Using EEG to understand how our brain elaborate information in stated choice experiments: Easy versus hard tasks in the choice of vehicles

In the current study, we aim to provide preliminary evidence that complex consumer choices depends on cognitive processes and executive functions that may not be fully captured by current stated choice (SC) approaches. To address this gap, here we combine the standard SC experiment with electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings while manipulating the cognitive demands of the task. Our study is applied to the choice context of a car purchase between a petrol and an electric vehicle. Respondents were asked to fill in a stated choice experiment online and a subsample of these respondents were then invited to participate in an EEG study during which they repeated the same SC experiment while we continuously recorded EEG signals from their scalp. We then modelled people’s choice behaviours in easy and hard decisions, and compared this analysis of their choice behaviour to their EEG responses in these two conditions. Our results confirm that hard decisions lead to higher cognitive demands and larger EEG responses in electrodes on the frontal part of the scalp and these demands can lead to choices inconsistent with the compensatory assumptions.

[1]  Elisabetta Cherchi,et al.  Workshop Synthesis: Stated Preference Surveys and Experimental Design, an Audit of the Journey so far and Future Research Perspectives , 2015 .

[2]  R D Pascual-Marqui,et al.  Standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA): technical details. , 2002, Methods and findings in experimental and clinical pharmacology.

[3]  K. Miller Executive functions. , 2005, Pediatric annals.

[4]  Saskia Haegens,et al.  Beyond the Status Quo: A Role for Beta Oscillations in Endogenous Content (Re)Activation , 2017, eNeuro.

[5]  Sajjad Farashi,et al.  The application of EEG power for the prediction and interpretation of consumer decision-making: A neuromarketing study , 2019, Physiology & Behavior.

[6]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[7]  Richard Dewhurst,et al.  Using eye-tracking to trace a cognitive process: Gaze behavior during decision making in a natural environment , 2013 .

[8]  Dino J Levy,et al.  A gateway to consumers' minds: Achievements, caveats, and prospects of electroencephalography-based prediction in neuromarketing. , 2018, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[9]  Iain Fraser,et al.  Visual Attention and Attribute Attendance in Multi-Attribute Choice Experiments , 2015 .

[10]  Juan de Dios Ortúzar,et al.  The Stochastic Satisficing model: A bounded rationality discrete choice model , 2017, Journal of Choice Modelling.

[11]  Shah Seema,et al.  Methods of Neuromarketing and Implication of the Frontal Theta Asymmetry induced due to musical stimulus as choice modeling , 2018 .

[12]  L. M. Ward,et al.  Synchronous neural oscillations and cognitive processes , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  Mehrdad Nojoumian,et al.  EEG-Based Classification of Emotional State Using an Autonomous Vehicle Simulator , 2018, 2018 IEEE 10th Sensor Array and Multichannel Signal Processing Workshop (SAM).

[14]  Elisabetta Cherchi,et al.  A long panel survey to elicit variation in preferences and attitudes in the choice of electric vehicles , 2014 .

[15]  M. Matousek,et al.  Standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA) in the prediction of response to cholinesterase inhibitors in patients with Alzheimer's disease , 2008 .

[16]  Lubomir Pousek,et al.  Fatigue Indicators of Drowsy Drivers Based on Analysis of Physiological Signals , 2001, ISMDA.

[17]  J. Serences,et al.  Value-based attentional capture influences context-dependent decision-making. , 2015, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  Michel Bierlaire,et al.  PythonBiogeme: a short introduction , 2016 .

[19]  Joseph G. Johnson,et al.  Response dynamics: A new window on the decision process , 2011, Judgment and Decision Making.

[20]  Panagiotis Mavros,et al.  Geo-EEG: Towards the Use of EEG in the Study of Urban Behaviour , 2016 .

[21]  Stefan Bode,et al.  Hard Decisions Shape the Neural Coding of Preferences , 2018, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  Olivier Toubia,et al.  A Bounded Rationality Model of Information Search and Choice in Preference Measurement , 2014 .

[23]  Søren Bøye Olsen,et al.  Choice certainty in Discrete Choice Experiments: Will eye tracking provide useful measures? , 2016 .

[24]  José Manuel Ferrández,et al.  EEG-Based Detection of Braking Intention Under Different Car Driving Conditions , 2018, Front. Neuroinform..

[25]  Martin Meißner,et al.  Eye Tracking Reveals Processes that Enable Conjoint Choices to Become Increasingly Efficient with Practice , 2016 .