Pathology, diagnosis, and classification of pressure ulcers: comparing clinical and imaging techniques

Pressure ulcer classification systems are based on the clinical manifestations of the skin and tissue layer affected rather than underlying pathology. The objective of this study was to compare the validity of the clinical grading of erythema (blanching and nonblanching) with a measurement of skin perfusion. Therefore, an exploratory study comparing erythema with laser Doppler imaging of the sacrum and buttock skin areas was undertaken. Acute and major elective general, vascular, and orthopedic surgical in‐patients, aged 55 years or over with an expected length of hospital stay of 5 or more days were recruited. Fifty laser Doppler images from 37 patients were obtained and included in a discriminant analysis. Discriminant analysis suggested that blanching and nonblanching erythema were physiologically distinct from “normal” skin; clinically, these could be assessed with reasonable accuracy. Imaging also determined that high blood flow of differing intensity characterized blanching and nonblanching erythema. There was no evidence of the “no flow” phenomenon.

[1]  D. E. Sharland,et al.  The Management and Prevention of Pressure Sores , 1982 .

[2]  Dan L Bader,et al.  A theoretical analysis of damage evolution in skeletal muscle tissue with reference to pressure ulcer development. , 2003, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[3]  C. Oomens,et al.  The etiology of pressure ulcers: skin deep or muscle bound? , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[4]  Pressure ulcers in adults: prediction and prevention. Quick reference guide for clinicians. Agency for Health Care Policy And Research. , 1992, Decubitus.

[5]  L C Parish,et al.  Histopathology of the decubitus ulcer. , 1982, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[6]  K. Berecek,et al.  Etiology of decubitus ulcers. , 1975, The Nursing clinics of North America.

[7]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Practical statistics for medical research , 1990 .

[8]  T A Krouskop,et al.  A synthesis of the factors that contribute to pressure sore formation. , 1983, Medical hypotheses.

[9]  Cwj Cees Oomens,et al.  Quantification and localisation of damage in rat muscles after controlled loading; a new approach to study the aetiology of pressure sores. , 2001, Medical engineering & physics.

[10]  E. Bethell Controversies in classifying and assessing grade 1 pressure ulcers. , 2003, Nursing times.

[11]  E. Bosboom Deformation as a trigger for pressure sore related muscle damage , 2001 .

[12]  J. Nixon The pathophysiology and aetiology of pressure ulcers , 2001 .

[13]  J. Nixon,et al.  The diagnosis of early pressure sores: report of the pilot study. , 1999, Journal of tissue viability.

[14]  Nancy Bergstrom,et al.  Predictive Validity of the Braden Scale Among Black and White Subjects , 2002, Nursing research.

[15]  J. Reid,et al.  Towards a consensus: classification of pressure sores. , 1994, Journal of wound care.

[16]  E. Bethell Controversies in classifying and assessing grade I pressure ulcers. , 2003, Journal of wound care.