On the Treatment of Uncertainty and Variability in Making Decisions About Risk

Much attention has been paid to the treatment of dependence and to the characterization of uncertainty and variability (including the issue of dependence among inputs) in performing risk assessments to avoid misleading results. However, with relatively little progress in communicating about the effects and implications of dependence, the effort involved in performing relatively sophisticated risk analyses (e.g., two‐dimensional Monte Carlo analyses that separate variability from uncertainty) may be largely wasted, if the implications of those analyses are not clearly understood by decisionmakers. This article emphasizes that epistemic uncertainty can introduce dependence among related risks (e.g., risks to different individuals, or at different facilities), and illustrates the potential importance of such dependence in the context of two important types of decisions—evaluations of risk acceptability for a single technology, and comparisons of the risks for two or more technologies. We also present some preliminary ideas on how to communicate the effects of dependence to decisionmakers in a clear and easily comprehensible manner, and suggest future research directions in this area.

[1]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Rating the Risks , 1979 .

[2]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Equity and Public Risk , 1980, Oper. Res..

[3]  G. Apostolakis,et al.  Pitfalls in risk calculations , 1981 .

[4]  Stan Kaplan On a "Two-Stage" Bayesian Procedure for Determining ailure Rates from Experimental Data , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[5]  S. Kaplan A Method for Handling Dependencies and Partial Dependencies of Fragility Curves in Seismic Risk Analysis , 1985 .

[6]  Rex V. Brown,et al.  Communicating Uncertainty for Regulatory Decisions , 1987 .

[7]  P. Slovic Perception of risk. , 1987, Science.

[8]  Vicki M. Bier,et al.  On the Treatment of Dependence in Making Decisions About Risk , 1989 .

[9]  Max Henrion,et al.  Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis , 1990 .

[10]  J S Evans,et al.  The effect of neglecting correlations when propagating uncertainty and estimating the population distribution of risk. , 1992, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[11]  A C Cullen,et al.  The sensitivity of probabilistic risk assessment results to alternative model structures: a case study of municipal waste incineration. , 1995, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[12]  M. Elisabeth Paté-Cornell,et al.  Uncertainties in risk analysis: Six levels of treatment , 1996 .

[13]  Vicki M. Bier,et al.  Uncertainty about probability: a reconciliation with the subjectivist viewpoint , 1996, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[14]  Gordon B. Hazen,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis and the Expected Value of Perfect Information , 1998, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[15]  H. Christopher Frey,et al.  Probabilistic Techniques in Exposure Assessment: A Handbook for Dealing with Variability and Uncertainty in Models and Inputs , 1999 .

[16]  Kimberly M Thompson,et al.  Variability and Uncertainty Meet Risk Management and Risk Communication , 2002, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[17]  Scott Ferson,et al.  Constructing Probability Boxes and Dempster-Shafer Structures , 2003 .

[18]  I. Dubus,et al.  Sources of uncertainty in pesticide fate modelling. , 2003, The Science of the total environment.

[19]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Model Uncertainty and Choices Made by Modelers: Lessons Learned from the International Atomic Energy Agency Model Intercomparisons † , 2003, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[20]  Peter A Vanrolleghem,et al.  Variability and uncertainty assessment of patulin exposure for preschool children in Flanders. , 2007, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[21]  S. Liebowitz Anatomy of a Train Wreck: Causes of the Mortgage Meltdown , 2008 .

[22]  Gerald G. Brown,et al.  When Is Uncertainty About Uncertainty Worth Characterizing? , 2008, Interfaces.

[23]  F. Butler,et al.  Development and validation of a probabilistic second-order exposure assessment model for Escherichia coli O157:H7 contamination of beef trimmings from Irish meat plants. , 2008, Meat science.

[24]  What's wrong with hazard-ranking systems? An expository note. , 2009, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[25]  Jonathan I Levy,et al.  Science and Decisions: Advancing Risk Assessment , 2010, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[26]  Mieke Uyttendaele,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis of a Two‐Dimensional Quantitative Microbiological Risk Assessment: Keeping Variability and Uncertainty Separated , 2011, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[27]  Robert T. Clemen,et al.  Making Hard Decisions with DecisionTools , 2013 .