations in Olive Baboons (Papio anubis) , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[94]  J. Skinner,et al.  Territorial Behaviour by a Clan of Spotted Hyaenas Crocuta crocuta , 2010 .

[95]  P. Szenczi,et al.  More or less: spontaneous quantity discrimination in the domestic cat , 2016, Animal Cognition.

[96]  H S Terrace,et al.  Representation of the numerosities 1-9 by rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[97]  M. Hauser Wild Minds: What Animals Really Think , 2000 .

[98]  R. Wrangham Evolution of coalitionary killing. , 1999, American journal of physical anthropology.

[99]  Numerical discrimination by frogs (Bombina orientalis) , 2014, Animal Cognition.

[100]  C. Tanner Numerical assessment affects aggression and competitive ability: a team-fighting strategy for the ant Formica xerophila , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[101]  M. Beran,et al.  Putting the elephant back in the herd: elephant relative quantity judgments match those of other species , 2012, Animal Cognition.

[102]  C. Wynne,et al.  What counts for dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) in a quantity discrimination task? , 2016, Behavioural Processes.

[103]  W. Fitch Vocal tract length and formant frequency dispersion correlate with body size in rhesus macaques. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[104]  Margaret C Crofoot,et al.  Interaction location outweighs the competitive advantage of numerical superiority in Cebus capucinus intergroup contests , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[105]  I. Pepperberg Evidence for Conceptual Quantitative Abilities in the African Grey Parrot: Labeling of Cardinal Sets , 2010 .

[106]  D. Kitchen Experimental test of female black howler monkey (Alouatta Pigra) responses to loud calls from potentially infanticidal males: effects of numeric odds, vulnerable offspring, and companion behavior. , 2006, American journal of physical anthropology.

[107]  L. Mech,et al.  Group composition effects on aggressive interpack interactions of gray wolves in Yellowstone National Park , 2015 .

[108]  C. Uller,et al.  Horses (Equus caballus) select the greater of two quantities in small numerical contrasts , 2009, Animal Cognition.

[109]  J M Smith,et al.  Evolution and the theory of games , 1976 .

[110]  S. Wich,et al.  PLAYBACKS OF LOUD CALLS TO WILD THOMAS LANGURS (PRIMATES; PRESBYTIS THOMASI): THE EFFECT OF FAMILIARITY , 2002 .

[111]  One, two, three, four, or is there something more? Numerical discrimination in day-old domestic chicks , 2013, Animal Cognition.

[112]  Quantitative abilities in a reptile (Podarcis sicula) , 2017, Biology Letters.

[113]  Onur Güntürkün,et al.  A bottlenose dolphin discriminates visual stimuli differing in numerosity , 2003, Learning & behavior.

[114]  A. Bisazza,et al.  Ontogeny of Numerical Abilities in Fish , 2010, PloS one.

[115]  J. Call,et al.  Discrete quantity judgments in the great apes (Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, Gorilla gorilla, Pongo pygmaeus): the effect of presenting whole sets versus item-by-item. , 2007, Journal of comparative psychology.

[116]  Marco Dadda,et al.  Do fish count? Spontaneous discrimination of quantity in female mosquitofish , 2008, Animal Cognition.

[117]  R. Gerlai,et al.  Can angelfish (Pterophyllum scalare) count? Discrimination between different shoal sizes follows Weber’s law , 2010, Animal Cognition.

[118]  Shigeru Watanabe,et al.  Crows cross-modally recognize group members but not non-group members , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[119]  R. Church,et al.  A mode control model of counting and timing processes. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[120]  Bruce E. Lyon,et al.  Egg recognition and counting reduce costs of avian conspecific brood parasitism , 2003, Nature.

[121]  C. Packer,et al.  Complex cooperative strategies in group-territorial African lions , 1995, Science.

[122]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  Evolutionary and developmental foundations of human knowledge: A case study of mathematics , 2004 .

[123]  L. Regolin,et al.  From small to large: numerical discrimination by young domestic chicks (Gallus gallus). , 2014, Journal of comparative psychology.

[124]  I. Adachi,et al.  Dogs recall their owner's face upon hearing the owner's voice , 2006, Animal Cognition.

[125]  N. R. Franks,et al.  Chimpanzees and the mathematics of battle , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[126]  E Bonabeau,et al.  Scaling in animal group-size distributions. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[127]  Elizabeth M Brannon,et al.  The role of reference points in ordinal numerical comparisons by rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[128]  Susan Carey,et al.  Spontaneous number representation in semi–free–ranging rhesus monkeys , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[129]  Klaus Zuberbühler,et al.  Wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) distinguish between different scream types: evidence from a playback study , 2009, Animal Cognition.

[130]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Mapping number to space in the two hemispheres of the avian brain , 2016, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[131]  L. Regolin,et al.  The use of proportion by young domestic chicks (Gallus gallus) , 2014, Animal Cognition.

[132]  Ramón García,et al.  Displacement , 2018, Humanitarianism: Keywords.

[133]  M. Beran,et al.  Bears ‘count’ too: quantity estimation and comparison in black bears, Ursus americanus , 2012, Animal Behaviour.