A Comparative Evaluation of Display Technologies for Reading

This paper describes experiments investigating factors that contribute to the readability of computer displays. We present two experiments that focus on reading text from various display technologies, ranging from paper to novel, high-resolution, flat panel displays. This work represents a sequence of controlled experiments and field studies aimed at better understanding the affordances of paper and corresponding design requirements for portable reading devices. Our efforts update previous studies and consider new factors afforded by advances in display technology. Although our findings indicate no statistically significant performance differences between reading from paper and reading from electronic displays for intensive, short proofreading tasks, users nonetheless indicate a strong subjective preference for paper. Evidence from a second experiment indicate that the previously unexamined factors of weight, flexibility and thickness are significant factors behind this.

[1]  Gerard C. Jorna,et al.  Image Quality Determines Differences in Reading Performance and Perceived Image Quality with CRT and Hard-Copy Displays , 1991, Human factors.

[2]  Kenneth R. Laughery,et al.  Effects of Two Type Density Characteristics on the Legibility of Print , 1992 .

[3]  Thomas S. Tullis,et al.  Readability of fonts in the windows environment , 1995, CHI 95 Conference Companion.

[4]  R. T. Wilkinson,et al.  Proof-reading: VDU and paper text compared for speed, accuracy and fatigue , 1987 .

[5]  Kenton O'Hara,et al.  A comparison of reading paper and on-line documents , 1997, CHI.

[6]  W. Cushman Reading from Microfiche, a VDT, and the Printed Page: Subjective Fatigue and Performance , 1986, Human factors.

[7]  V Barnes,et al.  Reading Is Slower from CRT Displays than from Paper: Attempts to Isolate a Single-Variable Explanation , 1987, Human factors.

[8]  Andrew Dillon,et al.  Reading from paper versus screens: a critical review of the empirical literature , 1992 .

[9]  Robert Clear,et al.  Size as a Determinant of Reading Speed , 1993 .

[10]  S. Kokoschka,et al.  Visibility aspects of VDUs in terms of contrast and luminance , 1986 .

[11]  John D. Gould,et al.  Reading from CRT Displays Can Be as Fast as Reading from Paper , 1987 .

[12]  J. D. Gould,et al.  Doing the Same Work with Hard Copy and with Cathode-Ray Tube (CRT) Computer Terminals , 1984 .

[13]  Kenton O'Hara,et al.  A diary study of work-related reading: design implications for digital reading devices , 1998, CHI.

[14]  Marelys L. Garcia,et al.  The effect of color and typeface on the readability of on-line text , 1996 .

[15]  Harry L. Snyder,et al.  Image Quality Determines Differences in Reading Performance and Perceived Image Quality with CRT and Hard-Copy Displays , 1991 .

[16]  Mark C. Detweiler,et al.  Do Human Factors Color Recommendations have any Practical Value? , 1995 .

[17]  Anita V. Kak Relationships Between Readability of Printed and Crt-Displayed Text , 1981 .

[18]  Stephen E. Newstead,et al.  Proof-reading on VDUs , 1987 .

[19]  Helmut Krueger,et al.  Lighting characteristics, legibility and visual comfort of displays , 1984 .

[20]  William C. Treurniet,et al.  Extended Reading of Continuous Text on Television Screens , 1982 .